Contemporary Restorative Materials in Primary Molars

NCT ID: NCT06544486

Last Updated: 2024-08-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

86 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-01

Study Completion Date

2024-07-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the clinical effectiveness of four ion-releasing restorative materials in the proximal cavities of primary molars that underwent selective caries removal. The main questions to answer are:

* Will there be any difference among the restorative materials clinical succes in the means of modified United States Public Health Services (USPHS) criteria for dental restorations?
* Will there be any difference among the restorative materials in the means of preservation of pulpal vitality? Eighty six children (262 teeth), between 5 and 9 years old (7.15±1.14) enrolled for the study. Researchers will compare the clinical performance of restorative materials, (1:Equia Forte HT; 2: Fuji II LC; 3: Cention N; 4: ChemFil Rock), applied to the proximal cavities of primary molars following selective caries removal, according to the modified USPHS criteria.

Participants will:

\- visit the clinic 1st,3rd,6th,12th,18th,24th,30th and 36th months after the restoration.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Caries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
The materials were visually different from each other, which allowed the investigators to identify each material. As a result, masking could only be performed with the participants.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Device: Hybrid Glass-ionomer Cement (Equia Forte HT)

The material in capsule form was placed in the mixer (Ultramat 2, SDI, Australia) and mixed for 10 seconds, and applied to the cavity in a single step. The restorative material was polymerized for 20 seconds using an LED light device (VALO, Ultradent, Utah, USA). Equia Forte Coat was applied and polymerized for 20 seconds.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Caries Removal

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The cavity preparation and restoration were performed by a single operator. Infected dentin tissue was selectively removed. The differentiation between infected and affected dentin was determined by the clinician through the visual-tactile method.Isolation was achieved with cotton rolls and suction.

Filling

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sectional matrix systems and interdental wedges were used to achieve an anatomical contour and contact. Then, the selected materials were placed in the cavity according to the manufacturers' recommendations.

Device: Resin-Modified Glass-ionomer Cement (Fuji II LC)

The material in capsule form was mixed in the mixer (Ultramat 2, SDI, Australia) for 10 seconds, and applied to the cavity in a single step. Polymerization was achieved using an LED light device (VALO, Ultradent, Utah, USA) for 20 seconds.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Caries Removal

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The cavity preparation and restoration were performed by a single operator. Infected dentin tissue was selectively removed. The differentiation between infected and affected dentin was determined by the clinician through the visual-tactile method.Isolation was achieved with cotton rolls and suction.

Filling

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sectional matrix systems and interdental wedges were used to achieve an anatomical contour and contact. Then, the selected materials were placed in the cavity according to the manufacturers' recommendations.

Device: Bioactive Glass-Containing Alkasite (Cention N)

The material was mixed using a plastic spatula on a mixing pad or glass with a powder-to-liquid ratio of 1:1 until it reached a homogeneous consistency, which took approximately 45 -60 seconds. Then the material was applied to the cavity and allowed to set for its self-curing time of 4 and a half minutes.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Caries Removal

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The cavity preparation and restoration were performed by a single operator. Infected dentin tissue was selectively removed. The differentiation between infected and affected dentin was determined by the clinician through the visual-tactile method.Isolation was achieved with cotton rolls and suction.

Filling

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sectional matrix systems and interdental wedges were used to achieve an anatomical contour and contact. Then, the selected materials were placed in the cavity according to the manufacturers' recommendations.

Device: Zinc-Reinforced High-Viscosity Glass-ionomer Cement (ChemFil Rock)

The material in capsule form was placed in the mixer (Ultramat 2, SDI, Australia) and mixed for 12 seconds, and applied to the cavity in a single step. In addition to the 90-second working time, an additional 4 and a half minutes were allowed for the material to cure.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Caries Removal

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The cavity preparation and restoration were performed by a single operator. Infected dentin tissue was selectively removed. The differentiation between infected and affected dentin was determined by the clinician through the visual-tactile method.Isolation was achieved with cotton rolls and suction.

Filling

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sectional matrix systems and interdental wedges were used to achieve an anatomical contour and contact. Then, the selected materials were placed in the cavity according to the manufacturers' recommendations.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Caries Removal

The cavity preparation and restoration were performed by a single operator. Infected dentin tissue was selectively removed. The differentiation between infected and affected dentin was determined by the clinician through the visual-tactile method.Isolation was achieved with cotton rolls and suction.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Filling

Sectional matrix systems and interdental wedges were used to achieve an anatomical contour and contact. Then, the selected materials were placed in the cavity according to the manufacturers' recommendations.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

For participants:

* no known or suspected history of allergy to medications or restorative materials
* no habits of teeth grinding or clenching
* presence of at least one interproximal carious lesion

For teeth:

* carious lesion reaching at least 1/2 dentin
* in contact with adjacent teeth and in occlusion with antagonist teeth
* have no pathological mobility
* periodontally healthy
* no symptoms of pulpal pathology
* physiological root resorption should not exceed one-third of the root length if seen
* permanent tooth germ present below the tooth

Exclusion Criteria

* did not attend their follow-up appointments
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

9 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Akdeniz University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zulfikar Zahit Ciftci

Head of Pediatric Dentistry

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zulfikar Zahit Ciftci, Phd

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Akdeniz University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Akdeniz University

Antalya, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TDH- 2022-5832

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Use of Fissure Sealants on Primary Molars
NCT01438866 COMPLETED PHASE4