Resin Infiltration and Fluoride Varnish Lesion Arresting Efficacy on Non-cavitated Proximal Lesion
NCT ID: NCT05202665
Last Updated: 2022-01-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-09-26
2022-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study was a randomized controlled, prospective and parallel designed clinical trial. 60 patients were included in the study and patients were randomly allocate to the groups. Caries risk of individuals was determined according to Cariogram, which is a computer program․ According to visual clinical examination, stage the caries continuum were (ICDAS 1,2) scored and the caries diagnostic criteria scored acording to (Nyvad 1, 2, 4, 5) The teeth wich has one caries lesion in border of enamel or prolonged to first 1/3 part of dentin in bite-wing radiograph (lesion level: E1, E2, D1) included in this study. Patient's gingival condition evaluating at initial and control sessions with gingival index (0=healthy, 1=mild inflammation, 2=moderate inflammation and bleeding on pressure). Oral hygiene training was given to all subjects included in the study and the use of fluoride toothpaste (1450 ppm, NaF) was recommended. This study was performed in a single center by experienced physicians. Resin infiltration (Icon DMG, USA) was applied to one of the groups(n=30), while fluoride varnish (ClinproTM White Varnish 22600 ppm, 3M ESPE, USA) was applied to the other group(n=30). The patients follow-up time was anticipated for 60 months in 6-month periods. The inicial visual clinical examination(T0) and follow-up sessions (T 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) were conducted by two experienced researchers blind to the group information. At the aim of the study, evaluation difference in non-cavited proximal lesion progression between the resin infiltration (micro-invasive) and fluoride varnish (non-invasive) treatment options at the individuals with moderate or high risk of caries.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
"Comparison of the Effects of Resin Infiltrant, Fluoride Varnish, and the Combined Application of Resin Infiltrant and Fluoride Varnish on Primary Molars in the Treatment of Proximal Non-Cavitated Carious Lesions in Children."
NCT07112963
Effect of Light Curable Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Varnish on Non-Cavitated Proximal Carious Lesions' Progression
NCT03685058
Resin Infiltration and Resin Infiltration With Bleaching in Improving the Esthetics for Fluorosis Stains
NCT01733888
Clinical Trial Proximal Caries Infiltration and Detection
NCT01796106
Contemporary Restorative Materials in Primary Molars
NCT06544486
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Flouride Varnish applications (non-invasive approaches)
ClinproTM White Varnish 22600 ppm, 3M ESPE was applied in line with the manufacturer's recommendation to non-cavitated proximal caries lesion.
ClinproTM White Varnish, 3M ESPE Fluoride Varnish (non-invasive approach)
Tooth surfaces were cleaned thoroughly and isolated with cotton rolls. According to the manufacturer's instructions, the unit dose packages were opened, and the contents were dispensed onto the application guide and mixed to avoid the separation of sodium fluoride components. A thin coat of varnish (ClinproTM White Varnish, 3M ESPE, USA) with 22600 ppm fluoride was applied to the tooth interface with a brush tip applicator and waited for 5 minutes. Aproximal areas were coated with dental floss. The patient was instructed not to rinse or apply suction immediately after application. Patients were advised to avoid eating hard and sticky foods or drinking hot beverages for the next 2 hours, to consume a soft diet immediately after 30 minutes and to avoid brushing and flossing for the rest of the day.
Resin Infiltration (micro-invasive approaches)
ICON DMG was applied in line with the manufacturer's recommendation to non-cavitated proximal caries lesion.
ICON DMG Resin Infiltration (micro-invasive approach)
A plastic wedge located below the contact point to apart from the surface from adjacent tooth. A 15% HCl etching gel (Icon, DMG, Hamburg, Germany) was applied by syringe below the contact point for 120 s. After, the gel was washed off with air-water-spray for 30 s. The lesion was desiccated by air-blowing for 10 s, application of ethanol for 30 s and air-blowing again for 30 s. A resin infiltrant (Icon, DMG, Hamburg, Germany) was applied with another plastic holder during 3 min. Following the penetration, excess of material was removed by air blowing and flossing. The resin was light-cured for 40 s total from the buccal, occlusal, and lingual/palatal aspects. It was needed to reapplicate the resin infiltration for once because of infiltrating remaining porosities during 1 minute. Excess material removing process was again repeated and light cured for 40 s.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ICON DMG Resin Infiltration (micro-invasive approach)
A plastic wedge located below the contact point to apart from the surface from adjacent tooth. A 15% HCl etching gel (Icon, DMG, Hamburg, Germany) was applied by syringe below the contact point for 120 s. After, the gel was washed off with air-water-spray for 30 s. The lesion was desiccated by air-blowing for 10 s, application of ethanol for 30 s and air-blowing again for 30 s. A resin infiltrant (Icon, DMG, Hamburg, Germany) was applied with another plastic holder during 3 min. Following the penetration, excess of material was removed by air blowing and flossing. The resin was light-cured for 40 s total from the buccal, occlusal, and lingual/palatal aspects. It was needed to reapplicate the resin infiltration for once because of infiltrating remaining porosities during 1 minute. Excess material removing process was again repeated and light cured for 40 s.
ClinproTM White Varnish, 3M ESPE Fluoride Varnish (non-invasive approach)
Tooth surfaces were cleaned thoroughly and isolated with cotton rolls. According to the manufacturer's instructions, the unit dose packages were opened, and the contents were dispensed onto the application guide and mixed to avoid the separation of sodium fluoride components. A thin coat of varnish (ClinproTM White Varnish, 3M ESPE, USA) with 22600 ppm fluoride was applied to the tooth interface with a brush tip applicator and waited for 5 minutes. Aproximal areas were coated with dental floss. The patient was instructed not to rinse or apply suction immediately after application. Patients were advised to avoid eating hard and sticky foods or drinking hot beverages for the next 2 hours, to consume a soft diet immediately after 30 minutes and to avoid brushing and flossing for the rest of the day.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* the presence of one or more noncavitated interproximal caries lesions with radiolucencies involving the outher half of enamel up to the outer third of dentin in bite-wing radiographies (lesion depth: E1, E2, D1)
* vital posterior teeth without cavitation in which the clinically active non-carious lesion had
* Only one tooth per patient was included in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* pregnancy
* presence of secondary caries or restoration in the involved tooth
* lack of contact teeth
* incapable of contracting
18 Years
43 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ege University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
TIJEN PAMIR
Prof. Dr
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Elif Ercan Devrimci, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Ege University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ege University Faculty of Dentistry
Izmir, Bornova, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Nonrestorative Treatments for Caries: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
Efficacy of Proximal Resin Infiltration on Caries Inhibition: Results from a 3-Year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
MI varnish and MI paste plus in a caries prevention and remineralization study: A randomized controlled trial
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
70198063-050.06.04/17-8/7
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.