Video Classification of Intubation in Spain (VCI)

NCT ID: NCT06537531

Last Updated: 2026-01-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

1500 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-07-26

Study Completion Date

2026-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Use of VCI in Spain

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The clinical importance of airway management has gained relevance over the last decade in most scientific societies with the objective of improving the standard of care.

The WHO has focused its guidelines on "Safe Surgery," aiming to encompass all methods that predict and recognize the risk of difficult airway management or aspiration, which must be applied by the surgical team. To this end, it has created and implemented a surgical safety checklist that can be useful in reducing the risk of unidentified difficulties.

The same suggestion has been included in the Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anesthesiology, endorsed by most European entities in cooperation with the European Society of Anesthesiology (ESA), the European Board of Anesthesiology (EBA-UEMS), the World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiology (WFA), and the European Patients' Federation (EPF). The protocol for difficult airway management and the implications of the Helsinki Declaration were published in 2013 in the Spanish Journal of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation.

Airway management today is perhaps the field that most concerns anesthesiologists, as decisions and actions must be taken quickly and effectively when facing a potential difficult airway (DA). Failure to do so would result in significant morbidity and mortality for patients.

The incidence of difficulty in orotracheal intubation (OTI) ranges between 1.5% and 13%. Most errors in airway management are due to ignorance and the low reliability of traditional protocols, algorithms, and combinations of detection tools to identify a potentially difficult airway.

This field is constantly evolving, and in the last 20 years, we have witnessed the emergence of a large number of devices: Supraglottic Devices (SGDs) or Extraglottic Devices (EGDs) in the past decade, and Optical Devices (videolaryngoscopes) in this last decade.

The existence of a large number of new devices in this field implies a deep understanding of these, both theoretically and practically, during scheduled surgery. Once this is achieved, practitioners should know how to use them appropriately in DA situations.

Since 1993, when the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) published its "Recommendations for Difficult Airway Management," many countries and scientific societies have created their protocols, guidelines, and algorithms that we must know and apply, always adapting them to our environment and the available devices.

In Spain, since the mid-1990s, DA training programs for specialist doctors have been launched, gradually expanding and covering all personnel involved in airway management. Today, training in this field has become part of the knowledge and skills acquisition in various specialties, notably Anesthesiology and Resuscitation.

The phrase "prevention is better than cure" is an intuitive, acceptable, and politically correct concept. This is applicable in our field since, although there are not many patient factors we can modify (anatomy is intrinsic), there are possible modifications in our actions that can determine the success or failure in airway management.

Currently, there is no universally accepted method for describing tracheal intubation via videolaryngoscopy. It is important that this information is communicated and documented accurately to plan airway management procedures for the patient, thereby improving care safety. The Intubation Classification Scale or Video Intubation Classification (VCI) score has been proposed to succinctly describe the key practical elements of tracheal intubation via videolaryngoscopy in the order they are performed. This classification consists of three sections: the first describes the type of blade used (Macintosh or hyperangulated), the second describes the POGO (Percentage of Glottic Opening) at the time of intubation, and finally, the ease/difficulty or impossibility of inserting the tube through the glottis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Difficult Intubation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients

Patients from any geographical area of the Iberian Peninsula who decide to undergo scheduled surgery at our hospital during a period of 6 months (2024-25).

Compare VCI scale

Intervention Type OTHER

Compare VCI scale

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Compare VCI scale

Compare VCI scale

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients from any geographical area of the Iberian Peninsula who decide to undergo scheduled surgery at our hospital during a period of 6 months (2024-25).

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \<18
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinica Universidad de Navarra

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Miguel Angel Fernandez-Vaquero

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Miguel Angel Fernandez-Vaquero, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

0034913531920 ext. 7633

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Miguel Angel Fernandez Vaquero, MD

Role: primary

+34913531920 ext. 7633

Miguel Angel Fernandez-Vaquero, MD, PhD

Role: primary

0034913531920 ext. 7633

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fernandez-Vaquero MA, Charco-Mora P, Sastre-Rincon JA, Gomez-Rios MA, Cardenas-Gomez J, Martinez-Hurtado E, Aracil-Escoda N, Vallejo-Tarrat A, Thion-Soriano I, Peral-Sanchez D, Castaneda-Pascual M, Rodriguez Del Rio M, de Luis-Cabezon N, Gonzalez-Garcia J, Acosta-Martinez J, Gonzalez-Santos S, Onrubia-Fuertes X, Martinez-Gonzalez E, Roca de Togores-Lopez A, Gonzalez-Mendibil I, Banos-Maestro A, Mariscal-Flores M, Lluch-Oltra A, Emazabel-Yunta I, Rodriguez-Sanabria DM, Alvarez-Avello JM, Melendez Salinas DA, Lopez-Correa T, Sanchez-Merchante M, Bermudez-Lopez M, Martinez-Gallego E, Martinez-Segovia MC, Martin-Andres AB, Molero-Diez Y, Garcia-Aroca MA, Tapia-Salinas B, Puig-Bernabe J, Piano A, Hernandez-Fernandez G, Mingote-Llado A, Garcia-Fernandez J, Mata-Estevez J, Reviriego-Agudo L, Ruiz-Cordoba G, Moya-Moradas J, Marques-Asin FJ, Santacana MV; VCISpain Trial Investigators Group. VCISpain: protocol for a prospective multicenter observational study to validate a standardized classification tool for tracheal intubation using videolaryngoscopy. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2025 Sep-Oct;75(5):844653. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844653. Epub 2025 Jun 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40553732 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022.079

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Awake Intubation V-MAC VS
NCT03742830 COMPLETED