Evaluation of Soft and Hard Tissue Healing and Implant Stability Of Hydrophilic Versus Conventional Titanium Dental Implants.
NCT ID: NCT06519019
Last Updated: 2024-07-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-07-31
2025-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparative Evaluation of Implant Stability, Soft & Hard Tissue Healing Around UV Activated vs Conventional Implants
NCT06541912
Response of Hard and Soft Tissue Around the Dental Implant to 2-Piece Abutment Vs Conventional Restorative Protocols
NCT06818890
Comparative Evaluation of the Clinical Efficacy of Short Implants With Standard-Length Implants - a Randomised Controlled Trial
NCT06520332
Evaluation of Cross-linked Collagen Membrane With and Without Silk Fibroin Around Immediate Dental Implants
NCT06552065
Soft Tissue Response to Different Restorative Materials Used in Implant Dentistry
NCT06554041
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Several methods are widely used to modify the implant surface, such as sandblasting, acid etching, anodic oxidation, fluoride treatment, machining, titanium plasma spraying, and calcium phosphate coating. In dental implant, the surface treatment is used to modify the surface topography and surface energy, resulting in an improved wettability (hydrophilicity), increased cell proliferation and growth, and accelerated osseointegration process and reduced treatment duration. Hydrophilicity presents major advantages during the initial stages of wound healing and during the cascade of events that occurs during osseointegration, facilitating bone integration.
Although there are several studies which compares hydrophilic and hydrophobic implants, there are limited split mouth studies evaluating healing capacity of hydrophilic implants and hydrophobic implants.
Hence the aim of the present study is to evaluate the Marginal bone loss, healing of soft tissue, and primary and secondary implant stability of hydrophobic and hydrophilic implants in same subjects.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Hydrophilic Dental Implant Group
One dental implant placed will have hydrophilic properties.
Dental Implant Surgery - Hydrophilic group
A full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated, under Local anaesthesia, osteotomy sites were prepared according to manufactures instructions, and parallel pin was used to confirm position and angulation of osteotomy site. One site received a hydrophilic implant and the other site received a conventional implant.
Ostell ISQ was used to measure primary stability of the dental implant. The surgical wound closure was with mattress and single interrupted sutures, using 4-0 vicryl suture.
Conventional Dental Implant Group
This Conventional Dental implant group will act as control.
Dental Implant Surgery - Conventional group
A full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated, under Local anaesthesia, osteotomy sites were prepared according to manufactures instructions, and parallel pin was used to confirm position and angulation of osteotomy site. One site received a hydrophilic implant and the other site received a conventional implant.
Ostell ISQ was used to measure primary stability of the dental implant. The surgical wound closure was with mattress and single interrupted sutures, using 4-0 vicryl suture.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dental Implant Surgery - Hydrophilic group
A full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated, under Local anaesthesia, osteotomy sites were prepared according to manufactures instructions, and parallel pin was used to confirm position and angulation of osteotomy site. One site received a hydrophilic implant and the other site received a conventional implant.
Ostell ISQ was used to measure primary stability of the dental implant. The surgical wound closure was with mattress and single interrupted sutures, using 4-0 vicryl suture.
Dental Implant Surgery - Conventional group
A full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated, under Local anaesthesia, osteotomy sites were prepared according to manufactures instructions, and parallel pin was used to confirm position and angulation of osteotomy site. One site received a hydrophilic implant and the other site received a conventional implant.
Ostell ISQ was used to measure primary stability of the dental implant. The surgical wound closure was with mattress and single interrupted sutures, using 4-0 vicryl suture.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients who needs replacement of two or more teeth in mandible.
3. Adequate bone volume to accommodate planned dental implants.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Intravenous and oral bisphosphonate therapy.
3. Presence of severe, moderate or mild untreated periodontal disease.
4. Unwillingness to return for the follow-up examination.
5. Smokers.
6. Patients who are psychologically unable to participate.
7. Poor oral hygiene.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
02_D012_147447
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.