Acellular Dermal Matrix Versus Tenting Technique in Peri-implant Soft Tissue Augmentation and Crestal Bone Stability
NCT ID: NCT06302387
Last Updated: 2024-03-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-01-01
2023-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Long-term Follow up of Mucosal Tissue Height Influence on Peri-implant Bone Levels.
NCT06302322
Soft Tissue Response to Different Restorative Materials Used in Implant Dentistry
NCT06554041
Vertical Soft Tissue Augmentation With Tent Pole Technique and Its Influence on Marginal Bone Loss Around Dental Implants
NCT07018531
Effect of Soft Tissue Augmentation With an Acellular Dermal Matrix in Marginal Bone Levels Around Implants
NCT05156294
Cross-linked Volume-stable Collagen Matrix Versus Connective Tissue Graft At Implant Site.
NCT05458271
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Acellular Dermal Matrix
This group received vertical soft tissue thickness augmentation using an acellular dermal matrix.
Acellular Dermal Matrix
The ADM arm involved vertical soft tissue augmentation using an acellular dermal matrix. This process included the placement of a porcine dermal collagen graft (Mucoderm®, Institut Straumann AG, Switzerland) atop the dental implant site. The graft, measuring 15x20 mm, was hydrated in a 0.5% Metronidazole solution for 20 minutes before application, then trimmed and placed to extend 10 by 5 mm beyond the implant margins in both buccal and lingual directions. The primary wound closure was achieved using double mattress suturing with 6-0 Prolene (Ethicon, USA).
Soft Tissue Expansion using Tenting Technique
This group underwent soft tissue expansion using a tenting technique with a submerged healing abutment.
Soft Tissue Expansion using Tenting Technique
The Tenting Technique arm involved soft tissue expansion using a submerged healing abutment to promote soft tissue growth. After implant placement, 2 mm healing abutments were set on the implants. Flaps were mobilized using vertical releasing incisions, and tension-free wound closure was achieved with horizontal mattress sutures followed by suturing the incision line with interrupted sutures for primary and submerged healing. This method aimed to create a subepithelial healing space for soft tissue expansion and augmentation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Acellular Dermal Matrix
The ADM arm involved vertical soft tissue augmentation using an acellular dermal matrix. This process included the placement of a porcine dermal collagen graft (Mucoderm®, Institut Straumann AG, Switzerland) atop the dental implant site. The graft, measuring 15x20 mm, was hydrated in a 0.5% Metronidazole solution for 20 minutes before application, then trimmed and placed to extend 10 by 5 mm beyond the implant margins in both buccal and lingual directions. The primary wound closure was achieved using double mattress suturing with 6-0 Prolene (Ethicon, USA).
Soft Tissue Expansion using Tenting Technique
The Tenting Technique arm involved soft tissue expansion using a submerged healing abutment to promote soft tissue growth. After implant placement, 2 mm healing abutments were set on the implants. Flaps were mobilized using vertical releasing incisions, and tension-free wound closure was achieved with horizontal mattress sutures followed by suturing the incision line with interrupted sutures for primary and submerged healing. This method aimed to create a subepithelial healing space for soft tissue expansion and augmentation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Physical and psychological capacity to undergo implant therapy (ASA I or II).
* Fully healed single mandibular posterior treatment sites (premolars or molars) being edentulous for at least 3 months.
* Minimum of 6 mm width and 8 mm height native bone ridge.
* No requirement for concomitant or a history of regenerative treatments.
* Minimum of 4mm keratinized mucosa at the implant site (2 mm buccal and 2mm lingual).
* Healthy non-inflamed keratinized soft tissues with a maximum soft tissue thickness height of 2 mm measured at crestal buccal and lingual aspects.
* Periodontally healthy by fulfilling all of the following criteria: Full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) \< 20%, Full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) \< 15%, Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs (CPITN) \< 2.
Exclusion Criteria
* Poor oral hygiene after Oral Hygiene Instructions (OHI).
* Pregnant or lactating.
* Uncontrolled concomitant medical diseases, e.g., diabetes.
* Receiving or having received pharmacological treatment affecting wound healing within 3 months prior to the study-related intervention.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
German O. Gallucci
Associate Professor and Chair Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
VIC Clinic
Vilnius, , Lithuania
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Linkevicius T, Linkevicius R, Alkimavicius J, Linkeviciene L, Andrijauskas P, Puisys A. Influence of titanium base, lithium disilicate restoration and vertical soft tissue thickness on bone stability around triangular-shaped implants: A prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Jul;29(7):716-724. doi: 10.1111/clr.13263. Epub 2018 May 31.
Sculean A, Gruber R, Bosshardt DD. Soft tissue wound healing around teeth and dental implants. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Apr;41 Suppl 15:S6-22. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12206.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BEC-LSMU(R)-27
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.