Intravenous TNK vs TPA for AIS Treatment on MSU,a Prospective Multicenter RCT

NCT ID: NCT06498323

Last Updated: 2024-07-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

160 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-08-03

Study Completion Date

2025-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Acute ischemic stroke is one of the devastating diseases that increase hospitalization, disabilities, and deaths worldwide. Current treatment with intravenous thrombolytic agent can help reduce disabilities and improve quality of life. Intravenous Alteplase is proven benefit and now used as the first-line drug for acute ischemic stroke with symptom onset less than 4.5 hours and without contraindications.

Tenecteplase, a genetically engineered tissue-type plasminogen activator, has been questioned to treat acute ischemic stroke instead of intravenous alteplase. Tenecteplase has more advantages over alteplase including higher fibrin specificity, longer half-life and easier to administer as a single intravenous bolus. The efficacy and safety of intravenous tenecteplase has been studied recently. In 2017, A phase 3 randomized open-label, blinded trial (NOR-TEST) 6 showed that there were no significant differences in efficacy and safety between tenecteplase and alteplase in mild stroke patients. A study in 2020, in the setting of acute large artery occlusion, Tenecteplase resulted in a better 90-day neurological outcome and provided more benefits in reperfusion before endovascular thrombectomy10. Regarding safety concerns, tenecteplase showed no significant higher incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage. Administration, tenecteplase might be better in the setting of the case on mobile stroke units. Assuming, earlier reperfusion by thrombolytic drug may have improved patient's neurologic outcomes. We aim to compare the efficacy and safety between intravenous tenecteplase and alteplase in acute ischemic stroke patients given on mobile stroke units within 4.5 hours after symptom onset.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intravenous Thrombosis Acute Ischemic Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

tenecteplase

Intravenous tenecteplase (0.25mg/kg) will be given in acute ischemic stroke patients on mobile stroke units within 4.5 hours according to the eligibility criteria after randomization allocation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

tenecteplase

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous thrombolytic agents administration

alteplase

Intravenous alteplase (0.9mg/kg) will be given in acute ischemic stroke patients on mobile stroke units within 4.5 hours according to the eligibility criteria after randomization allocation.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

tenecteplase

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous thrombolytic agents administration

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

tenecteplase

Intravenous thrombolytic agents administration

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosed as Acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hr of symptom onset
* Age \> 18 years old
* No contraindication for thrombolytic drug
* Informed consent from patients

Exclusion Criteria

* Diagnosed as Acute ischemic stroke with more than 4.5 hours of symptom onset or uncontained onset
* Have contraindication for thrombolytic drugs
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mahidol University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yongchai Nilanont

associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Siriraj Stroke Center,Siriraj Hospital

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Thailand

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yongchai Nilanont

Role: CONTACT

924245898

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Yongchai Nilanont

Role: primary

859398772

Kanokkarn Wongmayurachat

Role: backup

658794744

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Churilov L, Yassi N, Kleinig TJ, Dowling RJ, Yan B, Bush SJ, Dewey HM, Thijs V, Scroop R, Simpson M, Brooks M, Asadi H, Wu TY, Shah DG, Wijeratne T, Ang T, Miteff F, Levi CR, Rodrigues E, Zhao H, Salvaris P, Garcia-Esperon C, Bailey P, Rice H, de Villiers L, Brown H, Redmond K, Leggett D, Fink JN, Collecutt W, Wong AA, Muller C, Coulthard A, Mitchell K, Clouston J, Mahady K, Field D, Ma H, Phan TG, Chong W, Chandra RV, Slater LA, Krause M, Harrington TJ, Faulder KC, Steinfort BS, Bladin CF, Sharma G, Desmond PM, Parsons MW, Donnan GA, Davis SM; EXTEND-IA TNK Investigators. Tenecteplase versus Alteplase before Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke. N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 26;378(17):1573-1582. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716405.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29694815 (View on PubMed)

Huang X, Cheripelli BK, Lloyd SM, Kalladka D, Moreton FC, Siddiqui A, Ford I, Muir KW. Alteplase versus tenecteplase for thrombolysis after ischaemic stroke (ATTEST): a phase 2, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint study. Lancet Neurol. 2015 Apr;14(4):368-76. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)70017-7. Epub 2015 Feb 26.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25726502 (View on PubMed)

Haley EC Jr, Thompson JL, Grotta JC, Lyden PD, Hemmen TG, Brown DL, Fanale C, Libman R, Kwiatkowski TG, Llinas RH, Levine SR, Johnston KC, Buchsbaum R, Levy G, Levin B; Tenecteplase in Stroke Investigators. Phase IIB/III trial of tenecteplase in acute ischemic stroke: results of a prematurely terminated randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 2010 Apr;41(4):707-11. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.572040. Epub 2010 Feb 25.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20185783 (View on PubMed)

Parsons M, Spratt N, Bivard A, Campbell B, Chung K, Miteff F, O'Brien B, Bladin C, McElduff P, Allen C, Bateman G, Donnan G, Davis S, Levi C. A randomized trial of tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 22;366(12):1099-107. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109842.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22435369 (View on PubMed)

Logallo N, Novotny V, Assmus J, Kvistad CE, Alteheld L, Ronning OM, Thommessen B, Amthor KF, Ihle-Hansen H, Kurz M, Tobro H, Kaur K, Stankiewicz M, Carlsson M, Morsund A, Idicula T, Aamodt AH, Lund C, Naess H, Waje-Andreassen U, Thomassen L. Tenecteplase versus alteplase for management of acute ischaemic stroke (NOR-TEST): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial. Lancet Neurol. 2017 Oct;16(10):781-788. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30253-3. Epub 2017 Aug 2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28780236 (View on PubMed)

Nepal G, Kharel G, Ahamad ST, Basnet B. Tenecteplase versus Alteplase for the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke in a Low-income Country-Nepal: Cost, Efficacy, and Safety. Cureus. 2018 Feb 9;10(2):e2178. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2178.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29651371 (View on PubMed)

Muir KW. Should Tenecteplase Replace Alteplase for Acute Thrombolysis? Stroke. 2021 Mar;52(3):1091-1093. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.033593. Epub 2021 Feb 16. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33588587 (View on PubMed)

Ronning OM, Logallo N, Thommessen B, Tobro H, Novotny V, Kvistad CE, Aamodt AH, Naess H, Waje-Andreassen U, Thomassen L. Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase Between 3 and 4.5 Hours in Low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Stroke. 2019 Feb;50(2):498-500. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024223.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30602354 (View on PubMed)

Katsanos AH, Safouris A, Sarraj A, Magoufis G, Leker RR, Khatri P, Cordonnier C, Leys D, Shoamanesh A, Ahmed N, Alexandrov AV, Tsivgoulis G. Intravenous Thrombolysis With Tenecteplase in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Stroke. 2021 Jan;52(1):308-312. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030220. Epub 2020 Dec 4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33272127 (View on PubMed)

Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, Brozman M, Davalos A, Guidetti D, Larrue V, Lees KR, Medeghri Z, Machnig T, Schneider D, von Kummer R, Wahlgren N, Toni D; ECASS Investigators. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 25;359(13):1317-29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804656.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18815396 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

376/2565(IRB1)

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.