Study of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase for Thrombolysis (Clot Dissolving) in Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT ID: NCT01949948
Last Updated: 2017-05-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
1050 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-09-30
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
HYPOTHESIS: Tenecteplase may be given safely to patients with acute ischemic stroke at a dose that is associated with improved clinical outcome compared with existing treatment options.
AIMS: To compare efficacy and safety of tenecteplase vs. alteplase given \<4½ hours after symptom onset.
STUDY ENDPOINTS: The primary study endpoint is excellent clinical outcome at 3 months (effect). Secondary study endpoints are major early clinical improvement (effect) and bleeding complications (safety).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Norwegian Tenecteplase Stroke Trial 2
NCT03854500
Tenecteplase in Wake-up Ischaemic Stroke Trial
NCT03181360
Randomization to Endovascular Treatment Alone or Preceded by Systemic Thrombolysis With Tenecteplase in Ischemic Stroke
NCT05199194
Alteplase-Tenecteplase Trial Evaluation for Stroke Thrombolysis
NCT02814409
Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase for Stroke Thrombolysis Evaluation Trial in the Ambulance
NCT04071613
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
DESIGN: NOR-TEST is a multi-centre PROBE (prospective randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint) trial with randomisation tenecteplase:alteplase 1:1.
POWER CALCULATION: NOR-TEST aims at detecting a 9 % higher percentage excellent outcome with tenecteplase vs. alteplase (r1=0.40; r2=0.49; OR 1.44; power 0.8), and will include 954 patients during 3 years.
PATIENT RECRUITMENT: All patients found eligible for thrombolytic therapy are eligible for NOR-TEST, i.e. NOR-TEST changes neither inclusion nor exclusion criteria. The number of patients treated at a participating centre will therefore essentially remain unchanged. Estimated 400 patients are thrombolysed per year in participating centres. Allowing for 20% of patients not being included in NOR-TEST, the total number of patients (n=954) will still be met.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Tenecteplase
0.4 mg/kg single bolus intravenously
Tenecteplase
0.4 mg/kg single bolus intravenously
Alteplase
0.9 mg/kg as 10% bolus + 90% infusion/60 minutes intravenously
Alteplase
0.9 mg/kg as 10% bolus + 90% infusion/60 minutes intravenously
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tenecteplase
0.4 mg/kg single bolus intravenously
Alteplase
0.9 mg/kg as 10% bolus + 90% infusion/60 minutes intravenously
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Ischaemic stroke with measurable deficit on NIH Stroke Scale
* All stroke sub-types, severities and vascular distributions,a visible arterial occlusion is not required for inclusion
* Treatment within 4 ½ hours of stroke onset
* Patients awakening with symptoms are defined by the time last observed normal and awake
* Informed written consent signed by the patient, verbal consent from the patients as witnessed by a non-participating health care person, or consent by the signature of the patient's family must be provided
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients for whom a complete NIH Stroke Score cannot be obtained
* Hemiplegic migraine with no arterial occlusion on CTA
* Seizure at stroke onset and no visible occlusion on baseline CTA
* Intracranial haemorrhage on baseline CT
* Clinical presentation suggesting subarachnoid haemorrhage even if baseline CT is normal
* Large areas of hypodense ischaemic changes on baseline CT
* Patients with systolic blood pressure \>185 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure \>110 mm Hg
* Female, pregnant or breast feeding
* Known bleeding diathesis
* Use of oral anticoagulants and International Normalized Ratio (INR) ≥1,4
* Use of new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) within the last 12 hours
* Heparin \<48 hours and increased Activated partial thromboplastin tike (APTT)
* Low molecular weight heparin(oid) \<24 hours
* Any other investigational drug \<14 days
* Sepsis
* Patients with arterial puncture at a noncompressible site or lumbar puncture \<7 days
* Major surgery or serious trauma \<14 days
* Gastrointestinal or urinary tract hemorrhage \<14 days
* Clinical stroke \<2 months
* History of intracranial haemorrhage
* Brain neurosurgery \<2 months
* Serious head trauma \<2 months
* Pericarditis
* Any serious medical illness likely to interact with treatment
* Confounding pre-existent neurological or psychiatric disease
* Unlikely to complete follow-up
* Pregnancy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Research Council of Norway
OTHER
Lars Thomassen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lars Thomassen
Senior Consultant neurologist; Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lars Thomassen, MD PhD Prof.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Dept. Neurology, Haukeland University HospitalBergen, Norway
Ulrike Waje-Andreassen, MD PhD Prof.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Dept. Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen
Nicola Logallo, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dept. Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen, , Norway
Nordland Hospital
Bodø, , Norway
Drammen Hospital
Drammen, , Norway
Førde Central Hospital
Førde, , Norway
Haugesund Hospital
Haugesund, , Norway
Molde Hospital
Molde, , Norway
Akershus University Hospital
Nordbyhagen, , Norway
Ullevål University Hospital
Oslo, , Norway
Baerum Hospital
Rud, , Norway
Telemark Hospital
Skien, , Norway
Stavanger University Hosital
Stavanger, , Norway
St. Olav Hospital NTNU
Trondheim, , Norway
Tønsberg Hospital
Tønsberg, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Logallo N, Kvistad CE, Nacu A, Naess H, Waje-Andreassen U, Asmuss J, Aamodt AH, Lund C, Kurz MW, Ronning OM, Salvesen R, Idicula TT, Thomassen L. The Norwegian tenecteplase stroke trial (NOR-TEST): randomised controlled trial of tenecteplase vs. alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke. BMC Neurol. 2014 May 15;14:106. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-14-106.
Novotny V, Kvistad CE, Naess H, Logallo N, Fromm A, Khanevski AN, Thomassen L. Tenecteplase, 0.4 mg/kg, in Moderate and Severe Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Pooled Analysis of NOR-TEST and NOR-TEST 2A. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Oct 17;12(20):e030320. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030320. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
Ihle-Hansen H, Sandset EC, Ihle-Hansen H, Hagberg G, Thommessen B, Ronning OM, Kvistad CE, Novotny V, Naess H, Waje-Andreassen U, Thomassen L, Logallo N. Sex differences in the Norwegian Tenecteplase Trial (NOR-TEST). Eur J Neurol. 2022 Feb;29(2):609-614. doi: 10.1111/ene.15126. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
Thommessen B, Naess H, Logallo N, Kvistad CE, Waje-Andreassen U, Ihle-Hansen H, Ihle-Hansen H, Thomassen L, Morten Ronning O. Tenecteplase versus alteplase after acute ischemic stroke at high age. Int J Stroke. 2021 Apr;16(3):295-299. doi: 10.1177/1747493020938306. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
Ahmed HK, Logallo N, Thomassen L, Novotny V, Mathisen SM, Kurz MW. Clinical outcomes and safety profile of Tenecteplase in wake-up stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 2020 Nov;142(5):475-479. doi: 10.1111/ane.13296. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
Kvistad CE, Novotny V, Kurz MW, Ronning OM, Thommessen B, Carlsson M, Waje-Andreassen U, Naess H, Thomassen L, Logallo N. Safety and Outcomes of Tenecteplase in Moderate and Severe Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2019 May;50(5):1279-1281. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025041.
Ronning OM, Logallo N, Thommessen B, Tobro H, Novotny V, Kvistad CE, Aamodt AH, Naess H, Waje-Andreassen U, Thomassen L. Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase Between 3 and 4.5 Hours in Low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Stroke. 2019 Feb;50(2):498-500. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024223.
Logallo N, Novotny V, Assmus J, Kvistad CE, Alteheld L, Ronning OM, Thommessen B, Amthor KF, Ihle-Hansen H, Kurz M, Tobro H, Kaur K, Stankiewicz M, Carlsson M, Morsund A, Idicula T, Aamodt AH, Lund C, Naess H, Waje-Andreassen U, Thomassen L. Tenecteplase versus alteplase for management of acute ischaemic stroke (NOR-TEST): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial. Lancet Neurol. 2017 Oct;16(10):781-788. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30253-3. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
Logallo N, Kvistad CE, Thomassen L. Therapeutic Potential of Tenecteplase in the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke. CNS Drugs. 2015;29(10):811-8. doi: 10.1007/s40263-015-0280-9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REK 2011/2435
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.