Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
201 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-10-28
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Tenecteplase, a modified tissue plasminogen activator, has been shown to be a more efficient and safer thrombolytic drug than alteplase in pre-clinical studies. Tenecteplase has replaced alteplase as thrombolytic treatment in myocardial infarction and may also be the drug of choice in ischemic stroke.
Tenecteplase and alteplase had a similar safety profile in the NOR-TEST trial and there were no differences in efficacy between the two treatment groups. However, a majority of patients had mild stroke which may be associated with a natural favorable prognosis.
In spite of these neutral results, tenecteplase has the potential to replace alteplase as the drug of choice, based on a better pharmacological profile and a simpler practical administration. There is, however, need for a higher number of patients to prove the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase.
Hypothesis: Tenecteplase 0.4 mg/kg is non-inferior compared with alteplase 0.9 mg/kg.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase for Thrombolysis (Clot Dissolving) in Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT01949948
Alteplase-Tenecteplase Trial Evaluation for Stroke Thrombolysis
NCT02814409
Tenecteplase in Wake-up Ischaemic Stroke Trial
NCT03181360
Thrombolysis Treated With TNK-tPA in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients (3T Stroke-II)
NCT05281549
Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT03889249
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study design: NOR-TEST-2 is a multi-centre PROBE (prospective randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint) trial, designed to establish non-inferiority of tenecteplase as compared with alteplase for consecutively admitted patients with acute ischaemic stroke treated within 4½ hours after symptom onset. Randomisation tenecteplase:alteplase is 1:1.
Endpoints: Primary endpoint is functional outcome (mRS 0-1) at 90 days (efficacy). Secondary endpoints include rates of cerebral hemorrhages on CT/MR at 24-48 hours and mortality (safety).
Patient recruitment: All patients admitted to hospital with acute ischaemic stroke eligible for standard iv thrombolysis with alteplase and with pre-stroke mRS\<3 and NIHSS score of \>5 on admission are potentially eligible for NOR-TEST-2. Based on power calculations from NOR-TEST, NOR-TEST 2 aims at including 1036 patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Tenecteplase
Tenecteplase
Tenecteplase
0.4 mg/kg single bolus intravenously
Alteplase
Alteplase
Alteplase
0.9 mg/kg as 10% bolus + 90% infusion/60 minutes intravenously
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tenecteplase
0.4 mg/kg single bolus intravenously
Alteplase
0.9 mg/kg as 10% bolus + 90% infusion/60 minutes intravenously
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Ischaemic stroke with clinical symptoms corresponding to National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score (NIHSS) of \>5. All stroke sub-types and vascular distributions are eligible. A visible arterial occlusion is not required for inclusion.
* Treatment \<4½ hours after stroke onset or after awakening with symptoms.
* Informed consent by patient or by patient's family
* Wake-Up Stroke: FLAIR-DWI mismatch on MRI as judged by the (neuro-) radiologist or neurologist.
* Thrombectomy: Occlusion of intracerebral artery technically accessible for endovascular embolectomy as defined by local treatment protocols.
Exclusion Criteria
* Large areas of hypodense ischaemic changes on baseline CT;
* Patients with systolic blood pressure \>185 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure \>110 mm Hg in spite of acute antihypertensive treatment;
* Pregnant women (are treated with alteplase);
* Women with possible pregnancy (are treated with alteplase)
* Beast feeding women, if a 24 hours stop of feeding is not feasible.
* Clinical presentation suggesting subarachnoid haemorrhage even if baseline CT is normal;
* Known bleeding diathesis; use of oral anticoagulants with no antidot, INR ≥1,4; heparin \<48 hours and increased APTT; low molecular weight heparin(oid) \<24 hours; another investigational drug \<14 days;
* Patients with arterial puncture at a noncompressible site or lumbar puncture \<7 days; major surgery or serious trauma \<14 days; gastrointestinal or urinary tract hemorrhage \<14 days; clinical stroke \<2 months; history of intracranial haemorrhage; CNS neurosurgery \<2 months; serious head trauma \<2 months; pericarditis; sepsis; any serious medical illness likely to interact with treatment; confounding pre-existent neurological or psychiatric disease; unlikely to complete follow-up;
* Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, puts a patient at risk if treated with thrombolysis.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Haukeland University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Logallo N, Novotny V, Assmus J, Kvistad CE, Alteheld L, Ronning OM, Thommessen B, Amthor KF, Ihle-Hansen H, Kurz M, Tobro H, Kaur K, Stankiewicz M, Carlsson M, Morsund A, Idicula T, Aamodt AH, Lund C, Naess H, Waje-Andreassen U, Thomassen L. Tenecteplase versus alteplase for management of acute ischaemic stroke (NOR-TEST): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial. Lancet Neurol. 2017 Oct;16(10):781-788. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30253-3. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
Kvistad CE, Naess H, Helleberg BH, Idicula T, Hagberg G, Nordby LM, Jenssen KN, Tobro H, Rorholt DM, Kaur K, Eltoft A, Evensen K, Haasz J, Singaravel G, Fromm A, Thomassen L. Tenecteplase versus alteplase for the management of acute ischaemic stroke in Norway (NOR-TEST 2, part A): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Neurol. 2022 Jun;21(6):511-519. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00124-7. Epub 2022 May 4.
Novotny V, Kvistad CE, Naess H, Logallo N, Fromm A, Khanevski AN, Thomassen L. Tenecteplase, 0.4 mg/kg, in Moderate and Severe Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Pooled Analysis of NOR-TEST and NOR-TEST 2A. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Oct 17;12(20):e030320. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030320. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2018-003090-95
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.