Antiplatelet vs R-tPA for Acute Mild Ischemic Stroke

NCT ID: NCT03661411

Last Updated: 2022-08-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

760 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-10-17

Study Completion Date

2022-07-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is one of common diseases with significant morbidity, mortality and disability. A wide array of studies confirms that intravenous thrombolytic therapy with alteplase can effectively improve the functional prognosis in acute ischemic stroke. Thus all guidelines recommended the intravenous thrombolytic therapy with alteplase for acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours from stroke onset.

Minor stroke is usually defined as NIHSS score ≤ 3 or 5,although it accounts for 1/2-2/3 of AIS, the evidence of thrombolysis is insufficient. A study from Canada shows that 28.5% of patients with minor stroke who have not receive rt-pa thrombolytic therapy are unable to walk independently when discharged. Based on such a consideration,the PRISMS study further compares the efficacy and safety of thrombolytic therapy with antithrombotic therapy in patients with minor stroke. Unfortunately, the study has been early terminated due to the sponsorship reason in 2018, with only 313 cases enrolled. The preliminary results shows that there is no significant difference of the 90-day neurological function between the two groups, while the safety of the treatment group with alteplase has a higher rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. The patient receiving thrombolysis can not be given antithrombolytic therapy within 24 hours even if the patient's condition has worsened, is clinically more puzzling.

The CHANCE study in 2013 shows that the efficacy of aspirin with clopidogrel is superior to aspirin alone with minor stroke (NIHSS \< 3) or TIA(ABCD2 \< 4). The POINT study in 2018 further confirmed the efficacy and safety of intensive antithrombotic therapy within 12 hours of onset with minor stroke.

Based on the above discussion, this study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of aspirin with clopidogrel vs alteplase in the treatment of acute minor stroke.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Aspirin+ clopidogrel

aspirin 100mg qd and clopidogrel 75mg(300mg in the first day)qd with a total of 10-14 days, then oral aspirin 100mg or clopidogrel 75mg qd lasting for 90 days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Aspirin

Intervention Type DRUG

100mg qd

Clopidogrel 75mg

Intervention Type DRUG

75mg(after first dose of 300mg)qd

Alteplase

intravenous alteplase (0.9 mg/kg and maximal dose of 90 mg) was given, and followed by antithrombotic protocol 24 hours after thrombolysis based on clinical guideline.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Alteplase

Intervention Type DRUG

Iv at 0.9 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Aspirin

100mg qd

Intervention Type DRUG

Clopidogrel 75mg

75mg(after first dose of 300mg)qd

Intervention Type DRUG

Alteplase

Iv at 0.9 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient age ≥18 years;
2. Study treatment can be started within 4.5h;
3. Ischemic stroke confirmed by head CT or MRI;
4. NIHSS score ≤ 5, and ≤ 1 NIHSS score in single item scores such as vision, language, neglect and single limb and no score in consciousness item;
5. Premorbid mRS ≤ 1;
6. Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Serious neurological deficits before onset ( mRS ≥ 2);
2. Obvious head injuries or strokes within 3 months;
3. Subarachnoid hemorrhage;
4. History of intracranial hemorrhage;
5. Intracranial tumor, arteriovenous malformation or aneurysm;
6. Intracranial or spinal cord surgery within 3 months;
7. Arterial puncture at a noncompressible site within the previous seven days;
8. Gastrointestinal or urinary tract hemorrhage within the previous 21 days;
9. Major surgery within 1 month;
10. Systolic pressure ≥180 mmHg or diastolic pressure ≥110 mmHg;
11. Blood glucose \< 50 mg/dl (2.7mmol/L);
12. Heparin therapy or oral anticoagulation therapy within 48 hours;
13. Platelet count of \<100,000/mm3 (This does not need to be verified prior to randomization if clinical abnormality is not suspected);
14. Oral warfarin is being taken and INR\>1.6;
15. Abnormal APTT;
16. Pregnancy;
17. Neurological deficit after epileptic seizures;
18. Myocardial infarction within 3 months;
19. Cerebral infarction with definite anticoagulation indications, such as cerebral infarction caused by cardiogenic embolism;
20. Oral administration is not allowed due to dysphagia;
21. allergy to study drugs;
22. Other serious illness that would confound the clinical outcome at 90 days;
23. Participating in other clinical trials within 3 months;
24. patients not suitable for this clinical studies considered by researcher;
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hui-Sheng Chen

Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Huisheng Chen, Doctor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Neurology Department

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Lin Tao

Shenyang, , China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Yao ZG, Pei YF, Chen HS. Onset to Treatment Time and Early Neurological Deterioration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Alteplase in Minor Stroke. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Oct 23:e043980. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.125.043980. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 41128284 (View on PubMed)

Fei ZX, Yin Y, Cui Y, Nguyen TN, Chen HS. Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Alteplase for Mild Stroke with Admission NIHSS Score 0-3 Versus 4-5: A Secondary Analysis of the ARAMIS Randomized Trial. CNS Drugs. 2025 Oct;39(10):1037-1046. doi: 10.1007/s40263-025-01211-6. Epub 2025 Aug 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40760234 (View on PubMed)

He XY, He C, Chen HS. Renal function and efficacy of dual antiplatelet vs. alteplase in minor stroke: a post hoc analysis of ARAMIS study. Front Neurol. 2025 Apr 30;16:1568711. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1568711. eCollection 2025.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40371069 (View on PubMed)

Cui Y, Chen HS. Dual antiplatelet versus alteplase in anterior and posterior circulation minor stroke. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2025 Aug 26;10(4):491-498. doi: 10.1136/svn-2024-003705.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39663175 (View on PubMed)

Cui Y, He C, Li ZA, Wang Y, Chen HS. Dual Antiplatelet Versus Alteplase for Early Neurologic Deterioration in Minor Stroke With Versus Without Large Vessel Occlusion: Prespecified Post Hoc Analysis of the ARAMIS Trial. Stroke. 2024 Nov;55(11):2590-2598. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048248. Epub 2024 Oct 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39387110 (View on PubMed)

Cui Y, Zhao ZA, Wang JQ, Qiu SQ, Shen XY, Li ZY, Hu HZ, Chen HS. Systolic blood pressure and early neurological deterioration in minor stroke: A post hoc analysis of ARAMIS trial. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024 Jul;30(7):e14868. doi: 10.1111/cns.14868.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39014552 (View on PubMed)

Chen HS, Cui Y, Zhou ZH, Zhang H, Wang LX, Wang WZ, Shen LY, Guo LY, Wang EQ, Wang RX, Han J, Dong YL, Li J, Lin YZ, Yang QC, Zhang L, Li JY, Wang J, Xia L, Ma GB, Lu J, Jiang CH, Huang SM, Wan LS, Piao XY, Li Z, Li YS, Yang KH, Wang DL, Nguyen TN; ARAMIS Investigators. Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs Alteplase for Patients With Minor Nondisabling Acute Ischemic Stroke: The ARAMIS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023 Jun 27;329(24):2135-2144. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.7827.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37367978 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

k(2018)22-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Tirofiban for Patients Treated With Alteplase
NCT03357133 TERMINATED PHASE2/PHASE3