We Designed and Implemented the 'MASTER Framework' as a Theoretical Framework to Guide the Design and Delivery of PE and Sports.
NCT ID: NCT06496464
Last Updated: 2024-07-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-09-01
2025-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study on the Effectiveness of Comprehensive Intervention Based on Specialized Physical Education Courses in the Prevention of Comorbidity Among Junior Middle School Students
NCT07237698
Effect of Sport Education on Physical Fitness and Learning Attitude Among Junior High School Students
NCT06322459
Effect of Microteaching Training on the Teaching Skills Level of University Students
NCT06067282
Long-term Impact of PE Teacher Interventions on Adolescent Leisure Time Activity and Motivation
NCT06768788
Early Years Physical Activity and Movement Skills Intervention: a Feasibility Study
NCT04868084
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Phase 2 Eight weeks of teaching mentoring (weeks 2-7) This 8-week phase involved coaches implementing MASTER elements (e.g. 10-minute stretching before a sports game, teachers will give 1-2 sentences of praise during the game for individual students who make a reasonable effort) in their regular training sessions (2 x 1 ½ hour sessions per week) under the guidance of the coach mentor (2-3 experienced coaches who from the member of the research team will evaluate the mentor). The mentor spent one session per week (1 ½ hour) for eight weeks, rotating between coaches to assist in applying the MASTER framework and providing ongoing support. This included access to a discussion platform on Facebook messenger, providing example session activities and MASTER learning activities via the purpose-designed MASTER website, and feedback on draft session plans. During and after the training sessions, the mentor also stimulated dialogue and provided input to coaches regarding potential ways to increase the engagement of players (e.g., adaption of the session activities), questioning techniques to facilitate player reflection and learning, session evaluation and coach reflection; identification of the elements of MASTER in action; and identification of the potential missed opportunity to include an element of MASTER.
Phase 3 3 weeks peer peer-assessed teaching/discussions (weeks 8-10) The mentor prepared and implemented a 2-hour training session highlighting important aspects of the MASTER framework and games-based coaching practices. Coaches were involved in evaluating the mentor using the MASTER observation checklist, and a group discussion based on the checklist and coach observations facilitated the learning episode. This collaborative practise incorporates what is known about professional learning communities and instructional "rounds", and is now common in higher educational settings. The literature supports that learning and understanding are optimised when learners are involved in the feedback process, explicitly learn to become assessors, have a clear framework to evaluate performance, and provide feedback through a discussion or dialogue. Following the coach assessment and reflection session, coaches continued implementing MASTER strategies in their regular training sessions. They were required to undertake a peer observation of a colleague alongside the coach mentor (using the MASTER observation checklist). Feedback and professional dialogue followed the peer observation sessions. Peer dialogue has shown to be an effective and well-received method for improving coaching practices.
Frequency: Participated teachers will be asked to participate in Weekly 2-3 hour game sessions in school, which is an additional component of the intervention (with the teacher's regular class). The sessions will be facilitated by the teacher and supervised by a study team member (weekly 30-40-minute telephone calls with members of the research team discussing strategies for improving game sessions).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
control group
Teachers randomized to the control group will participate in the following:
Basketball training as usual, which involves one 2-3 hour session delivered per week based on local school protocol
Teachers in the control group will only receive the MASTER Teaching Program after completing the study period and assessing outcome measures.
Intervention
Phase 1 MASTER Coach Development Workshop (weeks 1) PE teachers participated in a 6-hour theory and practical teacher education workshop to a research team (JY) member, including 4h of reading relevant papers and books regarding the game-based approach (GBA) .
Phase 2 Eight weeks of teaching mentoring (weeks 2-7) This 8-week phase involved coaches implementing MASTER elements (e.g. 10-minute stretching before a sports game, teachers will give 1-2 sentences of praise during the game for individual students who make a reasonable effort) in their regular training sessions.
Phase 3 3 weeks peer assessed teaching/discussions (weeks 8-10) The mentor prepared and implement a 2-h training session designed to highlight important aspects of the MASTER framework and games-based coaching practices.
Intervention condition (MASTER teacher education program)
Jin Yan will train the PE teachers to complete video assessments and questionnaires. Five teachers from the intervention group will be educated in the MASTER coach education program and trained to deliver a basketball program that aligns with the MASTER framework.
Intervention
Phase 1 MASTER Coach Development Workshop (weeks 1) PE teachers participated in a 6-hour theory and practical teacher education workshop to a research team (JY) member, including 4h of reading relevant papers and books regarding the game-based approach (GBA) .
Phase 2 Eight weeks of teaching mentoring (weeks 2-7) This 8-week phase involved coaches implementing MASTER elements (e.g. 10-minute stretching before a sports game, teachers will give 1-2 sentences of praise during the game for individual students who make a reasonable effort) in their regular training sessions.
Phase 3 3 weeks peer assessed teaching/discussions (weeks 8-10) The mentor prepared and implement a 2-h training session designed to highlight important aspects of the MASTER framework and games-based coaching practices.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intervention
Phase 1 MASTER Coach Development Workshop (weeks 1) PE teachers participated in a 6-hour theory and practical teacher education workshop to a research team (JY) member, including 4h of reading relevant papers and books regarding the game-based approach (GBA) .
Phase 2 Eight weeks of teaching mentoring (weeks 2-7) This 8-week phase involved coaches implementing MASTER elements (e.g. 10-minute stretching before a sports game, teachers will give 1-2 sentences of praise during the game for individual students who make a reasonable effort) in their regular training sessions.
Phase 3 3 weeks peer assessed teaching/discussions (weeks 8-10) The mentor prepared and implement a 2-h training session designed to highlight important aspects of the MASTER framework and games-based coaching practices.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
12 Years
15 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Soochow University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jin Yan
Pro Dr
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SUDA20240626H06
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.