End-expiratory Pressure During Laparoscopic Surgery in the Trendelenburg Position by Electrical Impedance Tomography

NCT ID: NCT06481124

Last Updated: 2025-05-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-06-24

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pneumoperitoneum (PNP) and the position of the patient required for laparoscopic surgery lead to pathophysiological changes that complicate anesthesia. PNP is characterized by an increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), the cranial displacement of the diaphragm that can lead to the formation of intraoperative atelectasis and decrease end-expiratory lung volume (EELV). At the same time, PNP can reduce respiratory system compliance by 30-50% in healthy patients. During elective abdominal surgery under general anesthesia, atelectasis forms in almost 90% of patients and can become a focus of postoperative pneumonia. The negative effect of PNP is more prominent in Trendelenburg position. And one of the methods to avoid the effects of PNP and Trendelenburg position on lung tissue is to apply positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). PEEP is acknowledged as a component of lung protective ventilation (LPV) along with low tidal volume (TV) 6-8 ml/kg. On the other hand, excessive PEEP can lead to the overdistension of lung tissue and cause volutrauma and hemodynamic instability. It is necessary to use sufficient PEEP to minimize atelectasis, improve respiratory biomechanics and maintain oxygenation.

Electrical impedance tomography shows changes in ventilation and perfusion during mechanical ventilation with the different PEEP levels.

The study aimed to select optimum PEEP level based on optimum ventilation-to-perfusion match based on electrical impedance tomography measurements.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Electrical impedance tomography shows changes in ventilation and perfusion during mechanical ventilation with the different PEEP levels. The investigators will measure the following variables: resistivity of low and high pass band and end-expiratory lung index in 4 regions of interest and globally, global inhomogeneity index, global lung-heart index, global regional ventilation delay, compliance win, compliance loss, plateau pressure, and driving pressure.

The investigators will measure abovementioned variables in the following conditions:

* PEEP 5 mbar with the patient in a horizontal supine position (initial measurement, Baseline),
* PEEP 5 mbar in Trendelenburg position in carboxyperitoneum conditions (after reaching the set abdominal pressure of 12-14 mbar) (reference measurement, Ref),
* PEEP 8 mbar in Trendelenburg position under carboxyperitoneum conditions (abdominal pressure 12-14 mbar),
* PEEP 10 mbar in Trendelenburg position in carboxyperitoneum conditions (abdominal pressure 12-14 mbar),
* PEEP 12 mbar in Trendelenburg position in carboxyperitoneum conditions (abdominal pressure 12-14 mbar),
* PEEP 14 mbar in Trendelenburg position in carboxyperitoneum conditions (abdominal pressure 12-14 mbar),
* PEEP 16 mbar in Trendelenburg position in carboxyperitoneum conditions (abdominal pressure 12-14 mbar)
* PEEP 5 mbar with the patient in a horizontal supine position after deflation of the carboxyperitoneum.

After 5 minutes of carboxyperitoneum in Trendelenburg position the investigators will assess ventilation, perfusion and their relationship by the "Analysis" tab in comparison with the initial one in the intubated patient in the supine position (Baseline): improvement of ventilation (CW - compliance win, in %) and deterioration of ventilation (CL - compliance loss, in %), global homogeneity of ventilation (GI - homogeneity index, in %), regional ventilation delays (RVD, in %), ventilation compliance index and perfusion (LHI - lung heart index, in %).

After all stages have been completed, a comparative analysis of the influence of different levels of PEEP on ventilation, perfusion and their ratio will be carried out by using the "Analysis" tab at each stage in comparison with the reference (Ref): CW and CL, GI, RVD, LHI.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pneumoperitoneum Trendelenburg Position Laparoscopic Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

electrical impedance tomography

Measurement of ventilation and perfusion during mechanical ventilation with different positive end-expiratory pressure by electrical impedance tomography

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who undergo gynecological surgery under conditions of carboxyperitoneum in the Trendelenburg position.

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy,
* Hypoxemia before surgery (SpO2 \< 94%),
* body mass index more than 35 kg/m2,
* Unstable hemodynamics and/or life-threatening arrhythmia,
* Primary or secondary lung diseases (COPD, interstitial lung diseases, metastatic lung disease)
* Presence of an implantable pacemaker and/or defibrillator
* Chronic diseases in the stage of decompensation with the development of extrapulmonary organ dysfunction (liver cirrhosis, progression of cancer, chronic heart failure).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrey I Yaroshetskiy, MD, PhD, ScD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sechenov University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinical Hospital 4, Sechenov University

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Russia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Andersson LE, Baath M, Thorne A, Aspelin P, Odeberg-Wernerman S. Effect of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on development of atelectasis during anesthesia, examined by spiral computed tomography. Anesthesiology. 2005 Feb;102(2):293-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200502000-00009.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15681942 (View on PubMed)

Loring SH, Behazin N, Novero A, Novack V, Jones SB, O'Donnell CR, Talmor DS. Respiratory mechanical effects of surgical pneumoperitoneum in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014 Nov 1;117(9):1074-9. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00552.2014. Epub 2014 Sep 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25213641 (View on PubMed)

Barbosa FT, Castro AA, de Sousa-Rodrigues CF. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during anaesthesia for prevention of mortality and postoperative pulmonary complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 12;2014(6):CD007922. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007922.pub3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24919591 (View on PubMed)

Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 28;369(22):2126-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208707. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24283226 (View on PubMed)

Fahy BG, Barnas GM, Nagle SE, Flowers JL, Njoku MJ, Agarwal M. Changes in lung and chest wall properties with abdominal insufflation of carbon dioxide are immediately reversible. Anesth Analg. 1996 Mar;82(3):501-5. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199603000-00013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8623951 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CP-EIT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.