Upfront Surgery Versus NeoAdjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery for Resectable Advanced Gastric Cancer: SNAC Study

NCT ID: NCT06472063

Last Updated: 2024-06-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

684 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-22

Study Completion Date

2024-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Based on the concerns about the actual low strength of evidence of the efficacy of NAC on survival of proper gastric cancer treated with adequate D2 gastrectomy as compared to the results of optimal upfront surgery (S), and considering the actual difficulties of additional RCTs, the aim of this study is to assess the non-inferiority of upfront surgery alone with optimal D2 dissection compared to NAC regimens followed by surgery. Methods: This is a nationwide Multicenter observational retrospective study with matched comparison of two therapeutic strategies (NAC vs S). We will include patients with cT\>2, every cN M0, or with every T and N+ M0, histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach, submitted either to pre- or peri-operative treatment and D2 gastrectomy or to upfront D2 gastrectomy, between January 2012 and December 2019, followed by adjuvant treatment when recommended.

All patients matching the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be registered into the study and classified into one of the two arms: a, patients who underwent pre- or perioperative treatment and D2 gastrectomy (NAC) or b, patients submitted to upfront D2 gastrectomy (S). Given the results reported in the "FLOT" trial, a 3-years OS of 55% in the control arm (NAC) was assumed. Three-year OS in the experimental arm (S) was assumed to be 47.4% under the null hypothesis of inferiority and 55% under the alternative hypothesis of non-inferiority. A sample size of 684 patients (342 in each arm) achieves 80% power to detect a non-inferiority margin Hazard Ratio of 1.25

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastric Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

upfront D2 gastrectomy (S)

patients submitted to upfront D2 gastrectomy

No interventions assigned to this group

pre- or perioperative treatment and D2 gastrectomy (NAC)

patients who underwent pre- or perioperative treatment and D2 gastrectomy

pre- or perioperative treatment and D2 gastrectomy

Intervention Type OTHER

pre- or perioperative treatment and D2 gastrectomy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

pre- or perioperative treatment and D2 gastrectomy

pre- or perioperative treatment and D2 gastrectomy

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

perioperative treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 3.1.1. Locally advanced (T\>2 any N or N+ any T) histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach without distant metastases (M0) and without infiltration of adjacent structures and organs.

3.1.2. D2 lymphadenectomy (based on Japanese gastric cancer guideline) 3.1.3. Age \> 18 years 3.1.4. surgical resectability 3.1.5. follow-up time of at least 36 months.

Exclusion Criteria

3.2.1. distant metastases (cM+) or infiltration of adjacent structures or organs (cT4b) and all primarily not resectable stages 3.2.2. Other types of lymphadenectomy lower than D2 3.2.3. Siewert type I and II Cardia cancers 3.2.2. Relapsed gastric cancers 3.2.3. malignant secondary disease, dated back \< 5 years (exception: In-situ-carcinoma of the cervix uteri, adequately treated skin basal cell carcinoma)

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Federico II University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico Modena

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Istituti Tumori Giovanni Paolo II

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Anna

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ospedale di Circolo - Fondazione Macchi

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ospedale San Donato

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Government hospital in Forlì, Italy

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Azienda ULSS di Verona e Provincia

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

A.O. Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Provincia Autonoma di Trento

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Florence

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ospedale M. Bufalini Cesena

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto, Piacenza

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo di Monza

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

A.O.U. CittĂ  della Salute e della Scienza

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ospedale Santo Stefano

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Policlinico Abano Terme

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Istituto Europeo di Oncologia

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Azienda Ospedaliera OO.RR. S. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Humanitas Hospital, Italy

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rossella Reddavid

MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

San Luigi University Hospital

Orbassano, Piedmont, Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Rossella Reddavid, MD

Role: CONTACT

+393479848651

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SNAC01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.