Neo-adjuvant Chemo + Peritonectomy + Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemo in Peritoneal Carcinomatosis From Gastric Cancer
NCT ID: NCT01379482
Last Updated: 2014-05-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
18 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-01-31
2009-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Gastrectomy + Cytoreductive Surgery + HIPEC for Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Dissemination.
NCT03348150
HIPEC and Systemic Chemotherapy Combined With Apatinib in Unresectable Peritoneal Metastases From Gastric Cancer
NCT03349827
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy With Cisplatin and Paclitaxel for the Treatment of Patients With Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma at High Risk of Peritoneal Recurrence
NCT07139951
Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel and Systemic Therapy Versus Systemic Therapy Alone in Gastric Cancer Patients With Peritoneal Metastasis
NCT07304271
A Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Systemic Chemotherapy and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Combined With Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Gastric Cancer Patients With Peritoneal Metastasis
NCT06685887
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients Eighteen patients (eight female and ten male), with a median age of 57 years (range 38-74), were included in the study. Treatment began with three months' (range 2-4.5) neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy. Four weeks after receiving the last course of chemotherapy, patients with no clinical and radiological signs of tumour progression underwent laparotomy in preparation for CRS+HIPEC followed by EPIC for five days. Patients with clinical and radiological signs of tumour progression during the neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy did not undergo the planned loco-regional treatment but continued with palliative systemic chemotherapy at the discretion of the physician in charge of the patient.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy The intention was to treat the patients with combination chemotherapy for three months. The choice of chemotherapy was individualised, but all patients received optimal drug combinations suitable for good performance patients with metastatic gastric cancer.
Routine clinical controls and blood sampling were done before every treatment cycle. In order to rule out patients with progressive disease and distant metastasis, abdominal and thoracic CT scan evaluations were performed prior to surgery.
Surgical treatment Depending on disease extent, CRS was performed as described by Sugarbaker. Immediately postoperatively, tumour load and completeness of cytoreduction for PC were recorded using the Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) \[12\] and Completeness of Cytoreduction scores (CC) respectively. The PCI (range 1-39) consists of lesion size scores in 13 different regions of the abdomen: 0=no tumour seen, 1=tumour up to 0.5 cm, 2=tumour up to 5 cm and 3=tumour\>5 cm. The PCI score is calculated by adding together the lesion size scores for the 13 regions. The CC score is based upon the size of tumour left after cytoreduction: CC0=no peritoneal seeding visible, CC1=nodules up to 2.5 mm, CC2=nodules up to 2.5 cm and CC3=nodules\>2.5 cm.
HIPEC and EPIC HIPEC was administered according to the Coliseum technique and was combined with EPIC for five days. Before perfusion, the patient's body temperature was lowered to 35°C with a cooling blanket (Allon®). The intra-abdominal temperature during perfusion ranged from 42°C to 44°C. Four intra-abdominal drains were left in place after surgery and EPIC was given daily during the first five postoperative days.
Tumour markers, histopathology and adverse events Five serum tumour markers (CEA, CA 125, CA 19-9, CA 15-3 and CA 72-4) were taken one to six days before surgery and ten days after surgery, to analyse the frequency of the impact of gastric cancer with PC on these tumour markers.
The sixth edition of the TNM classification was used. The presence of signet ring cells and the grade of differentiation according to Lauren's classification were reported.
Therapy-related adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute's common toxicity criteria (NCI-CTC) version 3.0. OS was calculated for all patients from the date of the first neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Statistical methods All analyses were performed on the basis of intention-to-treat. OS and disease-free survival (DFS) were analysed for patients treated with CC0. Results were presented as the median, with a 95% confidence interval (CI). A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The computer software package STATISTICA AXA version 10.0, StatSoft Scandinavia, Sweden, was used for statistical evaluation of the survival data.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Multimodal treatment
Neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy followed by cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy
Multimodal treatment
3 months (range 2-4.5) with neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy. Four weeks after receiving the last course of chemotherapy, patients will undergo laparotomy with the objective of performing cytoreduction + hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.
Early peritoneal chemotherapy though intrabdominal drains for the first five postoperative days.
Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy:
Irinotecan+Nordic FLv (6 pat.) EOX (6 pat.) FLOX (3 pat.) Docetaxel+Irinotecan+5-FU+LV (1 pat.) FOLFIRI (1 pat.) ECF (1 pat.)
Hyperthermic intraoperative chemotherapy:
Cisplatin+doxorubicin (5 pat.). Oxaliplatin +concomitant i.v. 5-FU+ i.v. LV (3 pat.)
Early postoperative chemotherapy:
5-FU + i.v. LV (5 pat.) Paclitaxel (1 pat.)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Multimodal treatment
3 months (range 2-4.5) with neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy. Four weeks after receiving the last course of chemotherapy, patients will undergo laparotomy with the objective of performing cytoreduction + hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.
Early peritoneal chemotherapy though intrabdominal drains for the first five postoperative days.
Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy:
Irinotecan+Nordic FLv (6 pat.) EOX (6 pat.) FLOX (3 pat.) Docetaxel+Irinotecan+5-FU+LV (1 pat.) FOLFIRI (1 pat.) ECF (1 pat.)
Hyperthermic intraoperative chemotherapy:
Cisplatin+doxorubicin (5 pat.). Oxaliplatin +concomitant i.v. 5-FU+ i.v. LV (3 pat.)
Early postoperative chemotherapy:
5-FU + i.v. LV (5 pat.) Paclitaxel (1 pat.)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Adequate renal-, hematopoietic- and liver functions
* WHO performance status (WHO) of \< 2.
Exclusion Criteria
* Surgically not resectable lymph-node metastasis
* Contraindication to chemotherapy treatment
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Uppsala University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Haile Mahteme, Ass prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Uppsala University, Sweden
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Uppsala University
Uppsala, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
43145
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2007/073
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.