Neo-adjuvant Chemo + Peritonectomy + Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemo in Peritoneal Carcinomatosis From Gastric Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01379482

Last Updated: 2014-05-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-01-31

Study Completion Date

2009-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aims of this study are to investigate whether multimodal treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer is feasible and to evaluate the clinical outcomes and clinical effectiveness of neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy followed by cytoreductive surgery + hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy + early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy, as compared to systemic chemotherapy only, in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Between January 2005 and March 2009, 18 consecutive patients with PC from gastric cancer were scheduled for neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy followed by CRS+HIPEC+EPIC at Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden. The regional ethics committee approved the study and informed consent was obtained from each patient and the study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, with identifier NCT01379482. The eligibility requirements for treatment were: histologically confirmed diagnosis of primary gastric adenocarcinoma; histologically and radiologically confirmed PC diagnosis; no distant metastases; adequate renal, haematopoietic and liver functions, and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of \> 70. Table 1 summarises demographic and basic clinical patient data.

Patients Eighteen patients (eight female and ten male), with a median age of 57 years (range 38-74), were included in the study. Treatment began with three months' (range 2-4.5) neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy. Four weeks after receiving the last course of chemotherapy, patients with no clinical and radiological signs of tumour progression underwent laparotomy in preparation for CRS+HIPEC followed by EPIC for five days. Patients with clinical and radiological signs of tumour progression during the neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy did not undergo the planned loco-regional treatment but continued with palliative systemic chemotherapy at the discretion of the physician in charge of the patient.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy The intention was to treat the patients with combination chemotherapy for three months. The choice of chemotherapy was individualised, but all patients received optimal drug combinations suitable for good performance patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

Routine clinical controls and blood sampling were done before every treatment cycle. In order to rule out patients with progressive disease and distant metastasis, abdominal and thoracic CT scan evaluations were performed prior to surgery.

Surgical treatment Depending on disease extent, CRS was performed as described by Sugarbaker. Immediately postoperatively, tumour load and completeness of cytoreduction for PC were recorded using the Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) \[12\] and Completeness of Cytoreduction scores (CC) respectively. The PCI (range 1-39) consists of lesion size scores in 13 different regions of the abdomen: 0=no tumour seen, 1=tumour up to 0.5 cm, 2=tumour up to 5 cm and 3=tumour\>5 cm. The PCI score is calculated by adding together the lesion size scores for the 13 regions. The CC score is based upon the size of tumour left after cytoreduction: CC0=no peritoneal seeding visible, CC1=nodules up to 2.5 mm, CC2=nodules up to 2.5 cm and CC3=nodules\>2.5 cm.

HIPEC and EPIC HIPEC was administered according to the Coliseum technique and was combined with EPIC for five days. Before perfusion, the patient's body temperature was lowered to 35°C with a cooling blanket (Allon®). The intra-abdominal temperature during perfusion ranged from 42°C to 44°C. Four intra-abdominal drains were left in place after surgery and EPIC was given daily during the first five postoperative days.

Tumour markers, histopathology and adverse events Five serum tumour markers (CEA, CA 125, CA 19-9, CA 15-3 and CA 72-4) were taken one to six days before surgery and ten days after surgery, to analyse the frequency of the impact of gastric cancer with PC on these tumour markers.

The sixth edition of the TNM classification was used. The presence of signet ring cells and the grade of differentiation according to Lauren's classification were reported.

Therapy-related adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute's common toxicity criteria (NCI-CTC) version 3.0. OS was calculated for all patients from the date of the first neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Statistical methods All analyses were performed on the basis of intention-to-treat. OS and disease-free survival (DFS) were analysed for patients treated with CC0. Results were presented as the median, with a 95% confidence interval (CI). A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The computer software package STATISTICA AXA version 10.0, StatSoft Scandinavia, Sweden, was used for statistical evaluation of the survival data.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Gastric Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Multimodal treatment

Neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy followed by cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Multimodal treatment

Intervention Type DRUG

3 months (range 2-4.5) with neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy. Four weeks after receiving the last course of chemotherapy, patients will undergo laparotomy with the objective of performing cytoreduction + hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Early peritoneal chemotherapy though intrabdominal drains for the first five postoperative days.

Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy:

Irinotecan+Nordic FLv (6 pat.) EOX (6 pat.) FLOX (3 pat.) Docetaxel+Irinotecan+5-FU+LV (1 pat.) FOLFIRI (1 pat.) ECF (1 pat.)

Hyperthermic intraoperative chemotherapy:

Cisplatin+doxorubicin (5 pat.). Oxaliplatin +concomitant i.v. 5-FU+ i.v. LV (3 pat.)

Early postoperative chemotherapy:

5-FU + i.v. LV (5 pat.) Paclitaxel (1 pat.)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Multimodal treatment

3 months (range 2-4.5) with neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy. Four weeks after receiving the last course of chemotherapy, patients will undergo laparotomy with the objective of performing cytoreduction + hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Early peritoneal chemotherapy though intrabdominal drains for the first five postoperative days.

Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy:

Irinotecan+Nordic FLv (6 pat.) EOX (6 pat.) FLOX (3 pat.) Docetaxel+Irinotecan+5-FU+LV (1 pat.) FOLFIRI (1 pat.) ECF (1 pat.)

Hyperthermic intraoperative chemotherapy:

Cisplatin+doxorubicin (5 pat.). Oxaliplatin +concomitant i.v. 5-FU+ i.v. LV (3 pat.)

Early postoperative chemotherapy:

5-FU + i.v. LV (5 pat.) Paclitaxel (1 pat.)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Irinotecan+Nordic FLv (6 pat.) EOX (6 pat.) FLOX (3 pat.) Docetaxel+Irinotecan+5-FU+LV (1 pat.) FOLFIRI (1 pat.) ECF (1 pat.) Cisplatin+doxorubicin (5 pat.). Oxaliplatin +concomitant i.v. 5-FU+ i.v. LV (3 pat.) 5-FU + i.v. LV (5 pat.) Paclitaxel (1 pat.)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histologically confirmed diagnosis of primary gastric cancer + histologically and/or radiologically confirmed peritoneal carcinomatosis diagnosis
* Adequate renal-, hematopoietic- and liver functions
* WHO performance status (WHO) of \< 2.

Exclusion Criteria

* Distant metastases
* Surgically not resectable lymph-node metastasis
* Contraindication to chemotherapy treatment
Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Uppsala University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Haile Mahteme, Ass prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Uppsala University, Sweden

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Uppsala University

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

43145

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2007/073

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.