Study on Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving No. 10 Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Gastric Cancer

NCT ID: NCT02845986

Last Updated: 2020-02-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

251 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-01

Study Completion Date

2020-10-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to explore the safety and feasibility of the Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving No. 10 Lymph Node Dissection for patients with locally advanced upper third gastric adenocarcinoma(cT2-4a, N-/+, M0).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Radical resection is still the primary method of treating advanced gastric cancer.According to the Japanese treatment guidelines for gastric cancer, D2 lymphadenectomy, including No. 10 lymph node dissection, should be adopted for upper third gastric carcinoma.The incidence of No. 10 lymph node metastasis is high in advanced proximal gastric cancer, reported to range from 9.8%-20.9%, and the presence of No. 10 lymph node metastasis is closely related to survival. Therefore, in East Asia, D2 lymph node dissection of potentially curable locally advanced upper third gastric cancer including No. 10 lymph node is the standard surgical treatment.

In the early, splenectomy was performed to remove No. 10 lymph node. With the improvement of medical knowledge and surgical technique, spleen-preserving No. 10 lymph node dissection has been recognized by more and more surgeons. However, due to the special and complex anatomy of the spleen, spleen-preserving No. 10 lymph node dissection is difficult, even in open surgery; consequently, the surgery cannot be performed in many centers.

Laparoscopic surgery has distinct minimally invasive advantages, such as small incisions, less blood loss, less postoperative pain, mild postoperative inflammatory reactions, a quick recovery of gastrointestinal function, shorter hospital stays and obvious cosmetic effects. Since Kitano et al. first reported laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in 1994, laparoscopic techniques have developed rapidly. The techniques are becoming increasingly mature, making it possible to perform laparoscopic spleen-preserving No. 10 lymph node dissection. Our center first proposed "Huang's three-step maneuver", a new operative method suitable for laparoscopic spleen-preserving No. 10 lymph node dissection. This method simplifies the procedure of laparoscopic spleen-preserving No. 10 lymph node dissection and facilitates its popularization and promotion.

However, it remains a controversial international issue if it is safe and feasible to routinely conduct laparoscopic spleen-preserving No. 10 lymph node dissection for advanced upper third gastric cancer.A number of retrospective studies have successively confirmed the safety, feasibility and oncological efficacy of laparoscopic spleen-preserving No. 10 lymph node dissection.But there is no multicenter prospective studies to identify the results.

Therefore, The study is through a prospective, multicenter, open, single-arm, non-inferiority study,to explore the safety and feasibility of the laparoscopic spleen-preserving No. 10 lymph node dissection for patients with locally advanced upper third gastric adenocarcinoma(cT2-4a, N-/+, M0).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stomach Neoplasms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

No.10 lymph node dissections

Patients with locally advanced upper third gastric carcinoma will performed laparoscopic spleen-preserving No.10 lymph node dissections.After the surgery the patients will be treated with oxaliplatin or platinum-based chemotherapy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving No.10 Lymph Node Dissections

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After exclusion of T4b, bulky lymph nodes, or distant metastasis case et al. Laparoscopic spleen-preserving No.10 lymph node dissections will be performed with curative treated intent in patients with locally advanced upper third gastric adenocarcinoma.

oxaliplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

oxaliplatin or platinum-based chemotherapy is used when the patients undergo adjuvant chemotherapy after the surgery.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving No.10 Lymph Node Dissections

After exclusion of T4b, bulky lymph nodes, or distant metastasis case et al. Laparoscopic spleen-preserving No.10 lymph node dissections will be performed with curative treated intent in patients with locally advanced upper third gastric adenocarcinoma.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

oxaliplatin

oxaliplatin or platinum-based chemotherapy is used when the patients undergo adjuvant chemotherapy after the surgery.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

platinum-based chemotherapy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age between 18 to 75 years old
2. Primary gastric adenocarcinoma (papillary, tubular, mucinous, signet ring cell, or poorly differentiated) confirmed pathologically by endoscopic biopsy
3. Locally advanced tumor in the upper third stomach(cT2-4a, N-/+, M0 at preoperative evaluation according to the AJCC(American Joint Committee on Cancer) Cancer Staging Manual Seventh Edition)
4. No distant metastasis, no direct invasion of pancreas, spleen or other organs nearby in the preoperative examinations
5. Performance status of 0 or 1 on ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) scale
6. ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) class I to III
7. Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Pregnant and lactating women
2. Suffering from severe mental disorder
3. History of previous upper abdominal surgery (except for laparoscopic cholecystectomy)
4. History of previous gastric surgery (including ESD/EMR (Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection/Endoscopic Mucosal Resection )for gastric cancer)
5. Enlarged or bulky regional lymph node (diameter over 3cm)supported by preoperative imaging including enlarged or bulky No.10 lymph node
6. History of other malignant disease within the past 5 years
7. History of previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy
8. History of unstable angina or myocardial infarction within the past 6 months
9. History of cerebrovascular accident within the past 6 months
10. History of continuous systematic administration of corticosteroids within 1 month
11. Requirement of simultaneous surgery for other disease
12. Emergency surgery due to complication (bleeding, obstruction or perforation) caused by gastric cancer
13. FEV1\<50% of the predicted values
14. Splenectomy must be performed due to the obvious tumor invasion in spleen or spleen blood vessels.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Southwest Hospital, China

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fujian Provincial Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Zhangzhou Municipal Hospital of Fujian Province

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Meizhou People's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Second Hospital of Jilin University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

RenJi Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

West China Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The First Hospital of Putian City, Putian, Fujian

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Longyan City First Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fujian Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Chang-Ming Huang, Prof.

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Changming Huang, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fujian Medical University Union Hospital,China

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beijing Cancer Hospital

Haidian, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status

Southwest Hospital

Shapingba, Chongqing Municipality, China

Site Status

Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

Fuzhou, Fujian, China

Site Status

Fujian Provincial Hospital

Fuzhou, Fujian, China

Site Status

Longyan First Hospital

Longyan, Fujian, China

Site Status

The First Hospital of Putian City

Putian, Fujian, China

Site Status

The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University

Xiamen, Fujian, China

Site Status

Zhangzhou Municipal Hospital of Fujian Province

Zhangzhou, Fujian, China

Site Status

Guangdong General Hospital

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Meizhou People's Hospital

Meizhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Jiangsu province hospital

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status

The Second Hospital of Jilin University

Changchun, Jilin, China

Site Status

Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital

Xining, Qinghai, China

Site Status

Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Pudong, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

Xuhui, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University

Xi’an, Shanxi, China

Site Status

West China Hospital, Sichuan University

Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Site Status

The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University

Xinjiang, Xinjiang, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011 Jun;14(2):113-23. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0042-4. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21573742 (View on PubMed)

Monig SP, Collet PH, Baldus SE, Schmackpfeffer K, Schroder W, Thiele J, Dienes HP, Holscher AH. Splenectomy in proximal gastric cancer: frequency of lymph node metastasis to the splenic hilus. J Surg Oncol. 2001 Feb;76(2):89-92. doi: 10.1002/1096-9098(200102)76:23.0.co;2-i.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11223832 (View on PubMed)

Chikara K, Hiroshi S, Masato N, Goro M, Yuichi O, Hidetaka O, Hirotoshi A. Association of the number of metastatic perigastric lymph nodes with long-term survival in gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2005 Jan-Feb;52(61):277-80.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15783049 (View on PubMed)

Bonenkamp JJ, Hermans J, Sasako M, van de Velde CJ, Welvaart K, Songun I, Meyer S, Plukker JT, Van Elk P, Obertop H, Gouma DJ, van Lanschot JJ, Taat CW, de Graaf PW, von Meyenfeldt MF, Tilanus H; Dutch Gastric Cancer Group. Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999 Mar 25;340(12):908-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199903253401202.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 10089184 (View on PubMed)

Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994 Apr;4(2):146-8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 8180768 (View on PubMed)

Hyung WJ, Lim JS, Song J, Choi SH, Noh SH. Laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection during total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Aug;207(2):e6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.04.027. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18656040 (View on PubMed)

Okabe H, Obama K, Kan T, Tanaka E, Itami A, Sakai Y. Medial approach for laparoscopic total gastrectomy with splenic lymph node dissection. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Jul;211(1):e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.04.006. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20610241 (View on PubMed)

Hur H, Jeon HM, Kim W. Laparoscopic pancreas- and spleen-preserving D2 lymph node dissection in advanced (cT2) upper-third gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2008 Feb 1;97(2):169-72. doi: 10.1002/jso.20927.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18095269 (View on PubMed)

Schwarz RE. Spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy at the time of gastrectomy for cancer: technical feasibility and early results. J Surg Oncol. 2002 Jan;79(1):73-6. doi: 10.1002/jso.10036. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11754382 (View on PubMed)

Tanimura S, Higashino M, Fukunaga Y, Kishida S, Ogata A, Fujiwara Y, Osugi H. Laparoscopic gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection for upper gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2007 Feb;94(2):204-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5542.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17058319 (View on PubMed)

Huang CM, Chen QY, Lin JX, Zheng CH, Li P, Xie JW. Huang's three-step maneuver for laparoscopic spleen-preserving No. 10 lymph node dissection for advanced proximal gastric cancer. Chin J Cancer Res. 2014 Apr;26(2):208-10. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2014.04.05.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24826062 (View on PubMed)

Jung MR, Park YK, Seon JW, Kim KY, Cheong O, Ryu SY. Definition and classification of complications of gastrectomy for gastric cancer based on the accordion severity grading system. World J Surg. 2012 Oct;36(10):2400-11. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1693-y.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22752074 (View on PubMed)

Orsenigo E, Bissolati M, Socci C, Chiari D, Muffatti F, Nifosi J, Staudacher C. Duodenal stump fistula after gastric surgery for malignancies: a retrospective analysis of risk factors in a single centre experience. Gastric Cancer. 2014 Oct;17(4):733-44. doi: 10.1007/s10120-013-0327-x. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24399492 (View on PubMed)

Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M; International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005 Jul;138(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16003309 (View on PubMed)

Holte K, Kehlet H. Postoperative ileus: a preventable event. Br J Surg. 2000 Nov;87(11):1480-93. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01595.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11091234 (View on PubMed)

Asgeirsson T, El-Badawi KI, Mahmood A, Barletta J, Luchtefeld M, Senagore AJ. Postoperative ileus: it costs more than you expect. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Feb;210(2):228-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.028. Epub 2009 Nov 18.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20113944 (View on PubMed)

Arozullah AM, Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley J; Participants in the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Development and validation of a multifactorial risk index for predicting postoperative pneumonia after major noncardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med. 2001 Nov 20;135(10):847-57. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-10-200111200-00005.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11712875 (View on PubMed)

Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;13(10):606-8. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 1334988 (View on PubMed)

Dong K, Yu XJ, Li B, Wen EG, Xiong W, Guan QL. Advances in mechanisms of postsurgical gastroparesis syndrome and its diagnosis and treatment. Chin J Dig Dis. 2006;7(2):76-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-9573.2006.00255.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16643334 (View on PubMed)

Kaas R, Rustman LD, Zoetmulder FA. Chylous ascites after oncological abdominal surgery: incidence and treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001 Mar;27(2):187-9. doi: 10.1053/ejso.2000.1088.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11289756 (View on PubMed)

Assumpcao L, Cameron JL, Wolfgang CL, Edil B, Choti MA, Herman JM, Geschwind JF, Hong K, Georgiades C, Schulick RD, Pawlik TM. Incidence and management of chyle leaks following pancreatic resection: a high volume single-center institutional experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Nov;12(11):1915-23. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0619-3. Epub 2008 Aug 7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18685899 (View on PubMed)

Greenblatt DY, Kelly KJ, Rajamanickam V, Wan Y, Hanson T, Rettammel R, Winslow ER, Cho CS, Weber SM. Preoperative factors predict perioperative morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Aug;18(8):2126-35. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1594-6. Epub 2011 Feb 20.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21336514 (View on PubMed)

Xu BB, Zheng HL, Chen CS, Xu LL, Xue Z, Wei LH, Zheng HH, Shen LL, Zheng CH, Li P, Xie JW, Lin JX, Zheng YH, Huang CM. Development and validation of a preoperative radiomics-based nomogram to identify patients who can benefit from splenic hilar lymphadenectomy: a pooled analysis of three prospective trials. Int J Surg. 2024 Jul 1;110(7):4053-4061. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001337.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38980664 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.