Comparison of Long-term Outcomes Between Upfront Surgery and Neoadjuvant Therapy Followed by Surgery in Patients with Node-Negative Gastric Cancer

NCT ID: NCT06673472

Last Updated: 2024-11-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1081 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-05-01

Study Completion Date

2024-09-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with lymph node-negative gastric cancer, the prognosis of patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy was poor than that of those who had upfront surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological data of patients who underwent curative surgery for gastric cancer and were pathologically confirmed to have node-negative metastases between January 2010 and June 2021 at 8 institutions in China. Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2020) were used as the validation cohort. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received neoadjuvant therapy before surgery: the upfront surgery (UFS) group and the neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery (NATS) group. A 1:1 propensity score matching analysis was employed to reduce the potential selection bias between the two groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lymph Node-negative Gastric Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

(1) preoperative clinical staging of cT2-4NxM0; (2) primary gastric adenocarcinoma confirmed via pathology; (3) no distant metastasis to the liver, lungs, or abdominal cavity as confirmed through preoperative chest X-ray or chest CT, abdominal ultrasound, and abdominal CT; (4) underwent radical gastrectomy (R0) and D2 lymphadenectomy; (5) postoperative pathology confirmed no lymph node metastasis (i.e., lymph node-negative); and (6) follow-up for at least 3 years.

Exclusion Criteria

(1) considered early-stage gastric cancer before surgery; (2) distant metastasis detected preoperatively or intraoperatively; (3) failure to achieve R0 resection and D2 lymphadenectomy during surgery; (4) concurrent diagnosis of other malignancies; (5) remnant gastric cancer; (6) death within 30 days postoperatively; and (7) incomplete baseline data or follow-up records.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chang-Ming Huang, Prof.

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Chang-Ming Huang, Prof.

Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Chang-Ming Huang

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chang-ming

Fuzhou, Fujian, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024KY217

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.