Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Haptotherapeutic Well-Being Scale
NCT ID: NCT06467188
Last Updated: 2024-06-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
252 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-10-20
2023-12-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Design: The study was methodological type. Methods: The study conducted between October 20 and December 20, 2023, with 242 women who volunteered to participate by sharing forum pages on social media (Facebook, Instagram) via the web. Data were collected using a personal information form, including sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics and the Haptotherapeutic Well-Being Scale.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Breast Massage and Hot Compress Application to Mothers With Premature Babies at Newborn Intensive Care University Effect on Milk Release and Anxiety
NCT05420389
The Effect of Infant Calming Education on Maternal Role Perception, Maternal Attachment and Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy
NCT05594836
Effects of Massage and Shower on Birth Experience and Breastfeeding
NCT07151144
Hydrotherapy in Labor: Outcomes for Pain, Birth, and Breastfeeding
NCT07031635
The Effect of Back Massage Applied to Mothers in the Early Postpartum Period on Parameters
NCT06200649
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Validity and reliability
In order to evaluate the content validity of the Turkish version of the scale, 12 expert researchers in the field of gynecology and obstetrics were consulted. The experts were asked to evaluate the items as 1-Not Appropriate, 2-Somewhat Appropriate, 3-Reasonably Appropriate, and 4-Very Appropriate. Experts were asked to suggest items not evaluated as "very appropriate". In the Davis technique, the content validity index which is calculated by dividing the number of experts who marked the options a (The item is appropriate) and b (The item needs minor revision) for each item by the total number of experts providing opinions is expected to be over 0.80 \[30\]. Based on expert opinions, the content validity index (CVI) value of the scale was calculated to be 96%, meaning that content validity was ensured. The items were reorganized by considering the experts' suggestions. The scale was administered to 252 women over 18 who were included in the study sample after scoring.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Trakya University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Burcu KUCUKKAYA
Assist. Prof.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Trakya University
Edirne, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kucukkaya B, Isik HK, Rathfisch G. Turkish validity and reliability of the Haptotherapeutic Well-Being Scale. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024 Aug 30;24(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12906-024-04613-z.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
14.09.2023-14
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.