Hydrotherapy in Labor: Outcomes for Pain, Birth, and Breastfeeding

NCT ID: NCT07031635

Last Updated: 2025-07-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-07-01

Study Completion Date

2025-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Warm showers are increasingly gaining attention for their positive impact on labor, yet studies on this topic in Turkey remain limited. No previous research has simultaneously evaluated the effects of warm showers on labor pain, duration, emotional state, and breastfeeding. As a simple, economical, accessible, and side-effect-free method, warm showers represent a practical and safe non-pharmacological option for pain relief and comfort during labor. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of hydrotherapy on labor pain, duration, breastfeeding, and emotional experience during childbirth.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Childbirth is an unforgettable and unique experience for women. However, labor can sometimes be painful, challenging, and anxiety-inducing. Severe labor pain can negatively affect a woman's sense of control during labor, causing stress that may impact the health of the mother, fetus, and newborn. Traumatic birth experiences may hinder maternal-infant bonding and breastfeeding. Factors such as delivery method, medical interventions, pain, and fatigue can delay the initiation of breastfeeding and complicate the mother's adjustment to her new role. In supportive, intervention-free birth environments, the need for analgesia and oxytocin is reduced, episiotomy rates are lower, maternal emotional experiences improve, and breastfeeding is initiated earlier.

In this context, non-pharmacological methods such as warm showers offer significant advantages during labor. Being easily accessible, economical, and free of side effects, warm showers help relax muscles, improve circulation, reduce labor pain, and support a more positive maternal approach to the birth process. They ease fear and stress, promote comfort, and increase birth satisfaction. Studies indicate that pregnant women find warm showers soothing and often prefer them over analgesics. However, studies in Turkey on this subject are limited, and comprehensive research evaluating the combined effects of warm showers on labor pain, duration, emotional state, and breastfeeding is lacking. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the effects of hydrotherapy during labor on these outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pregnancy Latent Phase

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized control study:

The pilot study was conducted between July 16 and August 15, 2024, with 10 primiparous pregnant women. Hydrotherapy was applied and the usability of data collection forms was assessed. Participants were satisfied with the application, and no revisions to the forms were needed.

Intervention Group:

When cervical dilation reached 5 cm, participants received a 30-minute warm shower, either standing or sitting based on their preference. Various assessment tools were used throughout labor, including the Visual Analog Scale, Labor Monitoring Form, LATCH Breastfeeding Scale, and Labor Affect Scale.

Control Group:

Aside from routine hospital procedures, no additional interventions were performed. The same assessment tools were applied during labor and postpartum.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
To prevent bias in the study sample, inclusion, exclusion, and withdrawal criteria were established.

The intervention was performed solely by the researcher, therefore performance bias could not be prevented.

Group assignments were done using random numbers generated by random.org, placed in opaque sealed envelopes, and assigned by an independent person not involved in the study. This ensured that participants were blinded to their group allocation.

All data were collected by the researcher, who was aware of the group assignments; thus, measurement bias could not be prevented. However, data analyses were conducted by an independent statistician not involved in the research process, preventing statistical bias.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

HYDROTHERAPY Group

Pregnant women who met the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate in the intervention group received a warm shower once cervical dilation reached 5 cm. Based on their preference, participants either stood or sat during the 30-minute shower. After random assignment, the participants in the intervention group completed the "Informed Consent Form," "Personal Information Form," and the "Visual Analog Scale (VAS)" upon admission to the delivery room. During the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th stages of labor, the "Labor Monitoring Form" was used, and the VAS was repeated immediately after the intervention, and again at 30 and 60 minutes. Breastfeeding status was assessed using the LATCH scale within the first two hours after birth, and emotional responses to birth were evaluated using the Labor Affect Scale.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Hydrotherapy (Warm Shower)

Intervention Type OTHER

Pregnant women who met the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate in the intervention group received a warm shower once cervical dilation reached 5 cm. Based on their preference, participants either stood or sat during the 30-minute shower.

Control group

In the control group, routine hospital procedures were followed, including admission, history-taking, informed consent, recording of vital signs, and connecting the mother to the non-stress test (NST) monitor. No additional intervention was administered. After random assignment, control group participants also completed the "Informed Consent Form," "Personal Information Form," and "Visual Analog Scale" at admission. The "Labor and Postpartum Monitoring Form" was used during the 1st through 4th stages of labor, and the VAS was repeated at 30 and 60 minutes after entering the active phase. Within the first two hours postpartum, breastfeeding was evaluated using the LATCH scale, and emotional responses to birth were assessed using the Labor Affect Scale.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hydrotherapy (Warm Shower)

Pregnant women who met the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate in the intervention group received a warm shower once cervical dilation reached 5 cm. Based on their preference, participants either stood or sat during the 30-minute shower.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Primiparous women who were expected to give birth vaginally
* Women who became pregnant spontaneously
* Women who were in the latent phase of labor upon admission
* Women who were not given oxytocin
* Women who were at term (38-42 weeks of gestation)
* Women who had a single healthy fetus in the vertex position
* Women who did not have any risk factors (such as preeclampsia, eclampsia, placenta previa, or placental abruption).

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women with any complications that could cause dystocia during labor (such as contraction abnormalities birth objects, birth canal dystocia, maternal psychological dystocia)
* Who are unable to move
* Who cannot speak, read, or understand Turkish
* Who have communication problems.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

49 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Health Institutes of Turkey

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Selcuk University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hacer ALAN DİKMEN

Assoc. Prof.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hacer Alan Dikmen, Assoc. Prof.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Selcuk Uni̇versi̇ty

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mardin Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi

Mardin, Midyat, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Thomson G, Feeley C, Moran VH, Downe S, Oladapo OT. Women's experiences of pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain relief methods for labour and childbirth: a qualitative systematic review. Reprod Health. 2019 May 30;16(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0735-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31146759 (View on PubMed)

Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain. 1983 Sep;17(1):45-56. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90126-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6226917 (View on PubMed)

Mallen-Perez L, Roe-Justiniano MT, Colome Ochoa N, Ferre Colomat A, Palacio M, Terre-Rull C. Use of hydrotherapy during labour: Assessment of pain, use of analgesia and neonatal safety. Enferm Clin (Engl Ed). 2018 Sep-Oct;28(5):309-315. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Nov 24. English, Spanish.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29239794 (View on PubMed)

M. (2018). "Comparing the effects of hot shower and intravenous injection of hyoscine on the pain intensity and duration of active phase of labour in nulliparous women". Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 12(8), QC07-QC11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Henrique AJ, Gabrielloni MC, Rodney P, Barbieri M. Non-pharmacological interventions during childbirth for pain relief, anxiety, and neuroendocrine stress parameters: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Pract. 2018 Jun;24(3):e12642. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12642. Epub 2018 Mar 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29512230 (View on PubMed)

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 766: Approaches to Limit Intervention During Labor and Birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):e164-e173. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003074.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30575638 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022/1177

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.