Automated Measures of Speech Intelligibility Using Brain Wave Recordings
NCT ID: NCT06402994
Last Updated: 2025-09-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-02-28
2025-06-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Evaluation of speech intelligibility is a fundamental component of hearing assessment and rehabilitation. The current gold standard in measuring speech intelligibility relies heavily on behavioural tests. While these tests are reliable and fast in healthy adults, it is challenging to assess speech intelligibility for patients who cannot communicate clearly, such as young children. For example, behavioral tests require active participation from the patient, such as raising their hand when a sound is heard, or repeating words and sentences.
Objective measures, for instance using electro-encephalography (EEG), could overcome the current challenges in hearing assessment and do not require active participation from the patient. For example, in Flanders, all newborns are screened with an objective test where a few sensors on the head detect brainwaves in response to sounds. However, objective tests only use simple sound stimuli, such as tones or clicks, which cannot be used to measure important high-level hearing outcomes, such as speech understanding. In other words, current objective tests are used to check if a person can hear a word, but they can't indicate if the person can understand the word.
An obvious missing link in audiological practice is a diagnostic test that can measure high-level hearing outcomes such as speech understanding in an objective way. For this reason, CORGEE was developed. CORGEE uses a novel method of "neural speech tracking" to objectively measure speech intelligibility using EEG. In the current study, the efficacy and the clinical validity of the CORGEE software will be evaluated in young children with a hearing impairment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the Effect of a Visio-Hearing Training Protocol on Spatial Hearing in Subjects With Hearing Loss
NCT04183348
Evaluation of the Global Auditory Nerve Activity for Exploration of Hearing in Humans
NCT03552224
Speech Intelligibility in Noise Using the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT)
NCT01309503
Training Listening Skills With the Inclusion of Cognitive Control
NCT05766020
Tracking Biomarkers of Speech Intelligibility
NCT05145946
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
We will evaluate the efficacy and the clinical validity of the CORGEE software by means of a within-subject cross-sectional study in infants, toddlers, kindergartners and primary school children. The study will be carried out in 90 children with (suspected) hearing impairment. Participants are recruited via four participating sites (one university hospital and three ambulatory revalidation centers) across a period of 12 months.
All participants will undergo an objective assessment of speech intelligibility based on electrophysiological responses to natural running speech, performed by their healthcare professional (HCP). Using the CORGEE device, neural tracking of the speech envelope will be investigated with and without hearing aids at different levels of speech intelligibility. With this clinical study, we aim to demonstrate an objective hearing aid benefit when listening to natural speech using EEG. Moreover, we aim to compare the objective results with behavioural measures of speech intelligibility obtained with standard-of-care assessments (speech audiometry). Additionally, by means of questionnaires we aim to determine the HCP's evaluation of the level of tolerance of the assessment for children, as well as the HCP's user experience and satisfaction with the CORGEE software. Finally, we will assess the usability of the CORGEE software as a counselling tool for persons with (suspected) hearing-related problems and their caregivers.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Infants & toddlers
Children between 0 and 2,5 years of age
Electrophysiological experiment
Neural envelope tracking to conversational speech at different intensities
Kindergartners
Children between 2,5 and 6 years of age
Electrophysiological experiment
Neural envelope tracking to conversational speech at different intensities
Speech audiometry
Speech perception assessment at different intensities
Primary school children
Children between 6 and 12 years of age
Electrophysiological experiment
Neural envelope tracking to conversational speech at different intensities
Speech audiometry
Speech perception assessment at different intensities
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Electrophysiological experiment
Neural envelope tracking to conversational speech at different intensities
Speech audiometry
Speech perception assessment at different intensities
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 0 - 2,5 years of age
* Bilateral hearing loss OR
* Suspicion of hearing loss (at least 1 criteria met): referred after FAIL on the new born hearing screening OR referred by the subject's paediatrician, general practitioner or otolaryngologist
* Voluntary written informed consent of the legally authorised representative
2. Subcategory 2 (Kindergartners)
* 2,5 - 6 years of age
* Going to kindergarten
* Bilateral hearing loss
* Using hearing aids regularly for at least three months
* Would be cooperative in behavioural testing
* Knowledge of Dutch (at least 1 criteria met): Dutch as mother tongue OR enrolled in Dutch speaking education
* Voluntary written informed consent of the legally authorised representative
3. Subcategory 3 (Primary school children)
* 6 - 12 years of age
* Going to primary school
* Bilateral hearing loss
* Using hearing aids regularly for at least three months
* Would be cooperative in behavioural testing
* Knowledge of Dutch (at least 1 criteria met): Dutch as mother tongue OR enrolled in Dutch speaking education
* Voluntary written informed consent of the legally authorised representative
Exclusion Criteria
* known brain injuries
* acute illness
0 Years
12 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
KOCA vzw
Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium
CAR Sint-Lievenspoort
Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
UZ Leuven
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
CAR Overleie
Kortrijk, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CIV-23-08-043833
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
S67892
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.