Fluid Challenge in Intensive Care The FENICE II Study

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

4734 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-01

Study Completion Date

2025-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Fluids are considered the primary treatment for critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), aiming to replace losses and or to enhance venous return, stroke volume, and consequently, cardiac output and tissue oxygen delivery. The modalities, volumes, and targets employed to titrate fluid therapy vary significantly in current clinical practice, as shown by the original FENICE study 10 years ago. FENICE studied how fluid challenges are given at the bedside. Very little is known about how this practice has changed since, how fluid administration (maintenance) is performed in general, and how the modality may impact outcomes. FENICE II is designed to explore these issues.

Objectives:

To provide a comprehensive global description of fluid administration modalities during the initial days of ICU admission and to explore any association between fluid administration characteristics and clinical outcomes.

To describe the fluid challenge administration modality and appraise the use of variables and functional hemodynamic tests to guide bolus infusion.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

"Mini Fluid Challenge Assessment: a Comparison Among Three Hemodynamic Tools"

NCT04934943

Sepsis Shock, Septic Critically Ill

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Transcutaneous pO2, Transcutaneous pCO2 and Central Venous SO2 Variations to Define Fluid Responsiveness

NCT01941472

Hypotension Shock Fluid Challenge +1 more

COMPLETED NA

Cumulative Fluids Balance and Ventilator Associated Events

NCT05556694

Ventilator Associated Event

COMPLETED

Validation of the Fluid Responsiveness Index in Critically Ill Patients

NCT00894309

Shock Critically Ill

UNKNOWN

Mini Bolus for Fluid Challenge Responsiveness in the Emergency Department

NCT05369559

Fluid Therapy

RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Primary aim: The primary aim is to describe the modality of fluid administration during the first 5 days of ICU stay considering 1) the overall fluid balance; 2) the characteristics of the fluids given; 3) the modality of fluid administration.

Secondary aims:

* To explore any association between fluid administration characteristics and clinical outcomes (see further)
* To evaluate factors potentially associated with the respective proportion of the different modalities of fluid administration
* To characterize FC administration modality in a large cohort of ICU patients.

Statistical Analysis:

Data will be described as median and interquartile range (IQR) or number and percentage. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact test and continuous variables using the nonparametric Wilcoxon test, Mann-Whitney test, or Kruskal-Wallis test.

Volume of fluid and fluid balance (primary outcome) will be reported as median \[IQR\] from day 1 to day 5. This volume, fluid balance and respective volume of bolus and continuous fluid administration will be reported as distinct alluvial plots reporting median of fluid at day 1 to 5 per quartile along with outcome.

In way to assess relationship between volume of fluid received, characteristics and outcome (secondary outcome), longitudinal cluster modelling will be used to identify clusters of patients with similar patterns of fluid administration profile. Longitudinal k-mean will be used to assess change in fluid received each day from day 1 to day 3. In way to avoid misinterpretation of findings due to time dependent competing events such death or ICU discharge, this analysis will be performed on patients alive and still in the ICU at day 3. A sensitivity analysis will be performed during first 5 days on the subgroup of patients alive and not discharged during first 5 ICU-days.

In way to assess impact of fluid administration modality/strategy on outcome (secondary endpoint), factors associated with in-hospital mortality, including identified cluster of fluid administration, will be assessed using mixed logistic regression where in-hospital mortality will be event of interest. Center effect will be included as a random effect against the intercept.

For secondary outcomes, and in particular for day-30 mortality, number of days alive without vasopressors, mechanical ventilation or renal replacement therapy, will be assessed using survival analysis.

All tests will be two-sided, and P-value less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critical Illness Septic Shock

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fluid administration (any type)

The fluid challenge (FC) (bolus) is defined as the administration of any bolus of fluid (crystalloid or colloid) which is expected to affect pressure/flow/perfusion variables. The FC is expected to be completed within 30 min.

Intervention Type OTHER