Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
49 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-04-08
2020-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The role of this small-dose (the so called mini-FC) has been recently tested to assess if the infusion of a small amount of fluids (100 ml in 1 minute) could predict the final effect of the residual aliquot (i.e., 250 ml of FC test subdivided as follows: 100 ml in 1 minute and 150 ml in 9 minutes). Both the sudden increase in the stroke volume and the reduction of PPV and SVV after a bolus of 100 ml of crystalloids administered in 1 minute showed high sensitivity and specificity in predicting the final outcome of the FC.
The primary aim of the present study is assess whether the does the rate of infusion of fluid challenge affect fluid responsiveness in neurosurgical supine patients.
The secondary aim is to assess the reliability of the changes in SV, PPV and SVV after a mini-FC test in predicting the final fluid responsiveness.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
"Mini Fluid Challenge Assessment: a Comparison Among Three Hemodynamic Tools"
NCT04934943
Mini Fluid chAlleNge and End-expiratory Occlusion Test and to Assess flUid responsiVEness in opeRating Room
NCT03808753
The Effectiveness of Mini-fluid Challenge in Predicting Fluid Responsiveness During Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery
NCT03731377
Response to Varying the Rate of Administration of a Fluid Challenge
NCT03300323
Hemodynamic Response to the End-expiratory Occlusion Test to Titrate Fluid Challenge in Operating Room.
NCT06627907
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Fluid therapy is commonly used in critically ill and surgical patients to restore hemodynamics. The aim of volume expansion is to increase cardiac index and oxygen delivery and to improve tissue oxygenation. However, this occurs only in a situation of preload dependency (i.e. when the ventricle operates on the steep part of the Frank-Starling's curve). Moreover, giving fluids to a non-volume-responsive patient (preload independency) can result in detrimental pulmonary and interstitial oedema. Fluid responsiveness (i.e., increase in stroke volume, SV, after fluid challenge, FC, administration) can be detected in 35-50% of both critically ill and surgical patients. The FC consists in assessing the hemodynamic effects of giving a small amount of fluid in a short period of time. The FC allows restoring fluid depletion when indicated, while minimizing the risk of overloading, which makes it the gold standard for assessing fluid depletion in patients undergoing surgery.
Then, FC administration should be based on predictors of fluid responsiveness. Static indexes, such as the central venous pressure, do not seem appropriate, whereas dynamic indexes, such as pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV), reliably predict the effect of FC administration during controlled mechanical ventilation only in case of a tidal volume (VT) of at least 8 mL/kg, which unfortunately are rarely found in both critically ill and surgical patients.
To overcome this VT-related limitation of PPV and SVV, the prediction of fluid responsiveness can be also achieved by applying functional hemodynamic tests aiming at increasing venous return and enhancing right ventricle preload dependence.
For example, when a FC is performed using a rapid infusion rate and a relatively "small" dose, its effect is sufficient to test whether the patient is on the ascending part of the cardiac function curve, hence showing an increase in cardiac output (CO).
The role of this small-dose (the so called mini-FC) has been recently tested to assess if the infusion of a small amount of fluids (100 ml in 1 minute) could predict the final effect of the residual aliquot (i.e., 250 ml of FC test subdivided as follows: 100 ml in 1 minute and 150 ml in 9 minutes). Both the sudden increase in the stroke volume and the reduction of PPV and SVV after a bolus of 100 ml of crystalloids administered in 1 minute showed high sensitivity and specificity in predicting the final outcome of the FC. However, the mini-FC has been tested, insofar, only in small-sized studies, needing further investigations to be confirmed.
Moreover, the response to the FC is transitory, and as such also its clinical effect. The study of Aya et al. pointed out that the effect of the FC is dissipated in about 10 minutes in both responders and non-responders and that a dose of 4 ml/kg of crystalloids is the lowest one to evocate a significant hemodynamic effect. It remains unclear, however, what the best approach to FC administration should be and, in fact, wide variability exists at this regard among studies performed both in the perioperative setting and in the intensive care unit (ICU). In fact, the rate of fluid administration is not fixed. A recent systematic review showed a significant heterogeneity. In a subgroup of 35 studies three (8.6%) reported an infusion rate of 1 ml/kg/min. In another group of 32 studies, the FC was administered in 30 minutes in 7 (21.8%) studies, in 20 minutes in 2 (6.2%) studies, in 13 minutes in 1 (3.1%) study, in 10 minutes in 15 studies (46.8%), in 5 minutes in 4 (12.5%) studies, in 3 minutes in 1 (3.1%) study, and in 2 minutes in 2 (6.2%) studies. The median (IQR) time of infusion was 10 (5-20) minutes.
After the indication of Aya et al., 4 ml/kg of crystalloids is the standard dose for the FC in our center. However, it is unclear if the rate of administration could affect the rate of fluid responsiveness. We, therefore, will perform a study to address this issue in a sample of neurosurgical patients.
The primary aim of the present study is assess whether the does the rate of infusion of fluid challenge affect fluid responsiveness in neurosurgical patients.
The secondary aim is to assess the reliability of the changes in SV, PPV and SVV after a mini-FC test in predicting the final fluid responsiveness.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment
All the enrolled patients will receive the same mini-fluid challenge test of 100ml and then will complete the 4 ml/kg fluid challenge in either 10 or 20 minutes
fluid challenge
4 ml/kg fluid challenge infused over in either 10 or 20 minutes
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
fluid challenge
4 ml/kg fluid challenge infused over in either 10 or 20 minutes
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Scheduled for elective supine neurosurgery and requiring invasive arterial monitoring;
3. Glasgow coma scale 15 at recruitment
Exclusion Criteria
2. Reduced left (ejection fraction \<30%) or right (systolic peak velocity of tricuspid annular motion \<0.17 m/s) ventricular systolic function;
3. Intra-operative use of vasopressors or inotropes before FC administration or between the first and the second bolus of fluids.
4. Chronic use beta-blocking agents.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Humanitas Clinical and Research Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Antonio Messina
ICU senior consultant
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Humanitas Research Hospital
Rozzano, Milano, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mahjoub Y, Lejeune V, Muller L, Perbet S, Zieleskiewicz L, Bart F, Veber B, Paugam-Burtz C, Jaber S, Ayham A, Zogheib E, Lasocki S, Vieillard-Baron A, Quintard H, Joannes-Boyau O, Plantefeve G, Montravers P, Duperret S, Lakhdari M, Ammenouche N, Lorne E, Slama M, Dupont H. Evaluation of pulse pressure variation validity criteria in critically ill patients: a prospective observational multicentre point-prevalence study. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Apr;112(4):681-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet442. Epub 2013 Dec 29.
Biais M, de Courson H, Lanchon R, Pereira B, Bardonneau G, Griton M, Sesay M, Nouette-Gaulain K. Mini-fluid Challenge of 100 ml of Crystalloid Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in the Operating Room. Anesthesiology. 2017 Sep;127(3):450-456. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001753.
Muller L, Toumi M, Bousquet PJ, Riu-Poulenc B, Louart G, Candela D, Zoric L, Suehs C, de La Coussaye JE, Molinari N, Lefrant JY; AzuRea Group. An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study. Anesthesiology. 2011 Sep;115(3):541-7. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318229a500.
Aya HD, Ster IC, Fletcher N, Grounds RM, Rhodes A, Cecconi M. Pharmacodynamic Analysis of a Fluid Challenge. Crit Care Med. 2016 May;44(5):880-91. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001517.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REFILL
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.