Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
30 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-05-06
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Reduction Ratio and Clearance During Hemodialysis With MCO-filter Compared to HDF With Standard High-flux Filter
NCT03437538
Reduction of Microemboli of Air Using a New Developed Air Trap (EmbolessTM) During Haemodialysis
NCT06168539
12 Weeks of Hemodialysis With Medium Cut-Off Filter Compared to Hemodiafiltration With Standard High-flux Filter.
NCT03416192
Sodium Chloride and Protein-Bound Toxin Removal in Hemodiafiltration
NCT01923961
The Benefit of Оn-Line High Convection Volume Hemodiafiltration Treatment Versus High Flow Dialysis on Reduction of Oxidative Stress and Health Related Quality of Life in Dialysis Patients
NCT02673099
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Purpose and Objective
The aim is to study:
* How much fluid is drawn from the interstitial space during dialysis, depending on whether fluid removal is needed or not.
* The size and rate of fluid reinfusion during ongoing dialysis.
* The composition of the recruited fluid from the interstitium, i.e., the proportion consisting of lymph/lymph reflow and the proportion recruited across capillary membranes/venulae from the pericapillary space.
Hypotheses The null hypothesis is that no detectable difference in fluid flows or source of fluid recruitment is found, between patients where a large volume is dialyzed and those patients who do not have significant fluid removal during dialysis.
The alternative hypothesis is that a clinical relevant difference in fluid flows from the interstitium and the pathway for fluid recruitment to the bloodstream is detected.
Outcome Measures
Primary outcome variables are:
Recruitment of fluid from the interstitium calculated from fluid removal and hemoglobin changes. Proportion of recruited fluid via lymph or via capillary/venulae walls based on fluid recruitment and changes in plasma albumin and immunoglobulins G and M.
Secondary outcome variables are:
Weight, blood pressure impact, and changes in bioimpedance variables.
Study Design:
Open-label, prospective clinical observational study, where patients are divided into two groups. One group with an intact urine production, and dialysis is performed solely to "cleanse" the blood and second group with little or no urine production, which requires significant fluid removal, in addition to blood purification, .
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
<500 ml Ultrafiltration
Patients undergoing hemodialysis with less than 500 ml ultrafiltration
Ultrafiltration
Patients are selected depending on need of ultrafiltration
>2000 ml Ultrafiltration
Patients undergoing hemodialysis with than 2000 ml ultrafiltration
Ultrafiltration
Patients are selected depending on need of ultrafiltration
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ultrafiltration
Patients are selected depending on need of ultrafiltration
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who drink large amounts of water during regular dialysis (\> 2 glasses, approximately 0.5 L).
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Region Östergötland
OTHER
Joachim Zdolsek
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Joachim Zdolsek
Associate professor, Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jonathan Bodare, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Region Oestergoetland
Erik Golsäter, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Region Oestergoetland
Fredrik Sundelin, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Region Oestergoetland
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Vrinnevi Hospital
Norrköping, Östergötland County, Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Zdolsek JH, Zdolsek M, Hahn RG. Recruitment of efferent lymph during infusion of 20 % albumin. Microvasc Res. 2023 Jul;148:104539. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2023.104539. Epub 2023 May 6.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MVVH
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.