Retun-to-school Adaptation Program for Children With Cancer
NCT ID: NCT06389357
Last Updated: 2025-09-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-05-30
2024-12-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Stage 1: Conduct an in-depth investigation into the adaptation challenges faced by children aged 8-17 who are being treated for cancer during their return to school, from both the children's and parents' perspectives;
Stage 2: Develop a structured, evidence-based, and digitally accessible intervention program that addresses these identified needs;
Stage 3: Evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the intervention; and
Ultimately, based on all data gathered throughout the implementation process, continuously refine the intervention and analyze participant feedback holistically in order to establish a sustainable support model.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Motivation Program for Children With Cancer
NCT05982379
Digital Storytelling in Symptom Management Pediatric Oncology
NCT06436651
The Effect of Technology-Based Cognitive and Artistic Therapeutic Activities on the Mental Status of Children With Cancer
NCT05807308
The Effect of Community-Provided Psychosocial Support Videos on Disease Attitudes and Symptoms
NCT06011278
Evaluation of the Impact of a Family-Centered Empowerment Program on Self-Efficacy, Self-Esteem, Depression, Anxiety, Stress Level, and Care Skills in Parents of Children With Oncological Problems
NCT05181228
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Place of application:
It will be performed in the paediatric leukaemia outpatient clinic of the Children's Hospital.
Study Population The population of the study consisted of children who were followed up in the paediatric leukaemia outpatient clinic of the Children's Hospital with a diagnosis of cancer.
Sample of the study In Phase 1, it was observed that after a certain number of interviews, no new themes or concepts emerged, and the data began to repeat previously obtained information. Accordingly, it was concluded that data saturation had been reached, and the data collection process was terminated. The sample for Phase 1 consisted of 12 children and their parents (n = 12).
In Phase 3, the study was conducted using a pre-experimental research design with a single group consisting only of the intervention group during the school re-entry adaptation program.
In program evaluation studies, a medium effect size is generally considered sufficient for quantitative evaluation methods. Accordingly, an effect size (Cohen's f) of at least 0.25 is recommended (Crisan \& Elliott, 2018). For sample size planning, our study determined the estimated sample size to be 24 participants, based on 80% power and a 5% margin of error. The program in phase-3 was completed with 20 children and their parents who agreed to participate in the program.
Data Collection Tools
Phase 1: Identifying the experiences of children diagnosed with cancer and their parents during the return-to-school process - Descriptive phenomenological study:
The Child and Parent Descriptive Information Form Semi-Structured Interview Form
Phase 3: Implementation and evaluation of the school re-entry adaptation program:
1. Child and Parent Descriptive Information Form
2. Data Collection Form for Children's Return to School Process
3. Social Anxiety Scale for Children-Revised Version
4. Social Anxiety Scale for Adolescents
5. Paediatric Cancer Coping Scale
6. Readiness to Return to School Scale for Children with Oncological Problems: 7-18 Age
7. Process Evaluation Forms
Statistical analysis
Phase 1 - Qualitative Study:
The audio recordings of the interviews were transcribed. The qualitative data were analyzed using thematic content analysis via MAXQDA 2024 software. The steps of thematic analysis-transcription of the data, creation of codes, identification of themes, and reporting-were systematically followed to develop the context, main themes, and sub-themes. Codes were identified and grouped, which informed the final sub-theme and theme structure.
Sociodemographic characteristics collected during the qualitative phase were analyzed using SPSS version 30.0.0.0 and reported using frequencies and percentages.
Phase 3 - Implementation and Evaluation of the Program:
To assess the adaptation program, the normality of children's scale scores was evaluated using Shapiro-Wilk tests and skewness-kurtosis values. For variables that did not show a normal distribution, median values were reported (see Table 3.14).
The statistical significance of changes in scale scores over time within the sample group was examined using the Friedman test. A significance level of p ≤ 0.05 was accepted for all statistical tests. In cases where a statistically significant difference was found, Bonferroni-adjusted Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Tests were conducted to determine between which measurements the differences occurred, with a significance threshold set at p ≤ 0.01.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Implementation and evaluation of the school re-entry adaptation program
Counselling interviews and workshops will be held simultaneously with the children receiving the web-based training. There are 4 modules in total. The first module lasts 2 weeks. The counselling interview will start in the 2nd week. Implementation will be completed in 5 weeks.
training and counselling
It includes 4 modules that develop children's communication, coping and social life skills and psychosocial preparation for the return to school process. The modules include theoretical explanations, stories, workshops and counselling sessions. Separate educational modules have been developed for parents, teachers, and peers.
Interview
As part of the needs assessment in Phase 1, individual interviews with children with cancer and their parents lasting approximately 20-30 minutes were conducted.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
training and counselling
It includes 4 modules that develop children's communication, coping and social life skills and psychosocial preparation for the return to school process. The modules include theoretical explanations, stories, workshops and counselling sessions. Separate educational modules have been developed for parents, teachers, and peers.
Interview
As part of the needs assessment in Phase 1, individual interviews with children with cancer and their parents lasting approximately 20-30 minutes were conducted.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Aged between 8 and 17 years Diagnosed with cancer (leukemia, lymphoma, or solid tumor) For children diagnosed with leukemia, currently receiving or having completed maintenance therapy For children diagnosed with other cancer types, treatment has been completed or they are continuing outpatient treatment Have completed the treatment process but have not yet returned to school Have returned to school after treatment but discontinued again due to difficulties managing the adaptation process Have internet access Able to use the internet, computer, and phone Able to speak Turkish Consent to participate in the study
For Parents:
Own a computer or smartphone Have internet access Able to use the internet, computer, and phone Able to speak Turkish Consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
Requiring special physical and/or mental care Having learning disabilities Having a psychological or medical diagnosis (e.g., severe depression) Diagnosed with brain tumor Diagnosed with osteosarcoma Receiving immunosuppressive therapy Experiencing a major stressful event within the past year (e.g., loss, surgery unrelated to cancer treatment) Preparing to take secondary or higher education entrance exams during the study period
For Parents:
Requiring special physical and/or mental care Having learning disabilities Having a psychological or medical diagnosis (e.g., severe depression)
8 Years
17 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Gazi University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gizem Çakır
Research Assistant, RN, PhD(c)
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gizem Cakir, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Gazi University Nursing Faculty
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Gizem Cakir
Ankara, Cankaya, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Crisan A, Elliott M. How to evaluate an evaluation study? Comparing and contrasting practices in vis with those of other disciplines. IEEE Xplore. 2018; doi: 10.1109/BELIV.2018.8634420.
Rabin C, Simpson N, Morrow K, Pinto B. Behavioral and psychosocial program needs of young adult cancer survivors. Qual Health Res. 2011 Jun;21(6):796-806. doi: 10.1177/1049732310380060. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
Ellis SJ, Wakefield CE, Antill G, Burns M, Patterson P. Supporting children facing a parent's cancer diagnosis: a systematic review of children's psychosocial needs and existing interventions. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Jan;26(1). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12432. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
Thompson AL, Christiansen HL, Elam M, Hoag J, Irwin MK, Pao M, Voll M, Noll RB, Kelly KP. Academic Continuity and School Reentry Support as a Standard of Care in Pediatric Oncology. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015 Dec;62 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S805-17. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25760.
Canter KS, Roberts MC. A systematic and quantitative review of interventions to facilitate school reentry for children with chronic health conditions. J Pediatr Psychol. 2012 Nov-Dec;37(10):1065-75. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jss071. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1305G2024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.