Improving Quality and Consistency in Family Education Prior to First Discharge Following Pediatric Cancer Diagnosis
NCT ID: NCT03752801
Last Updated: 2021-03-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
67 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-05-01
2019-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Improving Quality of Life of Children With Cancer Through Psychosocial Screening
NCT02788604
School Reintegration Outcomes in Pediatric Cancer Patients
NCT00477256
How Family Coping With Child Cancer Affects Child's Quality of Life?
NCT02470975
Psychological Benefits of a Normalized Camping Experience for Children With Cancer
NCT00001186
The Family Talk Intervention in Pediatric Oncology
NCT03650530
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods for providing parent/caregiver education currently include verbal discussion with HCPs and written information. Evaluation of educational video strategies in pediatric oncology has been limited to taped diagnostic discussions. It is reported that 90% of parents/caregivers of pediatric cancer patients search the internet for information. Video education developed by pediatric oncology experts has the advantage of providing consistent information, being available for repeat viewing, and available at times chosen by the parents/caregivers.
Goals and Objectives The overarching goal is to improve consistency and quality of education provided to parents/caregivers of newly diagnosed pediatric oncology patients.
Primary Objective:
To develop two short video-based education modules for parents/caregivers of children with newly diagnosed cancer which are acceptable and understandable.
Secondary Objectives:
1. To determine the feasibility of a trial of providing education in video modules as demonstrated by the ability to recruit 20 parents/caregivers of newly diagnosed children with cancer within 8 months and by having at least 90% of enrolled parents/caregivers watch the two videos and answer 10 knowledge and confidence questions
2. To obtain qualitative feedback about the videos
3. To describe change in knowledge and confidence before and after viewing the two videos
Impact and Relevance Statement This study is proposing a novel video-based education program for parents/caregivers which hypothesize will lead to improved understanding and confidence to care for their child newly diagnosed with cancer post first discharge from hospital. Learning in this fashion can be conducted at a time best suited to each individual caregiver and allow for repetition of the materials as often as desired. It ensures that different caregivers for the same child receive the same information. The greatest impact will be on the parents/caregivers with a goal to increase knowledge, preparedness and confidence and minimize distress and anxiety.
Methods:
In this pilot study the investigators plan to develop and evaluate two video modules focused on two essential 'prior-to-first-discharge' topics: the approach to fever and giving medications at home. The video modules will be short, concise and will include case-based scenarios allowing parents/caregivers to review and consolidate teaching.
The content of the videos will be developed by pediatric oncology nurses, physicians and pharmacists from across POGO centers. The review panel will consist of 8-12 HCPs with representation by discipline and center. The script will be developed in a series of teleconferences in which first the content will be developed and refined using a consensus approach. Once the content is agreed upon, a script will be developed and refined among the review panel. When finalized, the investigators will begin to test acceptability and understandability with respondents. For this phase, eligible respondents will be any parent or caregiver of a child with cancer irrespective of type or timing of diagnosis. The investigators will exclude respondents who do not understand English. The investigators will then test the script with consecutive parent/guardian respondents using one-on-one cognitive interviews. The investigators will ask the respondent to read the script and the investigators will ask them to rate acceptability and understandability on 5 Point Likert scales which the investigators have used previously for instrument development.
Using a semi-structured interview, the investigators will ask probing questions to clarify their understanding of content. A second interviewer will be present who will rate understandability on a 4 point Likert scale ranging from 1=completely incorrect to 4=completely correct. After every 5 interviews, the results will be shared with the review panel who will decide whether to modify the script. Iterations will continue until at least 4 of the last 5 respondents are correct in their interpretation, state the script is understandable and acceptable and further modifications are not required based upon qualitative comments.
The finalized scripts will be developed into short videos, less than 5 minutes in length. The videos will be tested in new groups of 5 respondents and similarly evaluated for acceptability and understandability using cognitive interviews. Respondents will be specifically asked about length and clarity of information presented.
The videos will be considered satisfactory when at least 4 of the last 5 respondents are correct in their interpretation, state the video is understandable and acceptable and further modifications are not required based upon qualitative comments.
Confidence and knowledge questions will be developed in a similar method with consensus among the Pediatric Oncology HCPs and then with parents. This will allow both clinical expert consensus and parent validation.
Next, the investigators will test the feasibility of a trial of the educational video modules by conduct of a pilot study based at SickKids. Eligible respondents will be parents or caregivers of children newly diagnosed with cancer within the past 4 weeks. The investigators will exclude parents who do not understand English. Only one parent per child will be eligible. For eligible and consenting parents/caregivers, the investigators will ask them to watch the two videos, summarize the content of the video and provide feedback similar to the development phase. The investigators will also ask them to answer the confidence survey and the knowledge questions which will measure their knowledge and confidence in different domains of fever management and medication administration. The questions will be administered before and after watching the videos.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Script Review Parents/Caregivers
will have script reviewed and evaluated by parents/caregivers in groups of 5 up to 40 participants until 4/5 parents/caregivers demonstrate that script is understandable and acceptable.
No interventions assigned to this group
Video Review Parents/Caregivers
review and evaluation of the developed educational videos by parents/caregivers up to 20 parents who have not participated in the script review
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* for the video review phase - must be a parent/caregiver of a child diagnosed with cancer in the last 8 months
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario
OTHER
The Hospital for Sick Children
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Denise Mills
Nurse Practitioner
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Denise Mills
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Hospital for Sick Children
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sickkids
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Landier W, Ahern J, Barakat LP, Bhatia S, Bingen KM, Bondurant PG, Cohn SL, Dobrozsi SK, Haugen M, Herring RA, Hooke MC, Martin M, Murphy K, Newman AR, Rodgers CC, Ruccione KS, Sullivan J, Weiss M, Withycombe J, Yasui L, Hockenberry M. Patient/Family Education for Newly Diagnosed Pediatric Oncology Patients. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2016 Nov/Dec;33(6):422-431. doi: 10.1177/1043454216655983. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
Haugen MS, Landier W, Mandrell BN, Sullivan J, Schwartz C, Skeens MA, Hockenberry M. Educating Families of Children Newly Diagnosed With Cancer. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2016 Nov/Dec;33(6):405-413. doi: 10.1177/1043454216652856. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
Rodgers CC, Laing CM, Herring RA, Tena N, Leonardelli A, Hockenberry M, Hendricks-Ferguson V. Understanding Effective Delivery of Patient and Family Education in Pediatric OncologyA Systematic Review From the Children's Oncology Group [Formula: see text]. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2016 Nov/Dec;33(6):432-446. doi: 10.1177/1043454216659449. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
Rodgers CC, Stegenga K, Withycombe JS, Sachse K, Kelly KP. Processing Information After a Child's Cancer Diagnosis-How Parents Learn. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2016 Nov/Dec;33(6):447-459. doi: 10.1177/1043454216668825.
Weiss ME, Costa LL, Yakusheva O, Bobay KL. Validation of patient and nurse short forms of the Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale and their relationship to return to the hospital. Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb;49(1):304-17. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12092. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
O'Sullivan C, Dupuis LL, Gibson P, Johnston DL, Baggott C, Portwine C, Spiegler B, Kuczynski S, Tomlinson D, de Mol Van Otterloo S, Tomlinson GA, Sung L. Refinement of the symptom screening in pediatrics tool (SSPedi). Br J Cancer. 2014 Sep 23;111(7):1262-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.445. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REB1000060860
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.