Motivation Program for Children With Cancer

NCT ID: NCT05982379

Last Updated: 2023-08-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

31 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-09-02

Study Completion Date

2020-08-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of the technology-based motivation program implemented with children with cancer diagnosis and their primary caregivers.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial was completed with 31 children and 31 primary caregivers between the ages of 9 and18, who were being treated for cancer. A 10-week "Technology Based Motivation Program" was given to the intervention group. "State/ Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children", "Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory", "Paediatric Cancer Coping Scale", "State and Trait Anxiety Inventory," and "Process Evaluation Forms" were administered. Chi-square test, Fisher-Exact test, Independent Sample-t test, Man-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon test, Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients were used for data analysis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Design The study was conducted in two hospitals at Leukemia Polyclinic, Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Polyclinic, and Paediatric Haematology-Oncology Service from September 2019 to August 2020.

Setting and Samples In determining the research population, hospital registry information was used, and 119 children followed up with a diagnosis of cancer formed the research population. The sample of the research consisted of 44 children (leukaemia n = 33, solid tumour n = 11) and their primary caregivers meeting the inclusion criteria.

Randomization and blinding A stratified randomization method was used in the research. 44 children (leukaemia and solid tumour) who met the inclusion criteria were grouped according to gender (male and female) and age (9-13 years-14-18 years) and eight layers were obtained. Among the identified strata, intervention and control groups were randomized by an independent statistician using the website www.randomizer.org, 22 children were assigned to the intervention, and 22 to the control group. Five children from the intervention group and five children from the control group (unreachable (n=3), ex (n=1), refusal (n=4), Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) performed (n=1), intensive care unit admission (n=1)) could not be included in the research for various reasons and 34 children were included in the research. The purpose and content of the research were explained without informing the children and their primary caregivers that they were in the intervention or control group.

At the end of the research, the power analysis performed by using the mean scores of State Anxiety Inventory for Children with G \* Power 3.0.10 program yielded a total of at least 28 samples that were found to be sufficient with 90% power and 5% margin of error (n1 = 14; n2 = 14).

Theoretical underpinnings The use of models is important in establishing the theoretical framework of research. In this research, the Transactional Stress and Coping Model of Lazarus and Folkman, which is the most widely used model in studies examining the coping and anxiety levels of children with cancer diagnosis, was used. The practices in the motivation program were created for the coping strategies of "seeking social support, self-control, positive evaluation and accepting responsibility" in the model.

Interventions The research consists of four stages. (1) Constructing training modules, (2) Creating a website, (3) Conducting preliminary intervention, and (4) Implementing the training modules with the children and primary caregivers in the intervention group.

Constructing training modules Four training modules for children and three training modules for primary caregivers were created by the researchers in line with the literature Content was added to the website after it was approved by 6 experts.

Creating the website The website was designed by a professional web design firm. The website can be accessed by computer, tablet and phone. There is an administrator and user panel on the website. Children and primary caregivers logged on the website with different passwords through the user panel and accessed the modules specially prepared for them.

Conducting preliminary intervention The preliminary intervention of the technology-based program was conducted with five children aged 9-18 years who were followed up with a diagnosis of leukaemia, and with their primary caregivers. As the child and primary caregivers found the program applicable as a result of the preliminary intervention, no change was made and it was included in the sample.

Using the training modules with children and primary caregivers in the intervention group The website and four training modules were used with the children in the intervention group. Nine coaching interviews with each child (once a week) were conducted over WhatsApp. The children were encouraged to do progressive relaxation and breathing exercises at least twice a week, and eight therapeutic stories (once a week) were sent to the child's phone in the form of animation.

Three training modules were used with the primary caregivers, and coaching interviews were conducted on WhatsApp twice during the program. Primary caregivers practiced progressive relaxation and breathing exercises at least twice a week. In addition, eight motivation messages were sent to the child and primary caregiver, and 24/7 consultancy was provided.

Control Group The routine practices of the children in the control group and their primary caregivers at the hospital continued. In addition, forms other than process evaluation were given to the child and their primary caregivers at the beginning and end of the program.

Data gathering After the children and primary caregivers who participated in the research were informed about the research in an empty room or in the room where they were treated during the polyclinic controls, data collection forms were given, the children and primary caregivers in the intervention group were subscribed to the website, and the exercises were explained in practice. It took approximately 60 minutes for the participants to fill out the forms and learn about the program. At the end of the research, the data collection forms (excluding the descriptive data form) were collected through WhatsApp messages.

Data collection tools Child and Parent Descriptive Characteristics Form, Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, State/ Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children, Paediatric Cancer Coping Scale, Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory, and Process Evaluation Forms were used to collect the data.

Ethical considerations Permission for the research was obtained from the University Ethics Committee and Hospitals. Informed written consent was obtained from the children and their primary caregivers, who agreed to participate in the research, after written and verbal explanations were given to the patients to participate in the research. At the end of the study, all interventions were also performed with the control group.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Childhood Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A randomized controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Among the identified strata, intervention and control groups were randomized by an independent statistician using the website www.randomizer.org. The data of the study were entered by a person other than the researcher. Statistical analysis was performed by a person other than the researcher.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention

This study was carried out with two groups. Technology Based Motivation Program were used for the intervention group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Technology Based Motivation Program

Intervention Type OTHER

A 10-week "Technology Based Motivation Program" was given to the intervention group. The website and four training modules were used with the children in the intervention group. Nine coaching interviews with each child (once a week) were conducted over WhatsApp. The children were encouraged to do progressive relaxation and breathing exercises at least twice a week, and eight therapeutic stories (once a week) were sent to the child's phone in the form of animation.

Three training modules were used with the primary caregivers, and coaching interviews were conducted on WhatsApp twice during the program. Primary caregivers practiced progressive relaxation and breathing exercises at least twice a week. In addition, eight motivation messages were sent to the child and primary caregiver, and 24/7 consultancy was provided.

Control

No application was made to the control group, standard procedure was followed.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Technology Based Motivation Program

A 10-week "Technology Based Motivation Program" was given to the intervention group. The website and four training modules were used with the children in the intervention group. Nine coaching interviews with each child (once a week) were conducted over WhatsApp. The children were encouraged to do progressive relaxation and breathing exercises at least twice a week, and eight therapeutic stories (once a week) were sent to the child's phone in the form of animation.

Three training modules were used with the primary caregivers, and coaching interviews were conducted on WhatsApp twice during the program. Primary caregivers practiced progressive relaxation and breathing exercises at least twice a week. In addition, eight motivation messages were sent to the child and primary caregiver, and 24/7 consultancy was provided.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

For children:

* Those having received cancer treatment (leukaemia, lymphomas and solid tumours),
* Those aged 9-18 years,
* Those who speak Turkish,
* Those who have internet access on their smart phone or computer,
* Self and primary caregiver having agreed to participate in the study, and
* Those who can continue the research for 9 weeks (Trying progressive relaxation exercises, breathing exercises and imagination at least twice a week).

For primary caregivers:

* Those who speak Turkish,
* Those who are literate,
* Those who have internet access on their smart phones and computers,
* Those who agree to participate in the research, and
* Those who can continue the research for 9 weeks (Trying progressive relaxation exercises at least twice a week).

Exclusion Criteria

* Those who do not agree to participate in the research,
* Those who have experienced significant life events in the last 6 months (migration, death, divorce etc.),
* The presence of another important disease in the family that can increase stress and prevent coping, and
* Those who do not have internet access.
Minimum Eligible Age

9 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zeynep Kisecik Şengül

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zeynep Kisecik Şengül

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zeynep Kisecik Şengül, RN, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kırıkkale University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Zeynep Kisecik Şengül

Kırıkkale, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ZSengul-experimental study

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.