Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device RemOval Versus Full CoUrse Medical Treatment
NCT ID: NCT06323668
Last Updated: 2024-11-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
180 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-05-17
2038-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The hypothesis is that CIED removal + guideline antibiotic therapy is better than 6-weeks antibiotic therapy alone in preventing death or relapse of bacteremia in patients with bacteremia and possible CIED infection (not definite CIED infection).
The objective of this study is to test whether CIED removal + guideline antibiotic therapy is superior to 6-weeks antibiotic therapy alone in prevention of the composite endpoint of death or relapse bacteremia after 6 months of follow-up in patients with CIED and systemic infection but without definite CIED infection.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Lifelong Antibiotic thErapy vs Stop and See
NCT05958290
New Treatment of Cardiac Device Infections; Immediate Reimplantation After Removal of Infected System
NCT06250985
Remote Alert Pathway To Optimize CaRe of Cardiac Implantable Electrical Devices
NCT06937658
Impact of Partial Capsule Decortication on Device-related Infection in Patients Receiving Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Replacement
NCT05390216
TYRX™ Envelope for Prevention of Infection Following Replacement With a CRT or ICD
NCT01043705
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The hypothesis is that CIED removal + guideline antibiotic therapy is superior to 6-weeks antibiotic therapy alone in preventing death or relapse of bacteremia in patients with bacteremia and possible CIED infection (not definite CIED infection). The investigators want to test whether CIED removal + guideline antibiotic therapy is superior to 6-weeks antibiotic therapy in prevention of the composite endpoint of death or relapse bacteremia after 6 months of follow-up in patients with CIED and systemic infection but without definite CIED infection.
The study is a randomized open label trial. Patients will be allocated by 1:1 randomization to CIED extraction + guideline antibiotic therapy or 6-weeks antibiotic therapy alone. The primary outcome is a composite endpoint of death or relapse bacteremia (same microorganism) within 6 months after randomization. The secondary outcomes are days alive and out-of-hospital to 6 months, death, readmission for any cause, device extraction, relapse of bacteremia (the same microorganism), relapse of bacteremia (all species), and definite CIED infection.
All patients suspected of CIED infection or patients with bacteremia + CIED will be screened for inclusion in the CIEDOUT study according to the ESC modified diagnosis criteria. To enable timely identification of possible candidates, a surveillance system will be set up combining data from The Danish Pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) registry and then real-time bacteremia surveillance data through The Danish nationwide clinical Microbiology Database (MiBa). Hence, whenever a relevant bacteremia is identified, the CIED registry will then by queried for whether that patient also has CIED. Randomization allocation ratio is 1:1 through a computerized application via RedCap. Patients will be entered into the "intention to treat" analysis.
The patients will be randomized to CIED removal and/or medical therapy (at least 10 days iv antibiotic therapy and then per oral treatment to 6 weeks total by POET criteria). The CIED removal will be done as soon as possible within 7 days. The study-outcomes will be assessed at three routine clinical check-ups as part of the standard treatment at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 3 months after randomization. Within 6 months after randomization, patients will be followed for outcomes through medical charts and the national health registries. After that, the patients will be assessed for outcomes on an annual basis by medical chart review and the Danish nationwide registries.
The total trial duration is expected to be 14 years. Inclusion period for the main paper is expected to be 4 years and then follow-up for 3 months for the last included patients. Hereafter, patients will be followed for outcomes annually through medical charts and the national health registries up to 10 years after the last included patient until 2038.
Based on prior studies and especially preliminary data, it is estimated that approximately 29% of patients will experience a primary event by 6 months in the medical treatment group and 12% in the extraction group. In order to have 80% power to detect difference in total primary endpoints between the treatment groups, at least 174 patients will be needed (87 in each study arm) over a median follow-up of 3 years to be able to reject the null hypothesis with a power of 80% and a risk of type I error of 5. Assuming a steady rate of patients with the inclusion criteria, there will be approximately 100 incident cases available for the CIEDOUT study annually in Eastern Denmark based on preliminary data. If 60% of these consent to the study, 60 incident patients per year will be included. By 3 years, 180 incident patients will then be included.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cardiac implantable electronic device removal + empirical antibiotic therapy
CIED removal + guideline antibiotic therapy (at least 10 days iv antibiotic therapy and then per oral treatment to 6 weeks total by POET criteria).
The antibiotic therapy is targeted according to microbiological analyses per microorganism.
The CIED removal will be done as soon as possible within 7 days.
Cardiac implantable electronic device extraction
The CIED removal will be done as soon as possible within 7 days.
Empirical antibiotic therapy
Guideline antibiotic therapy (at least 10 days iv antibiotic therapy and then per oral treatment to 6 weeks total by POET criteria). The antibiotic therapy is targeted according to microbiological analyses per microorganism.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cardiac implantable electronic device extraction
The CIED removal will be done as soon as possible within 7 days.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
AND
Bacteremia/fungemia with S. aureus detected in ≥1 positive blood culture(s) or CoNS, Cutibacterium spp., Candida spp, Streptococcus spp. (except Streptococcus pneumoniae), and Enterococcus faecalis detected in ≥2 positive blood cultures.
OR
Left-sided valve infective endocarditis
AND
Possible CIED infection\*
AND
Bacteremia/fungemia detected in ≥1 positive blood culture(s) with S. aureus, CoNS, Cutibacterium spp., Candida spp., Streptococcus spp. (except Streptococcus pneumoniae), and Enterococcus faecalis
Exclusion Criteria
* Unwilling to sign informed consent
* Unable to sign informed consent
OR
At least one of the following criteria
* Not a candidate by clinician discretion
* Definite CIED infection\*
* Clinical frailty score ≥7
* EUROSCORE II \>33%
* Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) \<1L or \<30% of expected
* By the modified Duke and ESC diagnostic criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Emil Loldrup Fosbol
Professor, MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Emil L Fosbøl, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H-23067693
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.