Impact on Patient Outcome of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Complications
NCT ID: NCT03612635
Last Updated: 2018-08-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
2811 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2010-01-01
2017-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Multi-centre Observational Registry on Patients With Implantable Devices Remotely Monitored
NCT03061747
Actions Elicited by In-hospital Follow-up of Cardiac Devices
NCT01073449
DEtect Long-term Complications After icD rEplacement: a Multicenter Italian Registry
NCT02076789
Clinical Efficacy of Remote Monitoring in the Management of Heart Failure
NCT01723865
Evaluation of an Organizational Model for Remote Monitoring of Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Recipients
NCT01459874
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Implantation of a cardiac implantable electronic device
All patients enrolled in the registry underwent cardiac implantable electronic device implantation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Azienda Ospedaliera Cardinale G. Panico
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
"Card. G. Panico" Hospital
Tricase, Lecce, Italy
Federico Guerra
Ancona, , Italy
Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi
Bologna, , Italy
Mattia Laffi
Genova, , Italy
Monaldi Hospital
Napoli, , Italy
AOU "Maggiore della Carità "
Novara, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Palmisano P, Sergi C, Panico V, Chiarillo MV, Chiuri MD, Martella ML, Stefanelli G, Martella D, Mauro R, Ponzetta MA, Parlavecchio A, Accogli M, Coluccia G. Impact on nurse workload and patient satisfaction of atrioventricular junction ablation performed simultaneously with conduction system pacing using a superior approach from the pocket compared with the conventional femoral approach. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2024 Oct 21;23(7):746-755. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvae043.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
POINTED
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.