TYRX™ Envelope for Prevention of Infection Following Replacement With a CRT or ICD

NCT ID: NCT01043705

Last Updated: 2015-12-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1262 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection and CIED mechanical complication after CIED replacement with a high-power cardiac implantable electronic device; either a cardiac resynchronization therapy device (CRT), or an implantable cardioverter defibrilator (ICD) and TYRX Anti-Bacterial Envelope (formerly known as "AIGISRx"), to the incidence, after replacement with an ICD or CRT and no TYRX.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection is associated with significant morbidity and expense. The frequency of CIED infection is increasing faster than the frequency of CIED implants, suggesting more effective prophylactic strategies are needed.

The TYRX Anti-Bacterial Envelope is an FDA-cleared polypropylene mesh that is intended to securely hold a pacemaker pulse generator or defibrillator (ICD) in order to create a stable environment when implanted in the body. It contains the antimicrobial agents, rifampin and minocycline, which have been shown to reduce infection in an in vivo model of bacterial contamination following surgical implant of the generator or defibrillator.

This is a prospective, observational, multicenter registry of subjects undergoing CIED replacement with an ICD or CRT and TYRX, with or without lead revision/addition. The registry subjects will be compared to a published historical control group undergoing CIED replacement with an ICD or CRT and no TYRX , with or without lead revision/addition. The CRT registry subjects will also be compared to a case-matched retrospective control group undergoing CIED replacement with a CRT and no TYRX , with or without lead revision/addition. The primary study endpoints are major CIED infection and CIED mechanical complication during the 12 months following CIED replacement with an ICD or CRT.

Originally executed as two separate studies (Citadel - ICDs) and (Centurion - CRTs), a protocol amendment was executed in 2012 due to slow enrollment, combining the databases for analysis of results.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Pacemaker infection Defibrillator infection ICD infection CRT infection Cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection Infection Pacemaker, Artificial Defibrillators

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CIED replacement with CRT and TYRX

(Prospective Arm) Patients who have undergone CIED replacement with a CRT and the TYRX Anti-bacterial envelope, with or without lead revision.

No interventions assigned to this group

CIED replacement with ICD and TYRX

(Prospective Arm) Patients who have undergone CIED replacement with an ICD and the TYRX Anti-bacterial envelope, with or without lead revision.

No interventions assigned to this group

CIED replacement with ICD or CRT and TYRX

(Prospective Arm) Patients who have undergone CIED replacement with an ICD or CRT and the TYRX Anti-bacterial envelope, with or without lead revision.

No interventions assigned to this group

CIED replacement w/ CRT & no TYRX

(Retrospective Case-Control Arm) Patients who have undergone CIED replacement with a CRT and no TYRX Anti-bacterial envelope, with or without lead revision/addition.

No interventions assigned to this group

CIED replacement w/ CRT & TYRX vs. Case Match Arm

Patients who have undergone CIED replacement with a CRT and TYRX Anti-bacterial envelope, with or without lead revision/addition. Cohort is TYRX Case, Matched to Retrospective Case-Control Arm)

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Qualifying CIED Implant procedure was replacement with an ICD or CRT and TYRX, with or without lead revision/addition
* Received a complete TYRX Anti-Bacterial Envelope Model# 3122 or #3133 according to the Instructions for Use (IFU)
* Clinically stable to tolerate procedure
* 18 years or older
* Able to return for follow-up care through the 12-month visit, or able to have referring physician provide follow-up data to study site by telephone


* Qualifying CIED Implant was replacement with a CRT and TYRX, with or without lead revision/addition
* First un-enrolled patient meeting case-matching criteria in series of patients implanted with a CIED and no TYRX beginning 24 months prior to the date of first TYRX implant at site. If no matching patients in this period, first un-enrolled matching patient implanted with a CIED and no TYRX beginning 24 months prior to the first TYRX implant at site, searching in reverse chronological order
* Had at least one of following by date of enrollment into the study:

1. ≥ 12 months follow-up after Qualifying TYRX Implant
2. Subsequent TYRX Procedure that required opening the generator pocket or implant incision ≤ 12 months after Qualifying TYRX Implant (e.g. battery change, upgrade, lead revision, explant)
3. Death ≤ 12 months after Qualifying CIED Implant
* Survived Qualifying CIED Implant to discharge, died of a CIED infection or Mechanical Complication prior to hospital discharge, or died for any reason un-related to Qualifying CIED Implant prior to hospital discharge
* 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable/unwilling to provide informed consent
* Contraindication to receiving the TYRX device, in accordance with the package labeling
* Pregnant or was at risk for becoming pregnant in the 30 day period following the Qualifying TYRX Implant
* Current CIED infection, or the indication for Qualifying CIED Implant was replacement of CIED that was explanted for infection
* Clinical diagnosis of an active infection at the time of CIED implant, including pneumonia, urinary tract infection, endovascular, cellulitis, bacteremia, or other major systemic infection. (Note: asymptomatic bacteremia without UTI is not an exclusion criterion)
* Generator replacement required planned lead extraction
* Participating in another clinical study evaluating a drug or device designed to reduce CIED infections
* Life expectancy of less than 6 months
* Expected to receive a heart transplant within 6 months
* With the exception of the elderly in good mental health, all vulnerable subjects as defined by the FDA Office of Human Research Protection or local IRB will be excluded


* Contraindication to receiving the TYRX device, in accordance with the package labeling
* Pregnant or became pregnant in the 30 day period following the Qualifying TYRX Implant.
* CIED infection, or the indication for Qualifying CIED Implant was replacement of CIED that was explanted for infection
* Clinical diagnosis of an active infection at the time of Qualifying CIED Implant, including pneumonia, urinary tract infection, endovascular, cellulitis, bacteremia, or other major systemic infection (Note: asymptomatic bacteriuria without UTI is not an exclusion criterion)
* Lead extraction was performed at the Qualifying CIED Implant
* Participated in another clinical study evaluating a drug or device intended to reduce CIED infections
* Received a heart transplant within 6 months of Qualifying CIED Implant
* With the exception of the elderly in good mental health, all vulnerable subjects as defined by the FDA Office of Human Research Protection or local IRB will be excluded
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

TYRX, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Princeton Medical Center

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Decatur General Hospital

Decatur, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Eliza Coffee Memorial Hospital

Florence, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Riverview Regional Hospital

Gadsden, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Arizona Heart Hospital

Scottsdate, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Community Memorial Hospital

Ventura, California, United States

Site Status

Watsonville Community Hospital

Watsonville, California, United States

Site Status

Citrus Memorial Hospital

Inverness, Florida, United States

Site Status

Osceola Regional Medical Center

Kissimmee, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of Miami

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando Regional Hospital

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tallahassee Memorial Hospital

Tallahassee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Piedmont Medical Center

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Emory University Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Veteran's Administration Medical Center

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Wellstar Kennestone Hospital

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Trinity Medical Center

Rock Island, Illinois, United States

Site Status

St. John's Hospital

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

St. Mary's Medical

Hobart, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Community Hospital, Munster

Munster, Indiana, United States

Site Status

St. Margaret Mercy

Munster, Indiana, United States

Site Status

P and S Surgical Hospital

Monroe, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

University of Maryland Medical Center

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Johns Hopkins University Hospital

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Penninsula Regional Medical Center

Salisbury, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Massachusetts Medical School

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Henry Ford Health System

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Sparrow Hospital

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

William Beaumont Hospital

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Gulfport Memorial Hospital

Biloxi, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Keesler Air Force Base Hospital

Biloxi, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Southern Heart Center

Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Alegent Health

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Englewood Hospital and Medical Center

Englewood, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

St. Francis Hospital

Hamilton, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Newark Beth Israel Hospital

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Valley Hospital

Ridgewood, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital

Sewell, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

St. Luke's - Roosevelt Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Frye Regional Medical Center

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Catholic Health Partners

Youngstown, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Doylestown Hospital

Doylestown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pinnacle Health Harrisburg Hospital

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

York Hospital

York, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Landmark Medical Center

Woonsocket, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Stern Cardiovascular Foundation

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

University of Tenn. Medical Center - Knoxville

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Texas Heart Institute - St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

NE Methodist

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Aurora Health Care

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sohail MR, Henrikson CA, Braid-Forbes MJ, Forbes KF, Lerner DJ. Comparison of mortality in women versus men with infections involving cardiovascular implantable electronic device. Am J Cardiol. 2013 Nov 1;112(9):1403-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.06.031. Epub 2013 Aug 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23972346 (View on PubMed)

Ballo P, Chiodi L, Zuppiroli A. Cardiac implantable electronic devices: prevention starts from ethics. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Apr 23;172(8):670-1; author reply 671-2. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.346. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22529239 (View on PubMed)

Henrikson CA, Sohail MR, Acosta H, Johnson EE, Rosenthal L, Pachulski R, Dan D, Paladino W, Khairallah FS, Gleed K, Hanna I, Cheng A, Lexcen DR, Simons GR. Antibacterial Envelope Is Associated With Low Infection Rates After Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Device Replacement: Results of the Citadel and Centurion Studies. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Oct;3(10):1158-1167. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 May 31.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29759500 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CP-2009-2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

NCT01043861

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: nct_alias