The COSP-RBD Study: Concussions and Contact Sports in RBD vs Controls
NCT ID: NCT06270290
Last Updated: 2024-05-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
140 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-04-23
2025-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* What is the proportion of patients with RBD that have a history of concussions or exposure to contact sports?
* Is this proportion higher to that in control patients without a diagnosis of RBD?
Participants will undergo an interview with a sleep medicine specialist to answer questions about history of concussions and contact sports practices.
Researchers will compare an RBD group and a control group (without RBD) to see if the proportion of concussions and exposure to contact sports differ.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
French Validation of a Severity Scale in REM Sleep Behavior Disorder (SEV-TCSP)
NCT04071899
Sleep After Adolescent Concussion
NCT03781076
A Naturalistic Study Investigating Sleep and Cognitive Learning in Children With and Without Tic Disorders
NCT02676492
Impact of Concussion History on Sleep and Physical Performance in Contact Sports Athletes
NCT06328023
Familial Aggregation and Biomarkers in REM Sleep Behaviour Disorder.
NCT03660982
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There is also solid evidence showing that repeated concussions lead to an increased risk to develop a neurodegenerative disorder such as Parkinson's disease, chronic traumatic encephalopathy, all-causes of dementia, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
In epidemiological studies, self-reported head injury was more frequently present in RBD vs controls. Head injury was also proposed as a possible risk factor for probable RBD in large community-based studies, although the diagnosis of RBD was not confirmed by v-PSG in these cases. Of note, a higher frequency of professional football players was demonstrated on a recent study including a large cohort of RBD patients when compared to a control group. Moreover, in a group of deceased contact sport athletes with neuropathology diagnosing traumatic chronic encephalopathy, probable RBD was present in over 30% of the sample.
We hypothesise that the presence of a history of concussions or exposure to contact sports is more frequently reported by patients with v-PSG-confirmed RBD than by sex- and age-matched controls. There is, however, a lack of further characterisation of the head-impact events and circumstances in which they have occurred. It would be relevant to know whether repeated head impacts while playing contact sports or concussions that may have not been formally diagnosed, and that may have happened in non-professional as well as in professional sport activities, may be linked with RBD. The demonstration of a higher percentage of concussions or exposure to contact sports in RBD would provide greater evidence related to neuropathological changes in the context of certain sport practices.
Given the prognostic implications of a diagnosis of RBD and the established links between head injury and neurodegenerative conditions, it seems relevant to assess the characteristics of previous concussions or exposure to head-impact sports in patients with v-PSG-confirmed RBD. This will provide further evidence to help increase the awareness of RBD (hopefully leading to a more timely diagnosis of this condition), and potentially aid the development of health and government policies, including those relating to safer sport practices.
As one of the major sleep disorders centres in the UK, and one of the few with expertise in sleep neurological conditions such as RBD, it is our responsibility to assess and report our experience on this matter.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the frequency of self-reported history of concussions or exposure to contact sports in patients with v-PSG-confirmed RBD against a control group (without a diagnosis of RBD).
Secondary objectives of this study will include investigating concussions/head impact characteristics in RBD vs control group. We will also aim to search differences in demographic and clinical variables between RBD patients with and without history of concussions/head impact.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
RBD group
Participants with a diagnosis of REM sleep behaviour disorder
Exposure to contact sports or history of concussions
History of contact sports practices or of concussions
Control group
Participants without a diagnosis of REM sleep behaviour disorder
Exposure to contact sports or history of concussions
History of contact sports practices or of concussions
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Exposure to contact sports or history of concussions
History of contact sports practices or of concussions
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 50 years of age or above (patients below this age would not be expected to have a RBD related to a synucleinopathy and other causes of RBD would need to be considered instead - e.g. narcolepsy, post-traumatic stress disorder).
* Patients who have undergone a v-PSG at the SDC (Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust) and who do not have history of suspected RBD or RBD confirmed by v-PSG.
* 50 years of age or above This group will be age- and sex-matched to the RBD group.
Exclusion Criteria
* Diagnoses of narcolepsy or post-traumatic stress disorder.
* Subjects lacking capacity or literacy.
* Non-English speakers.
* Age \< 50 years of age (in order to match RBD group).
* REM sleep without atonia or confirmed RBD on v-PSG.
* Diagnosis of neurological diseases, cognitive complaints or motor complaints.
* Clinical history suggestive of parasomnia that may be included in the differential of RBD.
* Subjects lacking capacity or literacy.
* Non-English speakers.
50 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gillian Radcliffe
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Guys and St. Thomas NHS Foundation Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
327648
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.