Pulmonary Ultrasound for the Assessment of Atelectasis in Anesthetized Children Using a Laryngeal Mask Airway.

NCT ID: NCT06214312

Last Updated: 2025-02-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

43 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-15

Study Completion Date

2024-06-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will use lung ultrasounds (LUS) to evaluate the incidence and severity of intraoperative atelectasis in anesthetized children undergoing minor surgery using a laryngeal mask airway. The children will be randomly assigned to be left in spontaneous ventilation with a Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) of 5cmH2O or to be ventilated with a pressure support mode.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

It is well known and described the deleterious effect that general anesthesia (GA) has on functional residual capacity (FRC), especially in children. This population is at higher risk of decreasing FRC during GA because of their lower capacity for elastic retraction and lower relaxation volume comparing to adults, predisposing them to the development of atelectasis and airway closure. These factors will lead to intrapulmonary shunts, which may impair the gas exchange and consequently oxygenation. By reducing the intrapulmonary shunt, Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) during controlled mechanical ventilation in patients with healthy lungs optimizes the FRC. However, the available data for an optimal ventilation strategy, including optimal PEEP, using a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in the pediatric population are scarce, even though this device is frequently used in all age groups for brief general anesthesia.

Diagnosing anesthesia-induced atelectasis in the perioperative period can be possible by using lung ultrasounds (LUS), a simple, easily accessible, non-invasive and radiation free technique, which might help determine the impact in pulmonary aeration between different ventilation strategies. In our study, we will focus on comparing spontaneous ventilation (VS) with a PEEP of 5 cmH2O and pressure-support ventilation using a LMA in anesthetized children undergoing minor and elective outpatient surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atelectasis Hypoxemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Spontaneous ventilation

Anesthetized Children ventilated with a laryngeal mask airway in spontaneous ventilation with a positive end expiratory pressure of 5cmH2O.

Lung Ultrasounds

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

An ultrasound exam of the lungs to identify possible areas of atelectasis.

Pressure support ventilation

Anesthetized Children ventilated with a laryngeal mask airway in pressure support ventilation with a positive end expiratory pressure of 5cmH2O, maximum pressure not exceeding 15cmH2O.

Lung Ultrasounds

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

An ultrasound exam of the lungs to identify possible areas of atelectasis.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lung Ultrasounds

An ultrasound exam of the lungs to identify possible areas of atelectasis.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* fasted children between 12 months and 8 years of age; American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score I or II without lung disease; baseline pulse oximetry in room air \>96%; scheduled for minor urological surgery (circumcision) under general anesthesia; written parent's agreement.

Exclusion Criteria

* ASA score \> II, chronic lung disease, airway infection in the last 15 days, impossibility of insertion of LMA.
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Maximum Eligible Age

8 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrea Carini, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Resident in Anesthesiology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chu St. Pierre

Brussels, Brussels Capital, Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Acosta CM, Maidana GA, Jacovitti D, Belaunzaran A, Cereceda S, Rae E, Molina A, Gonorazky S, Bohm SH, Tusman G. Accuracy of transthoracic lung ultrasound for diagnosing anesthesia-induced atelectasis in children. Anesthesiology. 2014 Jun;120(6):1370-9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000231.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24662376 (View on PubMed)

Acosta CM, Lopez Vargas MP, Oropel F, Valente L, Ricci L, Natal M, Suarez Sipmann F, Tusman G. Prevention of atelectasis by continuous positive airway pressure in anaesthetised children: A randomised controlled study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Jan;38(1):41-48. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001351.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33009190 (View on PubMed)

Fiedler MO, Schatzle E, Contzen M, Gernoth C, Weiss C, Walter T, Viergutz T, Kalenka A. Evaluation of Different Positive End-Expiratory Pressures Using Supreme Airway Laryngeal Mask during Minor Surgical Procedures in Children. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Oct 21;56(10):551. doi: 10.3390/medicina56100551.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33096743 (View on PubMed)

Joshi P, Vasishta A, Gupta M. Ultrasound of the pediatric chest. Br J Radiol. 2019 Aug;92(1100):20190058. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190058. Epub 2019 May 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31095416 (View on PubMed)

Templeton TW, Hoke LK, Yaung J, Aschenbrenner CA, Rose DM, Templeton LB, Bryan YF. Comparing 3 ventilation modalities by measuring several respiratory parameters using the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Nov;34:272-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.04.031. Epub 2016 May 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27687391 (View on PubMed)

Lim B, Pawar D, Ng O. Pressure support ventilation vs spontaneous ventilation via ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients undergoing ambulatory surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Apr;22(4):360-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03819.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22380745 (View on PubMed)

von Goedecke A, Brimacombe J, Keller C, Hoermann C, Loeckinger A, Rieder J, Kleinsasser A. Positive pressure versus pressure support ventilation at different levels of PEEP using the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2004 Dec;32(6):804-8. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0403200612.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15648991 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

B0762023231006

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.