Understanding and Intervening With State Shame and Self-criticism
NCT ID: NCT06200675
Last Updated: 2024-05-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
348 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-10-17
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
After a momentary shame induction, will a compassion-based intervention and a logic-based intervention both be more beneficial than a placebo control condition in terms of therapeutic outcomes?
Will the compassion-based intervention most effectively increase soothing affect, state self-compassion, and state self-reassurance?
Will the effects of these two interventions (1) differ as a function of the individual's trait self-criticism, and (2) will this be due to differing indirect effects of the intervention on safe/soothed feelings based on trait self-criticism?
Participants will first complete a set of baseline measures. Two to seven days later, they will be randomly assigned to one of three study conditions (i.e., compassion-based, logic-based, placebo control) after a brief shame induction. Participants will be asked to complete a set of questionnaires both before and after the shame induction as well as post-intervention.
This research will help us understand how best to intervene with the shame and self-criticism.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Exploring Efficacy of Multi-Mode Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) for PTSD
NCT07105345
Treatment for Veterans With Military Sexual Trauma
NCT00371644
The Role of Affect Regulation and Self-presentation in the Expressive Writing Intervention
NCT00831727
RESTORE Trial: A Pilot RCT of Enhanced Skills Training in Affective and Interpersonal Regulation (ESTAIR) for Veterans With CPTSD
NCT04752072
The Use of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
NCT02542709
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Compassion-based intervention
Participants assigned to this intervention will be asked to engage in one brief (10-15 minute) online compassion-focused exercise, where they will be asked to connect to their inner compassionate self. They will be asked to stay connected to that feeling while rereading what they wrote about their feelings of shame and imagining it was someone else who wrote it. Participants will then be asked to write a compassionate response to themselves. Participants will then be asked to reread this response while remaining connected to their compassionate self.
Compassion-based intervention
Participants assigned to this intervention will be asked to engage in one brief compassion-focused exercise, where they will be asked to be asked to connect to their inner compassionate self. They will be asked to stay connected to that feeling while rereading what they wrote about their feelings of shame and imagining it was someone else who wrote it. Participants will then be asked to write a compassionate response to themselves. Participants will then be asked to reread this response while remaining connected to their compassionate self.
Logic-based intervention
Participants assigned to this intervention will be asked to engage in one brief (10-15 minute) online logic-based exercise that was adapted from a thought record (Greenberger \& Padesky, 1995), which is often completed during cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) treatment. Participants will be asked to reread what they wrote about their feelings of shame and chose a thought central to their shame to use for this exercise. Participants will be asked to generate evidence for and against their chosen thought, and then generate a more balanced thought. After the exercise, participants will be asked to reread their newly generated more balanced thought.
Logic-based intervention
Participants assigned to this intervention will be asked to engage in one brief (10-15 minute) online logic-based exercise that was adapted from a CBT thought record. Participants will be asked to reread what they wrote about their feelings of shame and chose a thought central to their shame to use for this exercise. Participants will be asked to generate evidence for and against their chosen thought, and then generate a more balanced thought. After the exercise, participants will be asked to reread their newly generated more balanced thought.
Placebo control condition
Participants assigned to this condition will be asked to listen to a portion of an audio recording of "The Hobbit" (Tolkien, 2009) and then re-read what they wrote about their feelings of shame. They will then be asked to write a reflection about the thoughts and feelings arising from doing so. They will then be asked to re-read what they wrote in this reflection.
Placebo control condition
Participants assigned to this intervention will be asked to listen to an audio recording of "The Hobbit" and then re-read what they wrote about their feelings of shame. They will then be asked to write a reflection about the thoughts and feelings arising from doing so. They will then be asked to re-read what they wrote in this reflection.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Compassion-based intervention
Participants assigned to this intervention will be asked to engage in one brief compassion-focused exercise, where they will be asked to be asked to connect to their inner compassionate self. They will be asked to stay connected to that feeling while rereading what they wrote about their feelings of shame and imagining it was someone else who wrote it. Participants will then be asked to write a compassionate response to themselves. Participants will then be asked to reread this response while remaining connected to their compassionate self.
Logic-based intervention
Participants assigned to this intervention will be asked to engage in one brief (10-15 minute) online logic-based exercise that was adapted from a CBT thought record. Participants will be asked to reread what they wrote about their feelings of shame and chose a thought central to their shame to use for this exercise. Participants will be asked to generate evidence for and against their chosen thought, and then generate a more balanced thought. After the exercise, participants will be asked to reread their newly generated more balanced thought.
Placebo control condition
Participants assigned to this intervention will be asked to listen to an audio recording of "The Hobbit" and then re-read what they wrote about their feelings of shame. They will then be asked to write a reflection about the thoughts and feelings arising from doing so. They will then be asked to re-read what they wrote in this reflection.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Participants must be able to listen to audio clips (either via device speakers or with headphones) during their study participation.
* Participants will be adults (i.e., 18-64 years of age) with a Prolific account.
* Participants must be able to listen to audio clips (either via device speakers or with headphones) during their study participation.
* Prolific participants must also be first language English speakers.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Any duplicate survey completions from the same participant for the same study survey, as indicated by their embedded ID code in their Qualtrics data, will be excluded from analysis. For Part 1, the most complete survey completion for each participant will be retained. For Part 2, the most complete survey completion for each participant will also be retained unless the participant has begun the shame induction exercise. If a participant in Part 2 has begun the shame induction and then completes another submission, they will be excluded.
2. Participants who do not complete Part 1 measures required for primary hypotheses will also be excluded from analyses (specifically, participants who do not complete the measures of trait self-criticism and trait self-compassion).
3. Participants who complete Part 1 but are not randomized to a condition in Part 2, will be excluded from analyses related to Part 2 variables. We will run ANOVAs and/or non-parametric Kruskal Wallis tests with continuous baseline data as the DVs to test if there are any significant differences between participants who do Part 2 and those who do not. We will also run Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact tests on categorical baseline data to test if there are any significant differences between participants who do Part 2 and those who do not.
4. Participants who respond to several scales within the same survey with overly consistent responses (i.e., appear to click the same response for every scale item, even though some are reverse scored, assessed via testing of scale variances) may be excluded from analyses involving that survey. Their data from other surveys will still be retained for other analyses.
5. Participants who complete a survey in an unreasonably short or long amount of time compared to the average participant may be excluded from analyses involving that survey. Their data from other surveys will still be retained for other analyses.
6. Participants who fail half or more of the attention checks in Part 1, and the first attention check prior to randomization in Part 2 will be excluded from the data.
7. Participants who were ineligible or withdrew consent will also be excluded from the data.
8. Prolific participants who could not complete the Captcha Verification question or fail one or both of the two bot check questions will also be excluded from the analyses.
9. We will inspect the distribution of scores on trait self-criticism and consider excluding extreme outliers with very low or very high scores.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Waterloo
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Allison Kelly
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Allison C. Kelly, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Waterloo
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Greenberger, D., & Padesky, C. A. (1995). Mind over mood: A cognitive therapy treatment manual for clients. Guilford Press.
Tolkien, J. R. R. (2009). The Hobbit (E-book ed.). HarperCollins.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
45443
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.