Laparoscopy in Failed IVF

NCT ID: NCT06165484

Last Updated: 2023-12-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-31

Study Completion Date

2025-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Current in-vitro fertilization (IVF) consumers are enjoying better success rates than early seekers, but only about a quarter of IVF cycles result in a live birth and many patients remain infertile after multiple IVF attempts. Recurrent IVF failure is distressing to patients and challenging to clinicians. Despite interventions have been proposed to improve IVF outcome after couples of failed cycles, only a few of which are evidence based.

Laparoscopy, as the gold standard for the evaluation of the pelvis, was used to be the routine procedure for many reproductive physicians. It provides information on endometriosis, tubal patency, and pelvic adhesions and a chance to fix these lesions concurrently.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Current in-vitro fertilization (IVF) consumers are enjoying better success rates than early seekers, but only about a quarter of IVF cycles result in a live birth and many patients remain infertile after multiple IVF attempts. Recurrent IVF failure is distressing to patients and challenging to clinicians. Despite interventions have been proposed to improve IVF outcome after couples of failed cycles, only a few of which are evidence based.

Laparoscopy, as the gold standard for the evaluation of the pelvis, was used to be the routine procedure for many reproductive physicians. It provides information on endometriosis, tubal patency, and pelvic adhesions and a chance to fix these lesions concurrently.

The role of laparoscopy, especially in women whose normal screening tests suggest that pelvic pathology seem to be unlikely. However, sometimes a "normal" pelvic imaging can be misleading, since HSG or ultrasonography cannot to rule out hydrosalpinx and endometriosis completely. Furthermore, it has been shown that HSG is insufficient for predicting tubal potency for some patients with risk of pelvic adhesions, with a sensitivity between 0.0% and83% and specificity between 50% and 90%. When initial IVF treatments fail, can we offer the couples to choose additional cycle of IVF instead of evaluation of the potential peritoneal factor? In cases of otherwise so called "Unexplained infertility", the investigation cannot be considered complete until laparoscopy has been performed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infertility, Female

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

patient with failed ivf cycle

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

laparoscopy and hysteroscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

laparoscopy and hysteroscopy for patient with failed IVF

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

laparoscopy and hysteroscopy

laparoscopy and hysteroscopy for patient with failed IVF

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 1\. The patients ages ranged from 20 to 40 years. 2. menstrual cycles with a duration of 24 to 38 days and no ovulatory dysfunction. 3. normal findings of pelvic ultrasonography and HSG assessment, without visible lesions that could cause implantation failure, for example: endometrial polyps, submucosal myomas, uterine septum and intrauterine adhesions.

4\. hormonal values were within the normal range. 5. Semen analyses were normal according to the World Health Organization (WHO) 2010 criteria.

6\. no previous surgical treatment for endometriosis; no previous oophorectomy or salpingectomy.

7\. Patients included in the study had failed to conceive after at least one cycles of IVF-ET when indicated.

Exclusion Criteria

\- 1. Couples with severe male factor infertility. 2. Premature ovarian failure. 3. Patients with a poor ovarian reserve and poor responders. 4. Contraindication to laparoscopy such as mechanical or large abdominal mass (\> 24 weeks gestation size).

5\. Contraindication to hysteroscopy such as recent or active pelvic inflammatory disease and active uterine bleeding.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ali Saber Ali

Assistant Lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

failed IVF

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id