IVM for Patients With Low Ovarian Response. Does it Improve IVFoutcomes and Does it Improve the Following IVF Cycle?

NCT ID: NCT02498210

Last Updated: 2019-11-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

25 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-10-31

Study Completion Date

2020-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Poor ovarian response (POR) is one of the major therapeutic challenges in in vitro fertilization. Several therapeutic approaches for POR have been explored; yet, a single effective strategy has not yet been established. Recently, a live birth was reported after ovarian cortex fragmentation and in vitro disruption of the Hippo signaling pathway and activation of Akt signaling. During IVM procedure increased mechanical stimulation of the ovarian cortex takes place. , with the consequent disruption of the Hippo signaling pathway. Our aim is to investigate whether the mechanical manipulation and triggering of ovarian cortex caused by IVM can cause ovarian follicular activation and recruitment by the mechanisms mentioned above. Thus stimulation in the following regular IVF cycle will result in improved ovarian response and increased oocytes yield

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

IVM treatment in patients with low ovarian response. Does it improve IVF outcome or may it cause activation of ovarian follicles and increase the chances of success in the following IVF cycle?

Scientific background:

Poor ovarian response (POR) is one of the major therapeutic challenges in in vitro fertilization. The prevalence of poor responders patients varies in the literature between 9 and 24%, however due to the increase in childbearing age it is expected to be one of the main infertility cause. Failure to respond adequately to standard protocols and to recruit adequate follicles results in decreased oocyte production, cycle cancellation and, overall, it is associated with a significantly diminished probability of pregnancy Several therapeutic approaches for POR have been explored; yet, a single effective strategy has not yet been established. Previously it was shown that mechanical manipulation on ovarian cortex such as ovarian wedge resection or ovarian "drilling" by diathermy or laser, induced follicle growth in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patient.

Recently, a live birth was reported after ovarian cortex fragmentation and in vitro disruption of the Hippo signaling pathway and activation of Akt signaling. The treated ovarian fragments were grafted back to the patient and after follicle growth, retrieval of mature eggs, in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer; a healthy baby was delivered. The Hippo signaling pathway is essential to maintain optimal organ size and is conserved in all metazoan animals \[6-8\]. In this study it was shown that ovarian fragmentation increased actin polymerization and disrupted Hippo signaling by decreasing phosphorylated Yes-associated protein (pYAP) levels together with increased nuclear localization of YAP, leading to increased expression of CCN growth factors genes and BIRC apoptosis inhibitors. Secreted CCN2 and related factors promoted follicle growth

Genes involved in ovarian fragmentation, Hippo signaling, and follicle growth is important for ovarian physiology and pathophysiology. Ovarian fragmentation led to changes in intercellular tension and facilitated the conversion of G-actin to F-actin. Subsequent disruption of Hippo signaling decreased pYAP to total YAP ratios, leading to increased expression of downstream CCN growth factors and BIRC apoptosis inhibitors

In vitro maturation (IVM) has been practiced in a clinical setting for over a decade. It has been suggested as an alternative to conventional IVF for minimizing the risk of the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in patients with the PCOS. Recently, IVM has been proposed as the method for patients undergoing anticancer treatment, particularly for women who require rapid fertility preservation \[9\] or face the risk of estrogen-sensitive cancer recurrence involve. Although IVM has been applied to IVF poor responders with equivocal results, several researchers have shown benefits in IVM in women who have low ovarian response.

For the purpose of IVM, oocytes are retrieved from ovarian follicles as small as 4-5mm in diameter, under ultrasound guidance with a single-lumen thinner aspiration needle. The aspiration pressure is reduced compared to regular IVF. Therefore, multiple needle punctures are needed because lower aspiration pressures are used and bloody aspirates may block the thin needle lumen. Because immature oocytes are enclosed in tightly packed cumulus cells, curettage of the follicle wall is needed to dislodge the cumulus oocyte complex. All leads to the fact that during IVM procedure increased mechanical stimulation of the ovarian cortex takes place, with the consequent disruption of the Hippo signaling pathway.

Hypothesis and aims Our aim is to investigate whether the mechanical manipulation and triggering of ovarian cortex caused by IVM can cause ovarian follicular activation and recruitment by the mechanisms mentioned above. Thus stimulation in the following regular IVF cycle will result in improved ovarian response and increased oocytes yield.

Materials and Methods Patients Prospective cohort study on POR patients. Twenty five POR patients will be selected based on the bologna criteria and all patients will have at least one documented POR cycle.

IVM protocol POR patients will be treated in IVM cycle according to our IVF unit protocol, using FSH-priming . Briefly, a baseline evaluation that included a hormonal profile and an ultrasound scan was performed on day 3 of the menstrual cycle. On day 3, 150 IU/day recombinant FSH was added for 3 days. A second evaluation was performed on day 6 of the menstrual cycle. An injection of 10,000 IU hCG (Pregnyl; Organon, Oss, Holland) was administered subcutaneously when the endometrial thickness will be ≥6 mm and the leading follicle will be at least 12 mm. Oocyte retrieval will be performed under ultrasound guidance with a 19G single-lumen aspiration needle (Cook; Queensland, Australia) with a reduced aspiration pressure of 7.5 kPa. The follicular fluid will be collected in culture tubes containing follicle flush buffer (Cook) with 2 IU/ml heparin. Because of the difficulty in identifying compacted oocyte complexes, all aspirates were filtered to identify the additional oocytes.

In-Vitro Oocyte Maturation Germinal vesicles and M1 oocytes will be cultured in IVM medium (Sage; CT, USA) supplemented with 75 IU FSH and 75IU luteinizing hormone (LH; Ferring, Keil, Germany) and checked for maturity between 24-48 hours after culture. Mature oocytes were will be denuded of the granulosa cells and fertilized by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). After ICSI, the oocytes will be transferred into IVF medium. Fertilization will be assessed 18 hours after ICSI by examining the oocytes for the appearance of two distinct pronuclei (2PN) and the extrusion of two polar bodies.

IVF protocol Following the IVM treatment, if the patient failed to conceive, she will be offered a conventional IVF treatment, using the same controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol, as in her previous IVF treatment (prior to the IVM cycle). Each patient will serve as her own control.

Outcome measurements Outcome measurements will include controlled ovarian hyperstimulation variables, number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes on the day of the aspiration, fertilization rate, embryos quality and number of embryos transferred.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infertility Female

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

IVF after IVM

If the patients will not concive during the IVM cycle . results of this following IVF cycle will be compared to the initial IVF preformance

Intervention : In Vitro Maturation Procedure

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

In Vitro Maturation Procedure

Intervention Type OTHER

POR patients will be treated in IVM cycle. After baseline evaluation on day 3, 150 IU/day recombinant FSH or HMG will be added for 3 days. A second evaluation will be performed on day 6 of the menstrual cycle. An injection of 10,000 IU hCG (Pregnyl; Organon, Oss, Holland) or Ovitrelle 250mcg (Merck Serono ) will be administered subcutaneously when the endometrial thickness will be ≥6 mm and the leading follicle will be at least 12 mm. Oocyte retrieval will be performed under ultrasound guidance with a 19G single-lumen aspiration needle (Cook; Queensland, Australia). The follicular fluid will be collected in culture tubes containing follicle flush buffer (Cook) with 2 IU/ml heparin. All aspirates were filtered to identify additional oocytes

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

In Vitro Maturation Procedure

POR patients will be treated in IVM cycle. After baseline evaluation on day 3, 150 IU/day recombinant FSH or HMG will be added for 3 days. A second evaluation will be performed on day 6 of the menstrual cycle. An injection of 10,000 IU hCG (Pregnyl; Organon, Oss, Holland) or Ovitrelle 250mcg (Merck Serono ) will be administered subcutaneously when the endometrial thickness will be ≥6 mm and the leading follicle will be at least 12 mm. Oocyte retrieval will be performed under ultrasound guidance with a 19G single-lumen aspiration needle (Cook; Queensland, Australia). The follicular fluid will be collected in culture tubes containing follicle flush buffer (Cook) with 2 IU/ml heparin. All aspirates were filtered to identify additional oocytes

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Poor ovarian response IVF cycle

Exclusion Criteria

Normal ovarian response

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sheba Medical Center

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ettie Maman, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sheba Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sheba Medical Center

Kiryat Ono, , Israel

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ettie Maman, MD

Role: CONTACT

972526666451

Raoul Orvieto, MD

Role: CONTACT

972-53-7678933

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

ettie maman, MD

Role: primary

97235302882

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Venetis CA, Kolibianakis EM, Tarlatzi TB, Tarlatzis BC. Evidence-based management of poor ovarian response. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Sep;1205:199-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05665.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20840273 (View on PubMed)

Shanbhag S, Aucott L, Bhattacharya S, Hamilton MA, McTavish AR. Interventions for 'poor responders' to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in in-vitro fertilisation (IVF). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;(1):CD004379. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004379.pub2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17253503 (View on PubMed)

STEIN IF Sr. The management of bilateral polycystic ovaries. Fertil Steril. 1955 May-Jun;6(3):189-205. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)31980-x. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14380378 (View on PubMed)

Farquhar C, Brown J, Marjoribanks J. Laparoscopic drilling by diathermy or laser for ovulation induction in anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD001122. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001122.pub4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22696324 (View on PubMed)

Kawamura K, Cheng Y, Suzuki N, Deguchi M, Sato Y, Takae S, Ho CH, Kawamura N, Tamura M, Hashimoto S, Sugishita Y, Morimoto Y, Hosoi Y, Yoshioka N, Ishizuka B, Hsueh AJ. Hippo signaling disruption and Akt stimulation of ovarian follicles for infertility treatment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 22;110(43):17474-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1312830110. Epub 2013 Sep 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24082083 (View on PubMed)

Dong J, Feldmann G, Huang J, Wu S, Zhang N, Comerford SA, Gayyed MF, Anders RA, Maitra A, Pan D. Elucidation of a universal size-control mechanism in Drosophila and mammals. Cell. 2007 Sep 21;130(6):1120-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.019.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17889654 (View on PubMed)

Hergovich A. Mammalian Hippo signalling: a kinase network regulated by protein-protein interactions. Biochem Soc Trans. 2012 Feb;40(1):124-8. doi: 10.1042/BST20110619.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22260677 (View on PubMed)

Maman E, Meirow D, Brengauz M, Raanani H, Dor J, Hourvitz A. Luteal phase oocyte retrieval and in vitro maturation is an optional procedure for urgent fertility preservation. Fertil Steril. 2011 Jan;95(1):64-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.064. Epub 2010 Aug 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20688325 (View on PubMed)

Li J, Xu Y, Zhou G, Guo J, Xin N. Natural cycle IVF/IVM may be more desirable for poor responder patients after failure of stimulated cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011 Sep;28(9):791-5. doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9597-6. Epub 2011 Jun 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21695516 (View on PubMed)

Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L; ESHRE working group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition. ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1616-24. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der092. Epub 2011 Apr 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21505041 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SHEBA-14-1604-EM-CTIL

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responders
NCT02195947 COMPLETED PHASE4
Laparoscopy in Failed IVF
NCT06165484 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA