Comparison Between External Oblique Intercostal Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block in PCNL
NCT ID: NCT06131151
Last Updated: 2023-11-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
54 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-11-30
2024-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comaprison Between QLB and ESPB in Patients for PCNL Operation
NCT04277611
Lower Thoracic Epidural vs Erector Spinae Block for PNL
NCT05725083
Paravertebral Block Versus Erector Spinae Plain Block In Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT04998435
Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT06078241
Ultrasound Guided Rhomboid Intercostal Subserratus Plane Block vs Erector Spinae Plane Block in Open Nephrectomy
NCT05822011
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Percautaneous nephrolithotomy is the tretment of choice for patients with multiple or complex kidney or upper urinary tract stones. visceral pain from the kidney and ureter and somatic pain from the incision site are the primary cause of immediate postoperative pain following PCNL. poor pain control is associated with unwanted consequences such as patient discomfort, delayed recovery, and prolonged hospital stay.
This necessitates meticulous multi-modality analgesia due to mild to moderate pain originating from renal capsule dilatation or nephrostomy tube-related stress during the first 24 h after operation. Multimodal analgesia techniques are utilized broadly to manage postoperative pain. The concept of multimodal analgesia implies not only providing analgesic drugs, but also performing nerve blocks with local anaesthetics.
first described the Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB), the indications and clinical use of the block for different surgical interventions have been growing. Although ESPB is interfacial plane block, anatomical studies support the idea that some of its clinical benefit may derive from spread to the paravertebral and epidural space. External oblique intercostal (EOI) block is relatively new block technique modified aiming at obtaining upper midline and lateral abdominal wall analgesia. EOI block is achived by injecting the local anesthetic solution into the fascial plane on the deep aspect of the external oblique muscle. Previous studies have hypothesized that the block succesfully anesthetized the lateral cutaneous branch and the anterior cutaneous branch of the thoracoabdominal nerves, with low pain scores and minimal narcotic use postoperatively.
Recently, there have been several publications describing external oblique nerve blocks to control post-operativte pain after abdominal surgery.
Aim of the work:
The aim of this study is to compare the post-operative analgesic effect of USG unilateral External oblique intercostal (EOI) block with Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with a hypothesis that both External oblique intercostal fascial plane block and Erector spinae plane block are effective in providing postoperative analgesia.
Sample size calculation:
Based on the results of a previous study, a sample size of 21 patients in each group will be calculated to detect a 20% difference in the time to first analgesic request, with alfa=0.05 and a power of 85%. Twenty-seven patients in each group will be recruited to compensate for the dropouts.
Group A: will include 27 patients, will receive External Oblique Intercostal Block.
Group B: will include 27 patients, will receive Erector Spinae Plane Block. Randomization will be performed using an online random number generator. concealment was achieved using sealed opaque envelopes.
A) Anesthesia induction:
Standard monitoring procedures will include pulse oximetry, electrocardiography, and noninvasive arterial pressure prior to anesthetic induction. All patients will be premedicated with intravenous (i.v.) midazolam 1-2 mg and antibiotic prophylaxis, according to the hospitals protocol. Anesthesia will be induced with intravenously (IV) adminestrated propofol. 2mg/kg, fentanyl 1mic/kg, and recuronium bromide 0.6 mg/kg following which endotracheal intubation will be performed. Anesthesia will be maintained with oxygen, air, and isoflurane using controlled ventilation with closed circuit in order to ensure normocarbia. At the end of the surgery, patients will receive their intervention according to gorup allocation under sterile conditions.
B) Intervention:
1. External Oblique Intercistal Block:
A high frequency linear ultrasound probe will be placed in a longitudinal parasagital orientation in the anterior midaxillary line. A 21G 10 cm needle will be inserted using an in-plane approach. The tip of the needle will be placed into the fascial plane on the deep aspect of the external oblique muscle. A volume of 20 ml of LA (20 ml of bupivacaine 0.375% plus 5 ug/ml adrenaline. ) will be injected.
2. Erector Spinae Plane block:
A high frequency linear ultrasound probe will be placed in a longitudinal parasagital orientation 2.5-3 cm lateral to the T9 spinous process. A 21G 10 cm needle will be inserted using an in-place approach. The tip of the needle will be placed into the fascial plane on the top of the aspect of the erector spinae muscle. A volume of 20 ml of LA (20 ml of bupivacaine 0.375% plus 5 ug/ml adrenaline. ) will be injected.
Peimary Outcome:
The first call for rescue analgesia.
Secondary Outcome:
1. The total analgesic requirement in 24 hours.
2. Any adverse effects related to anesthesia or the technique.
3. Pain scores; Numerical Rating Scales (NRS) at rest and when coughing (at 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 hours postoperatively.)
4. Block related complications during and after block procedure till 24 hours postoperatively (local anesthetic systemic toxicity, pneumothorax and vascular puncture during block procedure).
Statistical Analysis:
Continous data with normal distribution will be compared by paired or unpaired t-tests, whereas non-normally distributed data will be assessed using the Mann- Whitney U test and Wilcoxon ranksum test for unpaired and paired results, respectively. Chi-square test or fisher's exact test will measure the association between qualitative variables.
P-valve\>0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
External Oblique Intercostal Block
27 patients will receive External Oblique Intercostal Block. A volume of 20 ml of LA (20 ml of bupivacaine 0.375% plus 5 ug/ml adrenaline ) will be injected.
Nerve block
Nerve block in percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Erector Spinae Plane Block
27 patients will receive Erector Spinae Plane Block. A volume of 20 ml of LA (20 ml of bupivacaine 0.375% plus 5 ug/ml adrenaline ) will be injected.
Nerve block
Nerve block in percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Nerve block
Nerve block in percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rehab Gomaa Ismail
Assistant Lecturer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Amr Thabet
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Department of anesthesia, intensive care and pain management
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EOI Block
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.