A Study to Compare the Results of FGFR Testing by Either ctDNA Blood Testing or Standard Tumor Tissue Testing
NCT ID: NCT06129084
Last Updated: 2025-12-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
260 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-01-11
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this study, Investigators will test the patient's blood for these genetic changes in addition to the tumor tissue samples. It is thought that the blood test will give a more accurate result.
Investigators hope this study will help to find out if more patients can benefit from erdafitinib than the ones identified by tissue testing only.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Integrated Molecular Profiling in Advanced Cancers Trial
NCT01505400
Development and Validation of Harbinger Health Test for Early Cancer Detection
NCT05435066
A Study to Identify Participants With Urothelial Cancer and Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Gene Aberrations
NCT03955913
cfDNA Assay Prospective Observational Validation for Early Cancer Detection and Minimal Residual Disease
NCT05366881
HRD Status Reference Standard Based on WGS
NCT06490380
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this study, patients will undergo circulating tumor DNA testing, in addition to conventional tissue testing, for treatment eligibility. Investigators hypothesize that blood-based ctDNA testing will provide a more accurate assessment of somatic FGFR status than same patient archival primary tissue.
This study's objectives are:
Objective 1 (Primary): To evaluate the diagnostic value of ctDNA testing against the "gold standard" of tissue testing.
Objective 2 (Secondary): To evaluate whether ctDNA may be a superior predictive marker by identifying actionable FGFR alterations that are currently missed on tissue assays.
Procedures:
* Medical history will be reviewed, including all previous anti-cancer treatments.
* A blood sample will be collected for ctDNA testing at the time of screening for FGFR alterations and at progression under erdafitinib therapy. Test results will be compared to archival tissue testing.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Metastatic Bladder Cancer
Patients with metastatic bladder cancer who will have archival tissue sent for FGFR testing.
FGFR Testing
Determine whether ctDNA testing for FGFR provides the same results as the standard tissue testing.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
FGFR Testing
Determine whether ctDNA testing for FGFR provides the same results as the standard tissue testing.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Vancouver Prostate Centre
OTHER
Lady Davis Institute
OTHER
Bladder Cancer Canada
UNKNOWN
Bernie Eigl
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bernie Eigl
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bernhard Eigl
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
British Columbia Cancer Agency
Alexander Wyatt
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Vancouver Prostate Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Arthur J.E Child Comprehensive Cancer Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Cross Cancer Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
BC Cancer Agency
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
CHU de Québec-Université Laval
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Knowles MA, Hurst CD. Molecular biology of bladder cancer: new insights into pathogenesis and clinical diversity. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015 Jan;15(1):25-41. doi: 10.1038/nrc3817.
Loriot Y, Necchi A, Park SH, Garcia-Donas J, Huddart R, Burgess E, Fleming M, Rezazadeh A, Mellado B, Varlamov S, Joshi M, Duran I, Tagawa ST, Zakharia Y, Zhong B, Stuyckens K, Santiago-Walker A, De Porre P, O'Hagan A, Avadhani A, Siefker-Radtke AO; BLC2001 Study Group. Erdafitinib in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 25;381(4):338-348. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1817323.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ctDNA FGFR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.