Biomechanical Informational Effect of Innovative Double or Triple Dental Abutment-implant: Case-series

NCT ID: NCT06127576

Last Updated: 2023-11-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

55 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-09-01

Study Completion Date

2023-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objective: The aim of this case series study is to present the rationality and scientific evidence of a new design for a Double and Triple abutment with their specific new concept of Biodynamic Optimized Peri-implant Tissue (BOPiT).

Methods: The innovative design of these abutments with a paraboloid geometry was based on BOPiT, simultaneously involving the principles of mechanobiology, biotensegrity, and mechanotransduction. Thus, individuals rehabilitated with different extents of edentulous spaces using the innovative double and triple abutments on osseointegrated dental implants are included in this case series. The double and triple abutments support 2 or 3 dental crowns on a single implant, respectively. Clinic and radiographic examinations are presented at T1 (loading after 4 months of the implant insertion surgeries with the appropriate metalloceramic prostheses) and T2 \[final examination with a follow-up time ≥ 3 to 12 years (average of 7.2 years)\].

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conception and design of the Double Abutment (DA) and Triple Abutment (TA): Scientific Rationality Traditional abutments are generally cylindrical nowadays, having two curved edges at the base and an edge that connects the two vertices on the side face (total of 3 edges) considering its strength as a unit, while the new DA and TA features a paraboloid geometric design along its entire length.

The paraboloid is a mathematical equation that generates quadric surfaces of two types: elliptic and hyperbolic. The elliptic paraboloid is shaped like an oval-shaped cup and can have a maximum or minimum point. In an appropriate coordinate system, with the three axes x, y and z, it can be represented by the equation: z/c=x2 /a2 + y2 /b2, where a and b are constants that determine the degree of curvature in the x-z and y-z planes, respectively (an elliptic paraboloid opens upwards). The hyperbolic paraboloid, or hypar, is a doubly ruled surface (composed of multiple lines, whose union forms the surface itself), usually saddle-shaped. Its coordinated system is also based on three axes, manifested in the equation: z/c = y2/b2 - x2/a2. For c\>0, i.e., a hyperbolic paraboloid that opens downward along the x-axis and along the y-axis (i.e., the parabola in the x=0 plane is open upward and the parabola in the y=0 plane opens downward).

The design of DA (elliptical paraboloid) and TA (hyperbolic paraboloid) allows high stiffness with reduced bending stresses and equalization of forces. Additionally, TA hyperbolic paraboloid structures are the most complex and possess a unique combination of structural and architectural properties, resultant from its double curvature, concave convex and suited to carry the in-plane shear forces and transmit uniform eccentric axial forces to the other members of the system. Vectorial loads are minimized, preventing the traditional axis of transverse coordinates that imply early bone loss in the implant abutment connection area. These designs represent the interaction that exists between all biological phenomena and mathematics.

The new abutments are multiple mechanical load organizers, and support 2 (DA) or 3 (TA) crowns on each abutment, with an innovative geometric design that is totally passive (no welds), resulting from mathematical and physical conformations coupled in geometric vector models.

DA and TA are protected by the following patents: "Pilar geminado sobre implante osseointegrado e corretivo extensor compensatório de inclinações" \[Double abutment on osseointegrated implant and compensating inclination extensor corrector (PI BR 0505827-9)\]; "Splint abutment over osseointegrated implant and compensatory slanted coping" (United States Patent 9039416 and Canadian Patent No. 2,630,592); "System of triple abutments with connect (United States Patent 11,701,206); "Sistema de pilares trigeminados e múltiplos sobre implantes osseointegrados e guias direcionadores" \[Triple and multiple abutments on osseointegrated implants and guide directors (PI BR 0800298-3, Brazil)\]. All patents belong to the Institute of Technology and Research (Instituto de Tecnologia e Pesquisa -, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil).

Patients This clinical investigation was designed as a pre-post case series study and is reported in accordance with the PROCESS (Preferred Reporting of Case Series in Surgery) and Consensus-based Clinical Case Reporting Guideline Development. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki, revised in 2013, and received approval from the Ethics Research Committee of the Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil (CAEE: 60410222.2.0000.5149).

The selected group of participants were informed about the procedures and signed an informed consent form before participating in the study. Patients were recruited from a private clinic in the city of Belo Horizonte - Brazil (BR), between September 2009 and January 2019.

Participants were in good systemic health, non-diabetic and non-smokers. Prior to dental implant insertion surgeries, pre-surgical evaluation, detailed oral examination including complete periodontal examination, dental biofilm control and coronary polishing, as well as scaling and root planning and treatment of carious lesions (when necessary) were performed.

Since these new abutments break important paradigms in implant dentistry, such as passive multiple prostheses supported on a single implant with biomechanical benefits, the investigators have cautiously chosen to perform only \~5 cases/year, aiming at reaching a minimum follow-up time of 5 years.

This consecutive case series comprises a sample of 37 individuals/43 cases (16 men and 21 women) with different extensions of edentulous spaces rehabilitated using DA (n=28) and TA (n=15) in 43 osseointegrated implants. All cases using DA and TA had occlusal function with their respective antagonistic pairs (natural, restored or implanted teeth). Radiographic exams (analogue or digital) are presented at T1 (loading after 4 months of implant insertion surgeries with the appropriate metal-ceramic prostheses) and at T2 (final exam) with an average follow-up time of 7.2 years (\>3 to 12 years).

The implants were cylindrical with internal hexagon and without surface treatment, presenting 4.0 mm in diameter and length varying between 10 and 13 mm (Neodent® - Grupo Straumann, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil).

Clinical and laboratorial procedures

(a) Selection of components for molding: analogues, transfers and Universal Cast to Long Abutment (UCLA) with metallic base in cobalt chromium compatible with the diameters and type of hexagon of the implant system platforms installed (all cases in this study being with internal hexagon); (b) molding of the osseointegrated implant using a compatible transfer and antagonists; (c) Confection of the manual work model; (d) use of UCLA with metallic base to adapt the design of DA or TA in acrylic, with individualized design according to the measurements and paraboloid surfaces of the DA (elliptical) and TA (hyperbolic). The use of angulation in DA and TA is individualized, versatile and dependent on the position of the implant, when necessary; (d) casting the pillars in cobalt chromium alloy and polishing.; (e) Confection of crowns according to the chosen material (porcelain or resins) and (f) the DA or TA abutments are screwed into the mouth and the crowns cemented. All laboratorial procedures were performed in one single dental laboratory.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Implant

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

paraboloid geometry double and triple dental abutment-implant

paraboloid geometry double and triple dental abutment-implant

Intervention Type DEVICE

The implants were inserted with the margin between machined and micro-rough surface at bone level. The abutment and crowns were assembled and screw retained onto the implant with a torque of 35 Ncm.

The implants were cylindrical with internal hexagon and without surface treatment, presenting 4.0 mm in diameter and length varying between 10 and 13 mm.

Acording to the manual work model measurements, DA or TA acrylic individualized design and paraboloid surfaces of the DA (elliptical) and TA (hyperbolic) had been made.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

paraboloid geometry double and triple dental abutment-implant

The implants were inserted with the margin between machined and micro-rough surface at bone level. The abutment and crowns were assembled and screw retained onto the implant with a torque of 35 Ncm.

The implants were cylindrical with internal hexagon and without surface treatment, presenting 4.0 mm in diameter and length varying between 10 and 13 mm.

Acording to the manual work model measurements, DA or TA acrylic individualized design and paraboloid surfaces of the DA (elliptical) and TA (hyperbolic) had been made.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* good systemic health
* non-diabetic
* non-smokers
* implant replacement need

Exclusion Criteria

* former and current smokers
* diabetes
* periodontitis
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Federal University of Minas Gerais

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fernando O Costa

Titular Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fernando O Costa, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Federal University of Minas Gerais

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Federal University of Minas Gerais, Dental School

Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5895732

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.