Patient-specific Finite Element Analysis of Immediate Loading in the Edentulous Maxilla: Comparison of Three Implant Configurations Using Digital Twins.

NCT ID: NCT07266896

Last Updated: 2025-12-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-11-02

Study Completion Date

2023-11-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rehabilitation of severely atrophic edentulous maxillae with dental implants pose a significant clinical challenge. Immediate loading in grafted bone is often debated due to concerns about stress distribution and osseointegration. This study aimed to compare stress distribution in the maxilla using three full-arch implant configurations-all-on-four, all-on-six, and quad-zygomatic implants-in a single patient, to determine the safest and most favorable approach for immediate loading in grafted bone. Two CBCT scans from a 64-year-old female patient, before and after bone grafting (allograft with onlay grafting and sinus augmentation), were used to generate three patient-specific finite element models. Each model included the maxilla, implants in the respective configuration, abutments, and a full-arch prosthesis. Von Mises stresses in cortical and cancellous bone, implants, abutments, and prosthesis, as well as maximum bone displacement, were analyzed. Our results demonstrated that the all-on-six configuration provided the most favorable biomechanical outcome, with homogeneous cortical stress distribution, reduced stress in implants and prosthesis, and bone displacement fully compatible with immediate loading in grafted bone. The all-on-four model showed stress peaks at tilted abutments and cantilevers, whereas the quad-zygomatic model distributed implant and abutment stresses efficiently but induced higher cortical bone stresses, still within physiological limits.This patient-specific digital twin study demonstrates that immediate loading in full-arch grafted bone is biomechanically safe and optimal, with the all-on-six configuration providing superior stress distribution. These findings support clinical decision-making for immediate loading protocols and highlight the value of patient-specific FEA in planning complex maxillary rehabilitations.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

numerical study

CBTS Scans (Cone Beam Computed Tomography) perform as part of routine care

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Edentulous maxillae, have had full-arch bone reconstruction

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de Nice

Nice, Alpes Maritimes, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

25Odonto07

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.