Effects of the Shared-decision Making Training Program

NCT ID: NCT06121076

Last Updated: 2023-11-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

72 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-06-01

Study Completion Date

2023-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this intervention study is to test the effectiveness of a training program for hospital-based midwives. The main questions it aims to answer are: •Does SDM combined EBP training improve midwives' SDM and EBP competency? • What are factors related to SDM competency in midwives? Participants will participate in a 20-hour training program, including lectures and hands-on practice sessions. Researchers will compare groups that receive SDM training with or without EBP training to see if there are changes in midwives' SDM and EBP competency.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of SDM training program, with or without EBP, on the level of midwives' SDM and EBP competency. This randomized controlled trial recruited participants from 18 departments of an obstetrics and gynecology hospital in Vietnam. 72 midwives (36 in each group) and 404 patients were required. Eligible midwives were ones who provided the hands-on care of patients for at least three months, were licensed to practice midwifery, and were willing to participate in the study. Each participating midwife conducted three encounters with real patients who were conveniently selected. Patients at least 18 years old, having SURE test scores less than 4, and willing to participate in the study were invited. Patients requiring emergency medical attention were excluded. The intervention group received a tailored training program that combined SDM with EBP, while the control group received SDM training alone. The outcomes related to SDM (measured by SDM-Q-Doc, SDM-Q-9, DSC, OPTION5, DSAT10, and 4HCS) and EBP (measured by HS-EBP) were evaluated at baseline, Week 2, and/or Week 4.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Competence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SDM-EBP training

the group received SDM combined with EBP training

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SDM-EBP training

Intervention Type OTHER

A 20-hour tailored SDM combined with EBP training program consisting of a seven-hour lecture and a four-hour hands-on practice session.

control

the group received received SDM without EBP training

Group Type OTHER

SDM-EBP training

Intervention Type OTHER

A 20-hour tailored SDM combined with EBP training program consisting of a seven-hour lecture and a four-hour hands-on practice session.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SDM-EBP training

A 20-hour tailored SDM combined with EBP training program consisting of a seven-hour lecture and a four-hour hands-on practice session.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* provide hands-on care to patients for at least three months
* licensed to practice midwifery
* willing to participate in the study.


* having SURE test score less than 4 (SURE was a decisional conflict screening tool. A score less than 4 was a positive result for decisional conflict)
* willing to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients requiring emergency medical attention
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Quyen Thao Nguyen

lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mei-ling Yeh, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Obstetric hospital

Ho Chi Minh City, , Vietnam

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Vietnam

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SdmEbp2023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.