Pain Rating Challenges and Patterns

NCT ID: NCT06115278

Last Updated: 2024-07-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

191 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-03-21

Study Completion Date

2024-02-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Our long-term goal is to improve pain communication for patients' health. For this project, we seek information on patients' and health care nurses' (1) mental effort when choosing or understanding, respectively, pain intensity ratings, and (2) confidence in the accuracy of pain intensity rating patterns. This information will clarify the importance of mental effort from pain ratings and the probability of pain intensity rating patterns.

Our primary aim will compare patients' and nurses' perceptions of the mental effort of choosing (Aim 2a) and understanding (Aim 2b) pain intensity ratings. We hypothesize that patients will rate mental effort higher than nurses for choosing ratings and lower than nurses for understanding ratings. The results will inform future efforts to improve pain communication between patients and nurses.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Our long-term goal is to improve pain communication for patients' health. For this project, we seek information on patients' and health care nurses' {1} mental effort when choosing or understanding, respectively, pain intensity ratings, and {2} confidence in the accuracy of pain intensity rating patterns. This information will clarify the importance of mental effort from pain ratings and the probability of pain intensity rating patterns.

Aim 1 {exploratory} will compare the mental effort of choosing {Aim 1a} and understanding {Aim1b different pain intensity rating scales. We hypothesize mental effort will be lower for {a} the "worst pain you have ever felt" scale than "worst pain you can think of" scale, {b} a 7-day recall period than a 1-month recall period, and {c} focus on one body area than summarizing across body areas. The results will clarify the impact of pain intensity scales' characteristics on mental effort.

Aim 2 {primary} will compare patients' and nurses' perceptions of the mental effort of choosing {Aim 2a} and understanding {Aim 2b} pain intensity ratings. We hypothesize that patients will rate mental effort higher than nurses for choosing ratings and lower than nurses for understanding ratings. The results will inform future efforts to improve pain communication between patients and nurses.

Aim 3 {exploratory} will determine the relationship between perceptions of mental effort and the importance of decreasing that mental effort for patients {Aim 3a} and nurses {Aim 3b}. We hypothesize perceptions of mental effort will positively correlate with the importance of decreasing mental effort. The results will clarify the importance of mental effort for pain intensity ratings.

Aim 4 {exploratory} will evaluate the equivalence of patients' and nurses' confidence in the accuracy of fictional pain intensity rating patterns. We hypothesize that patients' and nurses' confidence in the accuracy will be equally low because the patterns tested should be improbable. Future studies may investigate the ability of improbable pain intensity rating patterns to evaluate the usability and psychometrics of pain measures.

Aim 5 {exploratory} will test the relationship between confidence in the accuracy of fictional pain intensity rating patterns and the importance of increasing that confidence for patients {Aim 5a} and nurses {Aim 5b}. We hypothesize confidence will negatively correlate with the importance of increasing confidence. The results will clarify the importance of confidence in pain intensity rating accuracy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

nurses

Our inclusion criteria for the nurses are the following: (1) 18 years old or older; (2) currently employed as a licensed nurse; and (3) current employment duties include routinely assessing the musculoskeletal pain of cognitively intact, adult outpatients. Our exclusion criteria for the nurses are the following: (1) currently managing a painful musculoskeletal condition; and (2) has ever felt musculoskeletal pain on most days for 3 months or longer.

survey

Intervention Type OTHER

survey

patients

Our inclusion criteria for the patients are the following: (1) 18 years old or older; (2) currently being treated by a health care provider for a painful musculoskeletal condition; (3) has felt a usual musculoskeletal pain intensity rating of "2" or higher on a "0" to "10" scale over the last 24 hours; (4) has felt extreme pain that completely disappeared; (5) has felt musculoskeletal pain on most days of the last 3 months; (6) chronic musculoskeletal pain has increased and decreased during the last 3 months; and (6) has felt musculoskeletal pain in more than one location on most days of the last 3 months. Our exclusion criterion for the patients is ever employed as a licensed health care provider.

survey

Intervention Type OTHER

survey

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

survey

survey

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years old or older;
* currently being treated by a health care provider for a painful musculoskeletal condition;
* has felt a usual musculoskeletal pain intensity rating of "2" or higher on a "0" to "10" scale over the last 24 hours;
* has felt extreme pain that completely disappeared;
* has felt musculoskeletal pain on most days of the last 3 months;
* chronic musculoskeletal pain has increased and decreased during the last 3 months; and
* has felt musculoskeletal pain in more than one location on most days of the last 3 months.

Our exclusion criterion for the patients is:

• ever employed as a licensed health care provider.


* 18 years old or older;
* currently employed as a licensed nurse; and
* current employment duties include routinely assessing the musculoskeletal pain of cognitively intact, adult outpatients.

Exclusion Criteria

* currently managing a painful musculoskeletal condition; and
* has ever felt musculoskeletal pain on most days for 3 months or longer.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

110 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Missouri-Columbia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Erin Dannecker

Associate Professor & Director Of Scholarly Activity

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Missouri - Columbia

Columbia, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2091563

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

HELP Pain Training Program
NCT05698290 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Pain Modulation Effectiveness (PME)
NCT05783362 COMPLETED NA