Healthcare Professional Students' Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Chronic Pain Management.

NCT ID: NCT03522857

Last Updated: 2019-10-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1150 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-11-15

Study Completion Date

2019-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Chronic pain affects from one third to one half of the population in the UK (Fayaz et al, 2016). The cost and burden of chronic pain is significant to health services worldwide. The affects of chronic pain are widespread upon the lives of those affected. Health professionals need to be better equipped than at present to manage pain and current chronic pain management knowledge in healthcare is poor. Briggs et al 2011 described the hours of pain education delivered at undergraduate level as 'woefully inadequate'. The International Association for Study of Pain (IASP) defined curricula for pain education at undergraduate level 6 years ago but current levels of knowledge at undergraduate health professional level are not widely known. This study aims to establish this at the outset of a pre-registration health professional courses and at the end of these courses.

This study aims to identify the baseline knowledge and attitudes of pre-registration healthcare students in Universities throughout UK and Ireland toward chronic pain management. The disciplines targeted are nursing, midwifery, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, diagnostic radiography and paramedics.

It is a cross sectional study that compares attitudes and knowledge of first year and final year pre-registration healthcare students in the UK and Ireland. These parameters are measured using the HC-PAIRS measure and Revised Neurophysiology Questionnaire respectively. In addition anonymous data is collected pertaining to participant characteristics which are institute of study, age, gender, level and discipline of study to enable a comparison between these parameters.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Chronic pain is characterised by a protective mechanism of the neuro-immune-endocrine systems potentially exacerbated by loading exposures, conditioning, psychological, socio-economic, lifestyle, comorbid mental health and non-modifiables such as genetics, (O'Sullivan et al 2016). Pain education can be a useful basis for helping patients to manage their symptoms and return to good daily function. However a biomedical approach to chronic pain persists in medical communities, whilst persistent pain populations increase and incidences of opioid addiction are growing secondary to poor pain management. Biomedical models of pain are likely to induce fear avoidant behaviour and exacerbate chronicity (Wertli et al 2014). In order to change the prevailing biomedical approach to chronic pain the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) have provided detailed pain curricula content for different medical and allied health professional courses. Briggs et al (2015) found that out of 15 'representative European countries' less than a handful of universities from 3 countries had implemented distinctly identifiable pain education teaching. However they may be other forms of pain education that are taking place in pre-registration healthcare professional education. This study aims to establish the levels of chronic pain management knowledge and attitudes prevail in the UK and Ireland amongst pre-registration healthcare professionals.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Pain Student Education Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Teesside University

nursing, midwifery, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, diagnostic radiography, paramedics

No interventions assigned to this group

Glasgow Caledonian University

nursing, midwifery, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, diagnostic radiography, paramedics

No interventions assigned to this group

Northumbria University

nursing, midwifery, physiotherapy, occupational therapy

No interventions assigned to this group

University of Nottingham

Physiotherapy, nursing and midwifery

No interventions assigned to this group

Curtin University

Physiotherapy

No interventions assigned to this group

Notre Dame University

Physiotherapy

No interventions assigned to this group

University College Dublin

Physiotherapists

No interventions assigned to this group

Leeds Beckett University

Physiotherapists

No interventions assigned to this group

University College Cork

Physiotherapists

No interventions assigned to this group

Robert Gordon University

OT, Physio, Midwifery, Nursing, Diagnostic radiography

No interventions assigned to this group

University of Ulster

Physiotherapy

No interventions assigned to this group

University of Limerick

OT, Physio, Midwifery, Nursing, Diagnostic radiography, paramedic

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- pre-registration healthcare student, BSc or MSc.

Exclusion Criteria

\- post-registration students
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

King's College London

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Glasgow Caledonian University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Nottingham

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Northumbria University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Leeds Beckett University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Teesside University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mrs Jagjit Mankelow

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jagjit Mankelow, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Teesside University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Teesside University

Middlesbrough, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mankelow J, Ryan CG, Taylor PC, Casey MB, Naisby J, Thompson K, McVeigh JG, Seenan C, Cooper K, Hendrick P, Brown D, Gibson W, Travers M, Kennedy N, O'Riordan C, Martin D. International, multi-disciplinary, cross-section study of pain knowledge and attitudes in nursing, midwifery and allied health professions students. BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jul 15;22(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03488-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35840942 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SA 144/17

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.