Comparison of Different Methods for Determining Endotracheal Cuff Pressure

NCT ID: NCT06107998

Last Updated: 2024-01-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

176 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-11-02

Study Completion Date

2024-01-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to test whether the stethoscope can be used as a method of assessing endotracheal cuff pressure as effectively as a manometer and also to compare it with the balloon palpation/audible leak method frequently used in clinical practice in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Is the stethoscope as effective as a manometer in assessing endotracheal cuff pressure?
* Is there a difference between stethoscope and audible leak/balloon palpation methods in assessing endotracheal cuff pressure? Participants will be randomly divided into 2 groups.
* Group P: After intubation, endotracheal cuff pressure will be assessed by audible leak/balloon palpation.
* Group S: After intubation, endotracheal cuff pressure will be assessed with a stethoscope.
* Control will be carried out with a manometer and the pressure values obtained in the groups will be corrected.

Researchers will compare ''stethoscope'' and ''audible leak/balloon palpation'' groups to see if which method is effective like a manometer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Although the use of a manometer is recommended in daily practice to evaluate endotracheal tube cuff pressure for intubated patients, the cuff is still inflated using balloon palpation or audible leakage methods in many centers. Manometers may not be available in most centers. An acceptable cuff pressure ranges from 20 to 30 cm H2O. While the risk of aspiration increases below 20 cm H2O, at values above 30 cm H2O the circulation of the tracheal mucosa begins to deteriorate and related complications like ulceration, stenosis, and even fistula may develop.

The authors hypothesize that the stethoscope is as effective as a manometer in assessing endotracheal tube cuff pressure where a manometer is not available.

After informed consent is obtained from patients who meet the inclusion criteria for the study, the patients will be intubated following anesthesia induction and the method by which the patients' endotracheal tube cuffs will be inflated will be determined in a randomized manner using the sealed envelope method. Then, the cuff pressures will be checked with a manometer by an expert who does not know the method by which the cuff is inflated, if necessary, it will be corrected and the data will be recorded with the code assigned to the method. Statistical evaluations will be made on the data obtained by an analyst who does not know the names of the methods and which method was applied to which patient.

The difference between our study and previous studies:

* Previous studies had small numbers of patients.
* The authors designed a randomized controlled study with triple masking.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia, General Intubation, Intratracheal

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
Only the person who intubates the patient and inflates the cuff using a method will know what the procedure is.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Stethoscope

Patients whose endotracheal tube cuff is inflated via a stethoscope

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

stethoscope

Intervention Type OTHER

endotracheal tube cuff will be inflated via stethoscope guidance

Audible leak/Balloon palpation

Patients whose endotracheal tube cuff is inflated via audible leak/balloon palpation method.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Audible leak/Balloon palpation

Intervention Type OTHER

endotracheal tube cuff will be inflated via audible leak/balloon palpation method

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

stethoscope

endotracheal tube cuff will be inflated via stethoscope guidance

Intervention Type OTHER

Audible leak/Balloon palpation

endotracheal tube cuff will be inflated via audible leak/balloon palpation method

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Being between the ages of 18-65
* Planning the operation under general anesthesia
* Performing endotracheal intubation during general anesthesia
* Elective surgeries
* Volunteering to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Having a history of difficult intubation before
* Difficulty during intubation (repeated intubation attempts, etc.)
* rapid sequence intubation requirement
* Planning to undergo head and neck surgery
* Those with tracheal stenosis
* Previous intervention to the neck area (radiotherapy, tracheotomy, etc.)
* Pregnancy
* Obesity
* Those with respiratory diseases (COPD, asthma, etc.)
* Emergency surgery
* American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status\>3
* Refusing to participate in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Suleyman Demirel University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mustafa Soner Ozcan

Assistant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mustafa Soner Özcan, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Suleyman Demirel University,Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Suleyman Demirel University

Isparta, Merkez, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kumar CM, Seet E, Van Zundert TCRV. Measuring endotracheal tube intracuff pressure: no room for complacency. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Feb;35(1):3-10. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00501-2. Epub 2020 Mar 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32198671 (View on PubMed)

Duarte NMDC, Caetano AMM, Arouca GO, Ferrreira AT, Figueiredo JL. [Subjective method for tracheal tube cuff inflation: performance of anesthesiology residents and staff anesthesiologists. Prospective observational study]. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2020 Jan-Feb;70(1):9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2019.09.010. Epub 2020 Feb 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32199655 (View on PubMed)

Borhazowal R, Harde M, Bhadade R, Dave S, Aswar SG. Comparison between Two Endotracheal Tube Cuff Inflation Methods; Just-Seal Vs. Stethoscope-Guided. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jun;11(6):UC01-UC03. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/26301.10017. Epub 2017 Jun 1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28764268 (View on PubMed)

Satya Prakash MVS, Aravind C, Mohan VK. Comparative evaluation of three methods of endotracheal tube cuff inflation for adequacy of seal. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Oct-Dec;38(4):588-593. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_560_20. Epub 2022 Jun 15.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 36778817 (View on PubMed)

Unsal O, Seyhun N, Turk B, Ekici M, Dobrucali H, Turgut S. The Evaluation of Upper Airway Complications Secondary to Intubation: Cuff Pressure Manometer Versus Conventional Palpation Method. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2018 Dec 28;52(4):289-295. doi: 10.5350/SEMB.20171214085933. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32774093 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SNR-10/143

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Microaspiration and Endotracheal Tubes
NCT07017205 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA