Airway Ultrasound vs Clinical Predictors for Difficult Airway
NCT ID: NCT07243106
Last Updated: 2025-11-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
140 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-12-20
2026-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study seeks to determine whether ultrasonographic measurements can serve as independent predictors of difficult airway and whether combining them with clinical parameters improves diagnostic accuracy. Additionally, the correlation between sonographic findings and the Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) will be analyzed to assess the potential clinical utility of airway ultrasound in preoperative airway evaluation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ultrasound-Based Airway Assessment for Predicting Difficult Intubation in Adult Female Patients
NCT07343557
Evaluation of Difficult Airway With Ultrasound
NCT07057661
Assessment Of Difficult Airway Predictors: A Prospective Comparison Of Upper Airway Ultrasound And Conventional Anthropometric Measures
NCT07309978
Difficult Airway and Ultrasonographic Evaluation
NCT05347121
Comparison of Ultrasonographic and Anthropometric Measurements in Difficult Airway Evaluation
NCT04140981
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Traditional clinical assessment methods-such as the Mallampati classification, thyromental distance, and sternomental distance-are commonly used to predict difficult airway. However, these predictors have limited sensitivity and specificity, and their diagnostic accuracy may vary depending on operator experience and subjective interpretation.
In recent years, ultrasonography has gained increasing acceptance in anesthesiology as a non-invasive, rapid, inexpensive, and real-time imaging technique. Airway ultrasonography enables direct visualization of individual anatomical variations in the upper airway, providing more objective and reproducible data for airway assessment.
The primary objective of this study is to determine the diagnostic performance of ultrasonographic parameters obtained from preoperative airway ultrasound in predicting difficult laryngoscopy and intubation, and to compare them with conventional clinical assessment methods. The study will also evaluate whether ultrasonographic measurements are independent predictors of difficult airway and whether combining sonographic and clinical parameters enhances overall diagnostic accuracy.
Furthermore, the relationship between ultrasound-based anatomical measurements and the Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) will be analyzed. This correlation aims to demonstrate the potential contribution of airway ultrasonography to clinical decision-making and its possible role in improving airway safety in anesthetic practice.
Hypotheses:
H0 (Null Hypothesis): Airway ultrasonography does not provide higher diagnostic accuracy than traditional clinical assessment methods in predicting difficult intubation and has no significant correlation with the Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS).
H1 (Alternative Hypothesis): Airway ultrasonography provides higher diagnostic accuracy than traditional clinical assessment methods in predicting difficult intubation and is significantly correlated with the Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Adult patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation
Demographic data of all participants-including age, sex, type of planned surgery, ASA physical status, and comorbidities-will be recorded. Before induction of anesthesia, all patients will be evaluated using standard clinical airway assessment parameters. These include the Mallampati score, thyromental distance, sternomental distance, neck circumference, and upper lip bite test. Body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip ratio will also be measured and documented.
In the preoperative period, all patients will undergo airway ultrasonography performed by an anesthesiologist. Sonographic assessments will be carried out by a single experienced anesthesiologist using a linear transducer, with the patient positioned in the sniffing position. The following ultrasound measurements will be obtained and recorded: Skin-to-epiglottis distance, skin-to-hyoid bone distance, skin-to-anterior commissure of the vocal cords distance, skin-to-trachea distance at the suprasternal notch level.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled for elective surgery
* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status I, II, or III
* Planned for endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with a known history of difficult intubation
* Patients with head or neck trauma
* Patients with a history of previous head or neck surgery or head/neck malignancy
* Pregnant patients
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ali Genc
Assistant professor
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
25-MOBAEK-329
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.