Ultrasound Parameters to Predict Difficult Airway

NCT ID: NCT04168840

Last Updated: 2021-03-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

209 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-01

Study Completion Date

2020-01-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Ultrasound has become an essential tool for the daily work of any doctor, but in certain specialties such as Anaesthesiology, its use has greatly increased the safety offered to patients throughout the perioperative period, either to perform nerve blocks, for vascular access, intraoperative hemodynamic management or any other use that allows increasing quality of care.

The management of the upper airway and the diagnosis of pathological conditions are essential skills for any doctor especially for Anaesthesiologist, ER physician, or Intensive Care physician. Because an inadequate airway management continues to be an important contributor to patient mortality and morbidity, any tool that can improve it should be considered as an addition to conventional clinical evaluation.

Unfortunately, most of the clinical parameters that should allow us to assess a potential difficult airway, do not always lead us to an adequate prediction, that is why US(Ultrasound) is use as an emerging tool in many fields, is also gathering strength in this search for a definitive predictor parameter.

Ultrasound has many obvious advantages (safe,fast, repeatable, portable, widely available and gives dynamic images in real time).

Sonographic studies are operator-dependent and although the identification of basic structures could be acquired with only a few hours of training, but more complex studies require a learning curve of months or even years. The high frequency linear probe (5-14 MHz) is probably the most suitable for the airway because images are of superficial structures (within 0-5 cm below the skin surface).

The growing academic interest in the use of US to look for predictors of difficult airway is centred mainly on measurements at the level of pretracheal tissues.

But the greatest limitation of these studies is the disparity of the fat distribution that exists between different ethnic groups and and sexes, and the lack of standardization method in patient´s intubation conditions.

So, the investigator propose to assess different ultrasound windows at the level of pretracheal tissues such as independent predictors of Difficult Airway.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Difficult Intubation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patient undergoing general anesthesia with intubation

Patient undergoing general anesthesia with intubation We will explore clinical airway parameters and external ultrasound parameters of the airway

Compare clinical test with ultrasound parameters

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Compare various clinical test with four ultrasound parameters to predict difficult intubation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Compare clinical test with ultrasound parameters

Compare various clinical test with four ultrasound parameters to predict difficult intubation.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients (male or female) ASA I-III, aged between 18 and 90 years, undergoing scheduled surgery requiring orotracheal intubation. The signature of the informed consent is required authorizing its inclusion in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Obesity class II defined as a BMI greater than 35.
* Pregnant.
* Cervical tumors, goiter or patients who have required radiotherapy at the cervical level
* Abnormalities that condition anatomy alterations such as facial / cervical fractures.
* Maxillofacial abnormalities
* People who cannot give their consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinica Universidad de Navarra

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UPDA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Expert Behaviors USGRA
NCT04454801 UNKNOWN
Decanulation in Critically Ill Patients
NCT07306091 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION