Paradoxical Response to Chest Wall Loading in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

NCT ID: NCT06093958

Last Updated: 2024-03-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-12-01

Study Completion Date

2022-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purposes of our study are to: 1) determine the incidence of paradoxical response to chest wall loading in mechanically ventilated patients; 2) identify sub-populations in which it is most likely to occur (e.g., severe ARDS); and 3) standard the bedside procedure for demonstrating this physiology.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Mechanical ventilation can be a life-saving intervention for patients with respiratory failure, but the acutely injured lung is vulnerable to further damage if positive pressure ventilation is not employed judiciously. "Lung protective ventilation" encompasses a group of practices intended to minimize ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and includes the delivery of low tidal volumes (to minimize dynamic lung strain) and the prevention of injuriously high airway pressures (to minimize lung stress). The prone position, which compresses (or "loads") the chest wall, more evenly distributes volume and pressure, mitigates the damaging effects of stress/strain, and improves clinical outcomes in patients with severe respiratory failure from adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Chest wall loading would not be expected to produce these beneficial effects in the supine position-quite the opposite; it usually results in net volume loss and higher airway pressures in response to an unchanging tidal volume. A paradoxical response to chest wall loading, leading to decreased airway pressures, however, was recently reported in a group of patients with advanced lung disease secondary to COVID-19. In this cohort, a paradoxical decrease in airway pressures was elicited during a brief period of manual compression of the abdomen.

This maneuver, which is non-invasive, free of cost, and gives real-time information, may have important diagnostic (and potentially therapeutic) implications for ventilator management in patients with respiratory failure.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

ARDS COVID-19 Mechanical Ventilation Pressure High Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Chest wall loading

All patients who are receiving mechanical ventilation and are passive on the ventilator will have chest wall loading performed to identify whether there is a paradoxical decrease in lung compliance.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Manual loading of the chest wall

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The chest wall will be loaded by either compression of the abdominal wall, compression of the lumbar spine, or compression of the sternum.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Manual loading of the chest wall

The chest wall will be loaded by either compression of the abdominal wall, compression of the lumbar spine, or compression of the sternum.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Age \< 18 years old
2. Pregnancy at the time of their inclusionary hospitalization
3. Recent (\< 30 days) abdominal or chest wall surgery (including spine)
4. Recent (\< 30 days) abdominal or chest wall trauma (including spine)
5. Traumatic brain injury, intracranial bleed, or recent neurologic surgery
6. Family member or representative not available to provide informed consent
7. Not passive while receiving mechanical ventilation support
8. Hemodynamic instability
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

HealthPartners Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John Selickman, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Minnesota

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Regions Hospital

Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

A21-280

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.