Mini Screw Implant Supported Pontics Versus Removable Partial Dentures For Restoring Missing Permanent Anterior Teeth

NCT ID: NCT06082544

Last Updated: 2023-10-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-01

Study Completion Date

2025-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Loss of teeth leads to loss of function and lack of normal alveolar growth, along with unpleasant esthetics that hamper the psychosocial development of the young child. Traditionally, the management of single tooth loss in a young child is done by conservative means. The presence of large pulp chambers in incompletely mineralized immature teeth of children predisposes the pulp to loss of vitality in cases of complete coverage restorations . Hence, the clinician resorts to partial coverage prostheses such as Maryland Bridge, resin-bonded restorations, or removable prostheses in cases of multiple missing teeth. None of these treatment methods are completely satisfactory and have their drawbacks.

Partial dentures are dependent on the child's compliance. They increase the rate of decay and may cause gingival disease leading to bone resorption. Furthermore, there is a need to refabricate a new prosthesis from time to time to compensate for craniofacial growth.

Mini-screw implant placement in a young child would be an ideal method of treatment for the absence of teeth. They restore the function, preserve the alveolar bone, and give excellent esthetics, restoring the child's confidence and social acceptability. Parents are usually keen to get this treatment done as soon as offer the suggestion. To our knowledge, there is no previous study that compared the two techniques. The limited evidence shows that mini-screw implants supported pontics are useful transitional restorations for missing permanent maxillary incisors in children and adolescents; however, further well-designed clinical trials are needed in this regard. As a result, this study will be conducted to fill the gap of knowledge.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale for conducting the research Mini- screw implant prosthetic rehabilitation seems to be a viable and promising option for provisional rehabilitation of growing patients, since it seems to preserve the bone structure while restoring function and esthetics until growth ceases, when then mini-screw implants can be replaced by standard implants.

Benefits for the practitioner:

* Providing new and alternative treatment options for restoring missing permanent anterior teeth with fixed mini-screw implant supported pontics.
* Increasing the compliance of the patients.

Benefits for the patient:

* Re-establish esthetic and appearance.
* Maintenance of space.
* Re-establishing occlusal relationships.
* Improving phonetics.
* Improving patients tolerance.
* Improvement in patient as well as parent satisfaction.

Benefits for community:

* Using alternative technique that can be fixed, with a better success rate.
* To boost overall oral health.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Missing Teeth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Mini-screw implant-supported pontics placed palatally perpendicular to the alveolar ridge

Mini-screw implant-supported pontics placed palatally perpendicular to the alveolar ridge (horizontally placed) using JEIL SCREW 1.6\*8 MM 16-G2-008

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

mini-screw implant

Intervention Type OTHER

JEIL SCREW 1.6\* 8 MM 16-G2-008 or JEIL SCREW 1.6\*10 MM 14-G2-010

Mini screw implant supported pontics placed at the crest of the ridge

Mini screw implant supported pontics placed at the crest of the ridge (vertically placed) using JEIL SCREW 1.6\* 10 MM 14-G2-f010

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

mini-screw implant

Intervention Type OTHER

JEIL SCREW 1.6\* 8 MM 16-G2-008 or JEIL SCREW 1.6\*10 MM 14-G2-010

Removable partial denture.

removable partial denture with conventional technique

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

removable partial denture

Intervention Type DEVICE

Acrylic removable partial denture

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

mini-screw implant

JEIL SCREW 1.6\* 8 MM 16-G2-008 or JEIL SCREW 1.6\*10 MM 14-G2-010

Intervention Type OTHER

removable partial denture

Acrylic removable partial denture

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* • Cooperative children.

* 9:14 years old children.
* Children with missing anterior permanent teeth either due to caries, trauma (at least 4 months after missing the tooth) or congenitally missed.

Exclusion Criteria

* Children with physical or emotional alteration.
* Children with systemic diseases.
* Children of parents who don't accept to participate in the study.
* Very thin ridge
Minimum Eligible Age

9 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

14 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Eman Adel Abd Elhameed

assistant lecturer in the department of pediatric dentistry

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eman A Abdelhameed, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistant lecturer at Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department

Gihan M Abuelniel, PHD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Professor at Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department

Ahmed H El Khadem, PHD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Associate Professor at Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department

Maii M Mohamed, PHD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Lecturer at Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department

Ahmed M Abdel Samad, PHD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Professor at Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Department

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

Giza, Al Manial, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Eman A Abdelhameed, MD

Role: CONTACT

01002552228

Gihan M Abuelniel, PHD

Role: CONTACT

01005886102

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Eman A Abdelhameed, MD

Role: primary

01002552228

Gihan M Abuelniel, PHD

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

29208130101509

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.