Diagnostic Accuracy of Fine Needle Aspiration in Patients With Salivary Gland Tumors.
NCT ID: NCT06034782
Last Updated: 2023-09-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
128 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-02-22
2022-06-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The present retrospective study was carried out from 2/2021 to 4/2022 by collecting data from the files of patients who underwent surgery at the Oral and Maxillofacial Clinic of the Theageneio Cancer Hospital of Thessaloniki 1996-2022 and the General Hospital of Thessaloniki G. Papanikolaou 2015-2022. The study was conducted according to the STARD 2015 protocol.
FNA contributed significantly to the differential preoperative process in salivary gland diseases. The differential diagnosis of a lesion in benign / malignant preoperatively, with the use of FNA, enables the surgeon for a more beneficial to the patient and oncologically safer planning of the surgery. It is considered important the high sensitivity provided by the examination, as it helps to exclude with sufficient safety the possible malignancy of the tumor located in the salivary gland of the patient.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Diagnostic and Prognostic Accuracy of Gold Nanoparticles in Salivary Gland Tumours
NCT04907422
Prospective Registry Study on the Implementation of Simultaneous Postoperative Radiochemotherapy for Salivary Gland Carcinomas of the Head and Neck Region
NCT06464198
Efficacy of N-acetylcysteine in Preventing Radiotherapy-Induced Oral Mucositis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.
NCT06354712
Submandibular Gland Stem Cell Transplantation
NCT04593589
Randomized Study Regarding Preventive Jaw- and Swallowing Intervention for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
NCT04005521
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients who were included in the present study, except for clinical examination by an Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, also underwent at least one imaging modality (MRI, CT scan, ultrasound scan).
This retrospective study was carried out from 2/2021 to 4/2022. Data from records of patients who underwent salivary tumour surgery at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery departments of Theageneio Anti-Cancer Hospital of Thessaloniki 1996-2022 and of the General Hospital of Thessaloniki G. Papanikolaou 2015-2022 were collected.
The surgical treatment of all patients with salivary gland tumors who were examined by a practitioner of the two aforementioned Maxillofacial departments, was based on their chronological attendance at the outpatient clinic, while there was no attempt of grouping of them.
Based on the FNA report, FNA results were categorized as follows: Benign, Malignant, Non-diagnostic, Unavailable result. The same categories were obtained for the reference standard test, which was the histopathological examination of the resected tumor.
The sample size was calculated using the software G power analysis version 3.1.9.6. For α = 0.05 and study strength Power 0.95 a sample size of 102 patients had been obtained which was relatively smaller compared to the 128 patients that were finally included in the study.
During the data collection from the medical patient records, there were 11 (n = 11) out of 139 (n = 139) cases whose FNA result and 4 (n=4) out of 184 (n=184) whose histological result was non-diagnostic as it was not clearly concluded whether the lesion was benign or malignant. These cases were excluded from the estimation of diagnostic accuracy indicators. Likewise to the non-diagnostic results, were excluded the 145 (n = 145) FNA results that were not available.
To assess the diagnostic accuracy of FNA, a comparative process among FNA and histopathological outcomes was conducted. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, ROC curve and AUC (Area Under curve) were calculated. Calculations were made using software RStudio Version 1.4.1106 © 2009-2021 RStudio, PBC "Tiger Daylily" (2389bc24, 2021-02-11) for Windows Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) Apple Web Kit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Qt Web Engine/5.12.8 Chrome/69.0.3497.128 Safari/537.36.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
patients with salivary gland tumors
patients with salivary gland tumors
Fine Needle Aspiration
Fine Needle Aspiration of a salivary gland tumor
Histologic Examination
Histologic examination of resected salivary tumor
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fine Needle Aspiration
Fine Needle Aspiration of a salivary gland tumor
Histologic Examination
Histologic examination of resected salivary tumor
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* salivary tumor suspected
* FNA result available
* Salivary tumor surgically resected
* Histologic result available
Exclusion Criteria
* FNA result or Histologic result not available
* No tumor resection
* Other neck tumors (not salivary tumor)
24 Years
96 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Theodoros V. Grivas, Medical
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Aristotle University Thessaloniki
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Aristotle University
Thessaloniki, , Greece
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
18/22-02-2021
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.