Laryngeal Mask Airway in Laparoscopic Hernia Repair

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

62 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-03-27

Study Completion Date

2024-05-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This prospective randomized study will evaluate the effectiveness of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) versus endotracheal intubation (ETT) for patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia at CMH.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair: Are Muscle Relaxants Necessary? Endotracheal Intubation vs Laryngeal Mask Airway

NCT02696837

Inguinal Hernia Endotracheal Intubation Laryngeal Mask +1 more

COMPLETED NA

Comparison of Tracheal Intubation vs Laryngeal Mask Airway in Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair

NCT04788771

Lung Functions Pain Score

COMPLETED NA

Strattice in Repair of Inguinal Hernias

NCT00681291

Hernia, Inguinal

COMPLETED PHASE4

The Mesh-RTL Project, for Prevention of Incisional Hernia

NCT04134455

Hernia Incisional

COMPLETED NA

Long Term Outcomes Following Hernia Repair With Mesh

NCT04578340

Abdominal Hernia

RECRUITING

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness during general anesthesia of laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. There are limited pediatric literature evaluating the use of laryngeal mask airway for laparoscopic procedures compared with traditional endotracheal intubation. This study aims to add to this literature in providing information comparing the two techniques. The rationale for this study is to show that general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway is an effective and non-inferior technique compared with general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and may offer benefits in terms of efficiency of care and respiratory complications.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Inguinal Hernia Inguinal Hernia, Indirect Inguinal Hernia Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Unilateral

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cohort A: Receives Laryngeal Mask Airway Device

In this study arm, after induction of general anesthesia, the patients will receive a laryngeal mask airway device.

Group Type OTHER

Laryngeal Mask Airway

Intervention Type DEVICE

Laryngeal mask airway will be used as an airway device for Cohort A in the standard fashion.

Cohort B: Receives Endotracheal Tube Device

In this arm, after induction of general anesthesia, the patients will receive an endotracheal tube airway device.

Group Type OTHER

Endotracheal Tube Device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Endotracheal tube airway will be used as an airway device for Cohort B in the standard fashion.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.