Research on the Application of Blood Collection Through Midline Catheters of Different Lengths
NCT ID: NCT06014099
Last Updated: 2023-10-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
162 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-10-27
2025-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Mini Midline Catheters With Different Placement Sites: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06106659
Midline Catheter Versus Long Peripheral Intravenous Catheter in Hospitalized Adult Patients
NCT05884294
Non Dilation on the Central Venous Catheterization（NDCVC-01）
NCT06652191
Standard Length Catheters vs Long Catheters in Peripheral Vein Cannulation.
NCT01917253
Midline Catheters Versus Peripheral Catheters in Internal Medicine Unit
NCT05512117
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Midline catheter
The test group2 used MC for blood collection.
Midline catheter for blood collection
used MCs for blood collection
Long peripheral venous catheters
In the test 1 group, blood was collected using LPC.
Long peripheral venous catheters for blood collection
used LPC for blood collection
short peripheral venous catheters
In the control group,blood was collected using SPC.
SPCs for blood collection
used SPCs for blood collection
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Long peripheral venous catheters for blood collection
used LPC for blood collection
Midline catheter for blood collection
used MCs for blood collection
SPCs for blood collection
used SPCs for blood collection
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The estimated treatment time of intravenous infusion is 1-4 weeks, and the nature of the infusion drug meets the indications of LPCs and MCs.
* Blood samples should be collected more than 3 times during the hospital.
Exclusion Criteria
* Plan to discharge from the hospital with the tube.
* Vulnerable groups, including people with mental illness, cognitive impairment, critically ill patients, minors, pregnant women, illiterate, etc.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Zhao Linfang
Assitant nursing director
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Linfang Zhao
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Linfang Zhao
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Picheth G, Guidi GC. Laboratory Diagnostics and Quality of Blood Collection. J Med Biochem. 2015 Jul;34(3):288-294. doi: 10.2478/jomb-2014-0043. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
HO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee[J]. 2015.
Tsukuda Y, Funakoshi T, Nasuhara Y, Nagano Y, Shimizu C, Iwasaki N. Venipuncture Nerve Injuries in the Upper Extremity From More Than 1 Million Procedures. J Patient Saf. 2019 Dec;15(4):299-301. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000264.
Jeong Y, Park H, Jung MJ, Kim MS, Byun S, Choi Y. Comparisons of laboratory results between two blood samplings: Venipuncture versus peripheral venous catheter-A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Clin Nurs. 2019 Oct;28(19-20):3416-3429. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14918. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
Gorski LA, Hadaway L, Hagle ME, Broadhurst D, Clare S, Kleidon T, Meyer BM, Nickel B, Rowley S, Sharpe E, Alexander M. Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice, 8th Edition. J Infus Nurs. 2021 Jan-Feb 01;44(1S Suppl 1):S1-S224. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000396. No abstract available.
Wicker S, Stirn AV, Rabenau HF, von Gierke L, Wutzler S, Stephan C. Needlestick injuries: causes, preventability and psychological impact. Infection. 2014 Jun;42(3):549-52. doi: 10.1007/s15010-014-0598-0. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
Zhang Y, Zhang S, Chen J, Zhao R. Blood sampling from peripherally inserted central catheter is effective and safe for patients with head and neck cancers. J Vasc Access. 2021 May;22(3):424-431. doi: 10.1177/1129729820943458. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IV202308
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.