Central Line Placement-EVALUATION OF LINE DEPTH AS A FACTOR IN NEED FOR LINE REPLACEMENT SECONDARY TO MALPOSITION
NCT ID: NCT02602665
Last Updated: 2020-01-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-12-01
2021-12-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Mini Midline Catheters With Different Placement Sites: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06106659
A Difference in Subclavian Vein Catheterization Between Supine and Lateral Tilt Position - Stage I
NCT03296735
Peripherally Inserted Versus Centrally Inserted Central Venous Catheters in the Neurological Intensive Care
NCT01495429
Correct Tip Position of Central Venous Catheters
NCT05176886
Central Line Study
NCT05534971
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Current standard of care does not dictate positioning of the line in a specific loacation. In the presence of these findings, we are proposing to conduct a single center randomized control trial in which tunneled central line catheters will be placed in two distinct, select positions. After informed consent is obtained from the patient and family, they will be randomized to one of two treatment groups. The shallow group will have the tip of the catheter located approximately one vertebral body above the carina. The deep group will have the catheter tip placed 1.5 to 2.5 vertebral bodies below the carina. Central line placement will be performed under fluoroscopy in the operating room to optimize catheter placement. Chest X ray in the post operative area will be used to confirm catheter tip position. The catheter tip position will then be followed up prospectively using chest X ray films at or within three months after placement to determine whether there is any malpositioning of the tip.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Shallow catheter tip placement
Patients randomized to shallow tip placement will have the tip of the catheter placed approximately one vertebral body above to even with the carina.
Shallow catheter tip placement
for shallow placement tip of catheter placed 1 vertebral body above to even with the carina
Deep catheter tip placement
Patients randomized to deep tip placement will have the tip of the catheter placed 1.5 to 2.5 vertebral bodies below the carina.
Deep catheter tip placement
deep placement catheter tip is placed 1.5 to 2.5 vertebral bodies below the carina
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Shallow catheter tip placement
for shallow placement tip of catheter placed 1 vertebral body above to even with the carina
Deep catheter tip placement
deep placement catheter tip is placed 1.5 to 2.5 vertebral bodies below the carina
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Non ultrasound placed lines, femoral lines, saphenous vein lines, and cut downs
* Short gut syndrome children \< 1 year of age
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Michigan
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marcus Jarboe
Assistant Professor of Surgery and Assistant Professor of Radiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marcus Jarboe
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Michigan
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
98248
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.