The Side of Implantable Central Vascular Catheters and Complications

NCT ID: NCT01525277

Last Updated: 2014-04-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

246 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-03-31

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Whether the side of implantable CVCs was associated with the complication rates remains unclear. The investigators plan this study to explore this issue by randomizing patients to receive CVC implantation at the left subclavian or righ subclavian vein.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Implantable central venous catheters (CVC) are crucial for cancer patients. They provide central venous access for chemotherapy and high-concentration nutrition support. However, several potential CVC-related complications may develop and severely interfere with the patients' cancer treatment and can be life-threatening in some occasions.

Thrombotic events occurred in around 20% of cancer patients with implantable CVCs. Such events included intraluminal thrombosis and catheter-related venous thrombosis. Catheter removal was usually necessary to resolve these conditions. Treatment delays are inevitable for these patients. Besides, these thrombotic complications were associated with catheter-related infection, which could be highly dangerous for cancer patients.

Risk factors associated with these thrombotic events included the hypercoagulable state of the patients, the cancer types, the catheter types, and the placement of the catheter tips in the superior vena cava. Some single-arm studies found that CVC inserted from the left subclavian veins led to more CVC-related thrombosis than those inserted from the right subclavian vein. However, for most right-handed patients, to place these implantable CVCs on the right side is inconvenient for daily life because vigorous exercise was then impossible. Besides, these single-arm studies could not well control the other potentially interfering factors, such as the operators, catheter location and cancer types.

Therefore, we plan a randomized observational study to explore whether the side of implantable CVCs was actually associated with the complication rates. Cancer patients who need implantable CVCs will be randomized to have the catheters implanted either in the left subclavian vein or the right subclavian. Patients who had breast cancer, mediastinal mass with the diameter \> 6 cm, ECOG performance score \>2, or those who were not able to receive a standing P-A view chest X-ray will be excluded. Patients who had other reasons that prevented the randomization will also be excluded. The catheter-related complications will be actively reported by the patients. We will also enforce the records of complications by chart reviews and regular telephone contacts.

With the study, we can demonstrate whether a left-sided CVC and a right-sided CVC are different in complication rates. The result should be very useful in clinical practice.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis, Secondary

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

left subclavian vein

CVC implanted in the left subclavian vein

No interventions assigned to this group

right subclavian vein

CVC implanted in the right subclavian vein

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Cancer patients who required implantable CVCs
2. Age \> 20
3. Not previously implanted with implantable CVCs in subclavian veins.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Breast cancer patients
2. Mediastinal mass \> 6 cm
3. ECOG performance score \> 2
4. Not able to receive a standing P-A view chest X-ray exam.
5. One of the subclavian veins has problems preventing randomization
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Taiwan University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yu-Yun Shao, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Taiwan University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yu-Yun Shao, MD

Role: CONTACT

886223123456 ext. 67010

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Yu-Yun Shao, MD

Role: primary

886223123456 ext. 67010

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

201110050RB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CVCs Versus Midline Catheters
NCT06884176 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA