Non Dilation on the Central Venous Catheterization（NDCVC-01）
NCT ID: NCT06652191
Last Updated: 2024-10-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
336 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-28
2025-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Adequate Insertion Depth of Dilator During Central Venous Catheterization
NCT04279808
The Central Venous Catheter Related Complications in Critically Ill Patients
NCT03841240
Comparison of Two Needle Insertion Techniques on Success Rate and Complications During Central Venous Catheterization
NCT01902355
Video Demonstration and Video Feedback to Reduce Time to Perform Central Vein Cannulation in Junior Residents
NCT04805372
Comparison of Short-term Application of Dialysis Catheter With Tunnel-cuffed Catheter Versus Non-ccuffed Catheter: a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study
NCT06206447
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study is a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.The sample size was calculated by non-inferiority test:(1)the success rate of central venous catheterization was 97.98% according to Meta-analysis references;(2)α =0.025;(3)power 90%;(4)missed follow-up rate 20%, and ultimately 336 samples were included in the study,168 patients in each group.
Patients will receive written and verbal information about the trial before written consent is obtained. Randomization will take place on the day of surgery, and patients will be assigned to the intervention group (direct catheterization with non-dilation) or the control group (catheterization after expanding the skin with a dilator) . The randomization is performed using concealed allocation where envelopes are prepared externally using a randomization list prepared by a research assistant.
Under ultrasound guidance, The patient will undergo central venous catheterization by an experienced anesthesiologist based on grouping information.In the control group, catheter was inserted after skin expansion with dilator, while in the test group, catheter was inserted directly with non-dilator.The success rate of catheterization, the total time of catheterization, and complications were recorded.The patients were followed up for 24 hours after surgery and asked about their comfort level.
Shapiro-Wilk test is used to test normality for continuous variables, with data expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and independent t-test is used for statistical analysis.For categorical data, the incidence of immediate complications is expressed as a percentage (%), and chi square test is used to statistically analyze the incidence of various complications.For the Primary outcome ,success rate of catheterization, the method of confidence interval is used. If the lower limit of confidence interval \> negative non-inferiority threshold, the non-inferiority is considered. P \< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
The test group:Direct catheterization with non-dilation
Under the guidance of real-time ultrasound, the right internal jugular vein was punctured and a guide wire was inserted, place the catheter into the vessel directly along the guide wire without using an dilator to expand the skin
Direct catheterization with non-dilation
Under the guidance of real-time ultrasound, the right internal jugular vein was punctured and a guide wire was inserted, place the catheter into the vessel directly along the guide wire without using an dilator to expand the skin
The control group: Catheterization after expanding the skin with a dilator
Under the guidance of real-time ultrasound, the right internal jugular vein was punctured and a guide wire was inserted, after the skin is expanded with a dilator, the catheter is inserted into the vessel along the guide wire
Catheterization after expanding the skin with a dilator
Under the guidance of real-time ultrasound, the right internal jugular vein was punctured and a guide wire was inserted, after the skin is expanded with a dilator, the catheter is inserted into the vessel along the guide wire
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Direct catheterization with non-dilation
Under the guidance of real-time ultrasound, the right internal jugular vein was punctured and a guide wire was inserted, place the catheter into the vessel directly along the guide wire without using an dilator to expand the skin
Catheterization after expanding the skin with a dilator
Under the guidance of real-time ultrasound, the right internal jugular vein was punctured and a guide wire was inserted, after the skin is expanded with a dilator, the catheter is inserted into the vessel along the guide wire
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* (2) patients with internal jugular vein catheterization
Exclusion Criteria
* （2）Patients with contraindications to central venous catheterization
* （3）Patients with imaging examination suggesting thrombosis in the internal jugular vein before puncture
* （4）Patients who refused to participate, did not sign or refused to sign the informed consent form
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sanqing Jin, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
the Sixth Affiliated Hostipal, Sun Yet Sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
iData Research. Central Venous Catheter Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis, Global, 2020-2026. 2020. Accessed October 26, 2023
秦志均,等.改良中心静脉穿刺术对穿刺置管并发症的影响.现代临床医学2016( 04) :023
Collier PE. Prevention and treatment of dilator injuries during central venous catheter placement. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019 Nov;7(6):789-792. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.06.020. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
Kulvatunyou N, Heard SO, Bankey PE. A subclavian artery injury, secondary to internal jugular vein cannulation, is a predictable right-sided phenomenon. Anesth Analg. 2002 Sep;95(3):564-6, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200209000-00012.
Oropello JM, Leibowitz AB, Manasia A, Del Guidice R, Benjamin E. Dilator-associated complications of central vein catheter insertion: possible mechanisms of injury and suggestions for prevention. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1996 Aug;10(5):634-7. doi: 10.1016/s1053-0770(96)80142-x. No abstract available.
Adhya S, Laha SK. Central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 30;357(9):944; author reply 944-5. No abstract available.
Safety Committee of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. Practical guide for safe central venous catheterization and management 2017. J Anesth. 2020 Apr;34(2):167-186. doi: 10.1007/s00540-019-02702-9. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, Davidson A, Paisley S, Beverley C, Thomas S. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003 Aug 16;327(7411):361. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7411.361.
Lim T, Ryu HG, Jung CW, Jeon Y, Bahk JH. Effect of the bevel direction of puncture needle on success rate and complications during internal jugular vein catheterization. Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):491-4. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232da48.
Lee YH, Kim TK, Jung YS, Cho YJ, Yoon S, Seo JH, Jeon Y, Bahk JH, Hong DM. Comparison of Needle Insertion and Guidewire Placement Techniques During Internal Jugular Vein Catheterization: The Thin-Wall Introducer Needle Technique Versus the Cannula-Over-Needle Technique. Crit Care Med. 2015 Oct;43(10):2112-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001167.
Kim E, Kim BG, Lim YJ, Jeon YT, Hwang JW, Kim HC, Choi YH, Park HP. A prospective randomised trial comparing insertion success rate and incidence of catheterisation-related complications for subclavian venous catheterisation using a thin-walled introducer needle or a catheter-over-needle technique. Anaesthesia. 2016 Sep;71(9):1030-6. doi: 10.1111/anae.13543. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
Song IK, Kim EH, Lee JH, Jang YE, Kim HS, Kim JT. Seldinger vs modified Seldinger techniques for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterisation in neonates: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Dec;121(6):1332-1337. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
Teja B, Bosch NA, Diep C, Pereira TV, Mauricio P, Sklar MC, Sankar A, Wijeysundera HC, Saskin R, Walkey A, Wijeysundera DN, Wunsch H. Complication Rates of Central Venous Catheters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2024 May 1;184(5):474-482. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.8232.
McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2003 Mar 20;348(12):1123-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra011883. No abstract available.
Smith RN, Nolan JP. Central venous catheters. BMJ. 2013 Nov 11;347:f6570. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6570. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024ZSLYEC-387
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.